GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Feb 2019, 15:59

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT Algebra Webinar

February 17, 2019

February 17, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Attend this Free Algebra Webinar and learn how to master Inequalities and Absolute Value problems on GMAT.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

February 16, 2019

February 16, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# Selective Incapacitation

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 22
Selective Incapacitation  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 29 Nov 2018, 17:41
3
Question 1
00:00

based on 19 sessions

22% (04:22) correct 78% (03:04) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

based on 38 sessions

34% (01:33) correct 66% (01:29) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

based on 32 sessions

47% (01:09) correct 53% (01:43) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Selective Incapacitation
The latest prominent principle of criminal sentencing is that of "selective incapacitation". Selective incapacitation, like general incapacitation, involves sentencing with the goal of protecting the community from the crimes that an offender would commit if he were on the street. It differs from general incapacitation in its attempt to replace bluntness with selectivity.

Under a strategy of selective incapacitation, probation and short terms of incarceration are given to convicted offenders who are identified as being less likely to commit frequent and serious crimes, and longer terms of incarceration are given to those identified as more crime prone. Selective incapacitation has the potential for bringing about a reduction in crime without an increase in prison populations. This reduction could be substantial.

Reserving prison and jail space for the most criminally active offenders in some instances conflicts not only with other norms of legal justice, but with norms of social justice as well. If we reserve the sanction of incarceration only for the dangerous repeat offender, excluding the white collar offender and certain other criminals who pose no serious threat of physical injury to others, we may end up permitting harmful people from the middle class to evade a sanction that less privileged offenders cannot.

One of the most pervasive criticisms of selective incapacitation is that it is based on the statistical prediction of dangerousness; because such predictions are often erroneous, according to this point of view, they should not be used by the court. This criticism is related to both the nature of the errors and to the use of certain information for predicting a defendant‘s dangerousness. Let‘s first consider the nature of errors in prediction.

Prediction usually results in some successes and in two kinds of errors: "false positives"- and "false negatives". The problem of false positives in sentencing is costly primarily to incarcerated defendants who are not really so dangerous, while false negative predictions impose costs primarily on the victims of subsequent crimes committed by released defendants. In predicting whether a defendant will recidivate, the problem of false positives is widely regarded as especially serious, for many of the same reasons that it has been regarded in our society as better to release nine offenders than to convict one innocent person.

A tempting alternative is to reject prediction altogether; obviously, if we do not predict, then no errors of prediction are possible. A flaw in this logic is that, whether we like it or not-indeed, even if we tried to forbid it-criminal justice decisions are now, and surely always will be, based on predictions, and imperfect ones, at that. Attempts to discourage prediction in sentencing may in fact produce the worst of both worlds: the deceit of predictive sentencing disguised as something more tasteful, and inferior prediction as well. If we are to reserve at least some prison and jail space for the most criminally active offenders, then the prediction of criminal activity is an inescapable task. Is selective incapacitation truly an effective and appropriate proposal, an ―idea whose time has come,or is it a proposal that carries with it a potential for injustice?

1. Suppose the number of dangerous criminals that would be imprisoned under selective incapacitation but otherwise set free is greater than the number of harmless criminals who would be set free under selective incapacitation but otherwise imprisoned. How would this information be relevant to the passage?
A. It weakens the claim that the goal of selective incapacitation is to protect the community.
B. It strengthens the claim that there are more violent than non-violent criminals.
C. It weakens the claim that selective incapacitation would not increase prison populations.
D. It strengthens the claim that white-collar criminals unfairly receive shorter sentences.
E. It is of no relevance to the passage

Spoiler: :: OA
C

2. The author‘s statement that selective incapacitation may "end up permitting harmful people from the middle class to evade a sanction that less privileged offenders cannot" assumes that:
A. there are more offenders in the lower-class than in the middle-class.
B. the dangerous repeat offenders are lower-class and not middle-class.
C. harmful middle-class people can use their money to avoid prison.
D. lower-class offenders do not deserve to suffer incarceration.
E. the rich do not ever commit crimes

Spoiler: :: OA
B

3. Based on the passage, which of the following would most likely be cited by an opponent of statistical prediction as the reason that prediction should be abandoned?
A. The possibility of letting a dangerous criminal loose is too great.
B. The possibility of imprisoning a man who should be allowed to go free is too great.
C. The court makes more accurate decisions when statistics is employed.
D. Dangerousness has yet to be adequately defined as a legal concept.
E. Statistics is an inexact science
Spoiler: :: OA
B

_________________

oblige me with Kudos.

Originally posted by djanand on 03 Mar 2014, 12:11.
Last edited by workout on 29 Nov 2018, 17:41, edited 1 time in total.
Formatted, added timers
Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Posts: 42
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Marketing
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: Selective Incapacitation  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2017, 12:38
Can anyone please help me in question2. shouldn`t it be "C". as the paragraph is written in Negative sense(please correct me if i am wrong)

"Reserving prison and jail space for the most criminally active offenders in some instances conflicts not only with other norms of legal justice, but with norms of social justice as well. If we reserve the sanction of incarceration only for the dangerous repeat offender, excluding the white collar offender and certain other criminals who pose no serious threat of physical injury to others, we may end up permitting harmful people from the middle class to evade a sanction that less privileged offenders cannot."

The author‘s statement that selective incapacitation may "end up permitting harmful people from the middle class to evade a sanction that less privileged offenders cannot" assumes that:
A. there are more offenders in the lower-class than in the middle-class.
B. the dangerous repeat offenders are lower-class and not middle-class.
C. harmful middle-class people can use their money to avoid prison.
D. lower-class offenders do not deserve to suffer incarceration.
E. the rich do not ever commit crimes
[Obscure] Spoiler: OA
B
_________________

KUDOS PLEASE, If my post Helped you.
Thank you

Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 359
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
Schools: Booth '21 (D)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Re: Selective Incapacitation  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2018, 10:17
er.arun88 wrote:
Can anyone please help me in question2. shouldn`t it be "C". as the paragraph is written in Negative sense(please correct me if i am wrong)

"Reserving prison and jail space for the most criminally active offenders in some instances conflicts not only with other norms of legal justice, but with norms of social justice as well. If we reserve the sanction of incarceration only for the dangerous repeat offender, excluding the white collar offender and certain other criminals who pose no serious threat of physical injury to others, we may end up permitting harmful people from the middle class to evade a sanction that less privileged offenders cannot."

The author‘s statement that selective incapacitation may "end up permitting harmful people from the middle class to evade a sanction that less privileged offenders cannot" assumes that:
A. there are more offenders in the lower-class than in the middle-class.
B. the dangerous repeat offenders are lower-class and not middle-class.
C. harmful middle-class people can use their money to avoid prison.
D. lower-class offenders do not deserve to suffer incarceration.
E. the rich do not ever commit crimes
[Obscure] Spoiler: OA
B

it really isnt suggested that money can be used by to evade the prison time. What is said is suggested is that middle class people commit white collar crimes and that these are less dangerous than the crimes that are committed by the lower class.
Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2016
Posts: 239
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
GPA: 4
WE: Business Development (Other)
Re: Selective Incapacitation  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2018, 03:41
OEs..

1) An incorporation question with some difficult initial information to sift through. A quick vertical scan of the answer choices shows that you need to determine whether the information strengthens or weakens various arguments that the author makes. Since the claims in the choices are diverse, try to predict what would happen based on the information alone. If the information in the question is true, then more criminals will be going into prison than coming out. Looking for an answer choice that touches on this turns up (C). Of course, if the prison population is increasing, the claim that selective incapacitation would not increase the prison population is weakened.

(A): Opposite. If more dangerous criminals are being imprisoned, this claim would be strengthened.

(B): Out of Scope. This claim is never made, and the relative numbers of the imprisoned would have no effect on it even if it were.

(C): The correct answer

(D): Opposite. This opinion would be strengthened by the evidence that more dangerous criminals are justly receiving longer sentences.

(E): Incorrect, as described above

_________________

Regards
SandySilva

____________
Please appreciate the efforts by pressing +1 KUDOS (:

Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2016
Posts: 239
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
GPA: 4
WE: Business Development (Other)
Re: Selective Incapacitation  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2018, 03:42

2) Review the given lines in context. If the less privileged offenders are punished more severely, then they must be predicted to be more dangerous. (B) repeats this. Use the denial test to verify: If the dangerous repeat offenders were middle class instead of lower class, then the harmful people in the middle class would be imprisoned more often, which runs contrary to the author‘s point.

(A): Distortion. While there may be more dangerous offenders, this doesn‘t mean that there are more offenders overall.

(B): The correct answer

(C): Distortion. Though those in the middle class by definition have more money, there‘s no indication that they‘re using it to escape prison terms.

(D): Distortion. Though there may be class inequity in sentencing, this doesn‘t mean that all lower class offenders are undeserving of prison terms.

(E): Extreme language. The author never assumes this.

_________________

Regards
SandySilva

____________
Please appreciate the efforts by pressing +1 KUDOS (:

Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2016
Posts: 239
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
GPA: 4
WE: Business Development (Other)
Re: Selective Incapacitation  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2018, 03:43

3) Review the arguments that opponents of statistical prediction make. The main argument is that statistical prediction is unfair to the innocent. Only (B) matches this point.

(A): Opposite. As mentioned in ¶5, an opponent of prediction would be more in favour of letting a criminal go free than imprisoning an innocent person.

(B): The correct answer

(C): Out of Scope. The passage doesn‘t deal with this at all.

(D): Out of Scope. The passage doesn‘t deal with this at all.

(E): Out of Scope. The passage doesn‘t deal with this at all.

_________________

Regards
SandySilva

____________
Please appreciate the efforts by pressing +1 KUDOS (:

Intern
Joined: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 25
Location: Korea, Republic of
Re: Selective Incapacitation  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2018, 20:11
How B is the answer for question 3 ?

IMO is A, and cannot understand why I'm wrong.
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Posts: 127
Selective Incapacitation  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2018, 02:27
This passage is quite tough... could anyone clarify the 3rd? I am close enough to A as much as to B
Selective Incapacitation   [#permalink] 05 Dec 2018, 02:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Selective Incapacitation

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.