Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 02:42 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 02:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
jerrywu
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Last visit: 20 Aug 2008
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
3,400
 [182]
Location: Taipei
Posts: 125
Kudos: 3,400
 [182]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
161
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
anairamitch1804
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2019
Posts: 506
Own Kudos:
3,564
 [87]
Given Kudos: 877
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE:Education (Education)
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
Posts: 506
Kudos: 3,564
 [87]
55
Kudos
Add Kudos
31
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [75]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [75]
45
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,763
 [4]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,763
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
jerrywu
Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to single out a country as an unfair trader, begin trade negotiations with that country, and, if the negotiations do not conclude by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose sanctions.

(A) by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose
(B) by the United States government's satisfaction, impose
(C) with the United States government's being satisfied, imposing
(D) to the United States government's satisfaction, impose
(E) to the United States government's satisfaction, imposing

Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:
Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that if negotiations with an unfair trader do not end to the United States government's satisfaction, the United States Trade Representative is enabled to impose sanctions on the unfair trader.

Concepts tested here: Meaning + Verb Forms + Parallelism + Awkwardness/Redundancy

• All elements in a list must be parallel.
• "to + base form of verb" is the correct infinitive verb form construction.

A: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "conclude by the United States government's being satisfied"; the construction of this phrase leads to an incoherent meaning; the intended meaning is that if negotiations with an unfair trader do not end to the United States government's satisfaction, the United States Trade Representative is enabled to impose sanctions on the unfair trader. Further, Option A fails to maintain parallelism among "single out a country as an unfair trader", "begin trade negotiations with that country", and "to impose sanctions"; please remember, all elements in a list must be parallel.

B: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "conclude by the United States government's satisfaction"; the construction of this phrase leads to an incoherent meaning; the intended meaning is that if negotiations with an unfair trader do not end to the United States government's satisfaction, the United States Trade Representative is enabled to impose sanctions on the unfair trader.

C: This answer choice fails to maintain the correct infinitive verb form construction, as it uses the present participle ("verb+ing" - "imposing" in this sentence) rather than the base form of the verb; please remember, "to + base form of verb" is the correct infinitive verb form construction. Further, Option C uses the passive voice construction "the United States government's being satisfied", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

D: Correct. This answer choice uses the phrase "conclude to the United States government's satisfaction", conveying the intended meaning - that if negotiations with an unfair trader do not end to the United States government's satisfaction, the United States Trade Representative is enabled to impose sanctions on the unfair trader. Further, Option D correctly uses the base form of the word - "impose", maintaining the correct infinitive verb form construction ("to + base form of verb' - "to + impose" in this sentence). Additionally, Option D maintains parallelism among "single out a country as an unfair trader", "begin trade negotiations with that country", and "impose sanctions". Besides, Option D is free of any awkwardness or redundancy.

E: This answer choice fails to maintain the correct infinitive verb form construction, as it uses the present participle ("verb+ing" - "imposing" in this sentence) rather than the base form of the verb; please remember, "to + base form of verb" is the correct infinitive verb form construction.

Hence, D is the best answer choice.

All the best!
Experts' Global Team
General Discussion
User avatar
TaN1213
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Last visit: 12 Mar 2019
Posts: 354
Own Kudos:
909
 [8]
Given Kudos: 644
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 354
Kudos: 909
 [8]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jerrywu
Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to single out a country as an unfair trader, begin trade negotiations with that country, and, if the negotiations do not conclude by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose sanctions.

(A) by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose
(B) by the United States government's satisfaction, impose
(C) with the United States government's being satisfied, imposing
(D) to the United States government's satisfaction, impose
(E) to the United States government's satisfaction, imposing

Contendors- B and D

Conclude to signifies reaching to an end. In general, the preposition 'To' is used to denote a destination; for instance , " Travelling to Venice" or more relevantly- "Don't jump to a conclusion."
The preposition 'by' mainly describes the 'how' of the action.
Example: " I've informed the mayor by calling his secretary" or "Donald Trump concluded his tenure of presidency by declaring a war with North Korea"
---D---
Hope it helps.
avatar
MHMBA2019
Joined: 18 Jan 2017
Last visit: 09 Aug 2018
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
19
 [4]
Given Kudos: 171
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jerrywu
Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to single out a country as an unfair trader, begin trade negotiations with that country, and, if the negotiations do not conclude by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose sanctions.

(A) by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose
(B) by the United States government's satisfaction, impose
(C) with the United States government's being satisfied, imposing
(D) to the United States government's satisfaction, impose
(E) to the United States government's satisfaction, imposing

(A) by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose
error with parallelism (single, begin, to impose), conclude by is incorrect and government's being satisfied is also incorrect
(B) by the United States government's satisfaction, impose
conclude by.. satisfaction is not correct, parallelism is correct ( single, begin, impose)
(C) with the United States government's being satisfied, imposing
conclude with would change the meaning of the sentence, being satisfied is incorrect and parallelism is wrong (single, begin, imposing)
(D) to the United States government's satisfaction, impose
conclude to..satisfaction is correct, parallelism is correct- best choice
(E) to the United States government's satisfaction, imposing
conclude to... satisfaction is correct, parallelism is incorrect (single, begin, imposing)
avatar
Rocket7
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Last visit: 01 Jan 2023
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 47
Products:
Posts: 82
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guys just wanted to ask you guys a quick question about if-then construction in this question. Here is what I am thinking and can anyone confirm if I am correct:

if simple present (do), then simple present (impose)
if the negotiations do not conclude..... then impose sanctions.

thanks
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [2]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rocket7
Guys just wanted to ask you guys a quick question about if-then construction in this question. Here is what I am thinking and can anyone confirm if I am correct:

if simple present (do), then simple present (impose)
if the negotiations do not conclude..... then impose sanctions.
Hi Rocket7, think about the construct in this way:

If the negotiations do not conclude to the United States government's satisfaction, Section 301 enables US Trade Representative to impose sanctions.
User avatar
pkshankar
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Last visit: 25 Apr 2019
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 42
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19
Posts: 64
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jerrywu
Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to single out a country as an unfair trader, begin trade negotiations with that country, and, if the negotiations do not conclude by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose sanctions.

(A) by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose
(B) by the United States government's satisfaction, impose
(C) with the United States government's being satisfied, imposing
(D) to the United States government's satisfaction, impose
(E) to the United States government's satisfaction, imposing

Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to do ‘X’, ‘Y’ and ‘Z’

A - INCORRECT

1) ‘X’ and ‘Y’ use the active construction whereas ‘Z’ uses passive construction
2) Parallelism issue: to single| begin | to impose
3) ‘By’ – incorrect idiom

B - INCORRECT

1) By – incorrect idiom

C - INCORRECT

1) ‘X’ and ‘Y’ use the active construction whereas ‘Z’ uses passive construction
2) Parallelism issue: to single| begin | imposing

D – CORRECT

This uses the correct active form and more importantly uses the correct parallel structure
To (single| begin | impose)

E – INCORRECT

1) Parallelism issue: to single| begin | imposing
User avatar
NandishSS
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Last visit: 28 Jan 2021
Posts: 720
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 720
Kudos: 1,721
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jerrywu
Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to single out a country as an unfair trader, begin trade negotiations with that country, and, if the negotiations do not conclude by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose sanctions.

(C) with the United States government's being satisfied, imposing

(E) to the United States government's satisfaction, imposing

HI GMATNinja, mikemcgarry, egmat, DmitryFarber, MagooshExpert (Carolyn), ccooley, GMATGuruNY, EMPOWERgmatVerbal , EducationAisle

Can we eliminate the above two options based on the meaning that imposing -ing verb referring to the preceding clause and subject of that clause?

So here imposing refers to negotiations and negotiations cannot impose sanctions.

I know there is parallelism issue but I want to know is my above reason valid?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NandishSS I wouldn't read it that way. It's hard to say exactly what a sentence means when it's wrong, but we should use the overall structure. We need "impose" to be parallel with "single out" and "begin." These are the actions that the OTCA enables. The "if" part is a modifier for the verb "impose," and not the other way around.
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi NandishSS, you seem to be suggesting that negotiations is the subject of the preceding clause. Actually the subject of the preceding clause is Section 301 (and not negotiations).

Nevertheless, we cannot interpret it in this manner for multiple reasons.

1) The structure you are referring to is:

Clause, present participial phrase.

For example: India won all the league matches, reaching the finals.

In this case however, the presence of and (and, if the negotiations…) precludes the possibility of interpreting C and E in the manner you have suggested.

2) In C and E, the barebones structure of the sentence is:

Section 301 enables United States to single out…, begin…, and imposing…

It is very clear that imposing is not parallel with single and begin.
User avatar
BLTN
Joined: 25 Aug 2020
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 216
Posts: 242
Kudos: 255
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyTargetTestPrep

Dear Marty,
could you elaborate, does it compound subject?

Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to....

Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade
and
Section 301 of the Competitiveness Act
enables?
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mike20201
MartyTargetTestPrep

Dear Marty,
could you elaborate, does it compound subject?

Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to....

Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade
and
Section 301 of the Competitiveness Act
enables?


Why number(301) of Section 301 of one act and the same number of that of another act need to be same ? It doesn't make sense under normal circumstance. Even after repetition of "OF ", it doesn't make sense.
Secondly, Act is not repeated before and ( Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade ACT) . Again doesn't make sense.

Actually this part is anyways in non-underlined part, So I think its not worth arguing or imagining different scenarios.

If it were underlined, we would have other hints to accept or reject the part.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BLTN
MartyTargetTestPrep

Dear Marty,
could you elaborate, does it compound subject?

Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to....

Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade
and
Section 301 of the Competitiveness Act
enables?
Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act is one thing, one section. So, "Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act" is not a compound subject.

Notice that "Competitiveness Act" would not on its own be a subject. In order to work correctly as a subject, it would have to be "the Competitiveness Act."

So, if the subject were a compound subject, the word "the" would be repeated as in, "Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and the Competitiveness Act ..."
User avatar
Dinesh654
Joined: 08 Jun 2021
Last visit: 11 Aug 2024
Posts: 155
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Status:In learning mode...
Location: India
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Posts: 155
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyTargetTestPrep mgmat egmat
Hi experts,

I can't understand why B is wrong?
Is it because - negotiation do not conclude by "satisfaction"- is senseless?

or its because of the idiom, conclude by - is always wrong?

Can you please suggest something about idioms, especially for non natives, its tough to decode the meaning!

*Is there a frequently tested list?

*Or should I strengthen my prepositions?
*If yes, Is there any reliable source for prepositions related to Gmat?

Thanks!
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dcoolguy
Hi experts,

I can't understand why B is wrong?
Is it because - negotiation do not conclude by "satisfaction"- is senseless?

or its because of the idiom, conclude by - is always wrong?
The issue is that the meaning is nonsensical.

"Conclude by" is used in a few ways, but "conclude by ... satisfaction" is meaningless. There is no way to "conclude by ... satisfaction."

Something can conclude by 2 pm, or someone can conclude by summarizing his points, but nothing can conclude by satisfaction.

Quote:
Can you please suggest something about idioms, especially for non natives, its tough to decode the meaning!

*Is there a frequently tested list?

*Or should I strengthen my prepositions?
*If yes, Is there any reliable source for prepositions related to Gmat?

Thanks!
The relevant idiom in this case is "x to y's satisfaction," which means that some person or group y is satisfied with outcome x.

Examples:

The job was completed to the board's satisfaction.

The car was fixed to the owner's satisfaction.

The negotiations concluded to our satisfaction.

Honestly though, this question is from a long time ago, and now the GMAT has moved away from using many idioms in order for the test to be fair to non-native speakers.

So, you don't need to study so called "GMAT idioms," which are really idiomatic expressions, much. You're better off going through an list of idiomatic expressions relatively quickly to review some and working on learning about prepositions and other things you need to understand in order to understand meaning conveyed than you are spending a lot of time on idioms.

For a list of some idiomatic expressions that may appear on the GMAT, see this post. 101 Common GMAT Idioms
User avatar
goncalogomes2000
Joined: 30 Jan 2023
Last visit: 26 Mar 2023
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Location: Macau
Posts: 12
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm sorry but now I'm confused,

What is the difrence between:

- United States government's
- Government of the United States
- United States's government
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts