GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Oct 2018, 10:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The latest prominent principle of criminal sentencing is that of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 31 Aug 2016
Posts: 142
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
GPA: 2.81
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
The latest prominent principle of criminal sentencing is that of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2018, 18:33
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 7 sessions

43% (02:08) correct 57% (03:48) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 11 sessions

45% (00:30) correct 55% (01:24) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 9 sessions

56% (01:10) correct 44% (00:39) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

The latest prominent principle of criminal sentencing is that of "selective incapacitation." Selective incapacitation, like general incapacitation, involves sentencing with the goal of protecting the community from the crimes that an offender would commit if he were on the street. It differs from general incapacitation in its attempt to replace bluntness with selectivity.

Under a strategy of selective incapacitation, probation and short terms of incarceration are given to convicted offenders who are identified as being less likely to commit frequent and serious crimes, and longer terms of incarceration are given to those identified as more crime prone. Selective incapacitation has the potential for bringing about a reduction in crime without an increase in prison populations. This reduction could be substantial.

Reserving prison and jail space for the most criminally active offenders in some instances conflicts not only with other norms of legal justice, but with norms of social justice as well. If we reserve the sanction of incarceration only for the dangerous repeat offender, excluding the white collar offender and certain other criminals who pose no serious threat of physical injury to others, we may end up permitting harmful people from the middle class to evade a sanction that less privileged offenders cannot.

One of the most pervasive criticisms of selective incapacitation is that it is based on the statistical prediction of dangerousness; because such predictions are often erroneous, according to this point of view, they should not be used by the court. This criticism is related to both the nature of the errors and to the use of certain information for predicting a defendant‘s dangerousness. Let‘s first consider the nature of errors in prediction.

Prediction usually results in some successes and in two kinds of errors: "false positives" and "false negatives." The problem of false positives in sentencing is costly primarily to incarcerated defendants who are not really so dangerous, while false negative predictions impose costs primarily on the victims of subsequent crimes committed by released defendants. In predicting whether a defendant will recidivate, the problem of false positives is widely regarded as especially serious, for
many of the same reasons that it has been regarded in our society as better to release nine offenders than to convict one innocent person.

A tempting alternative is to reject prediction altogether; obviously, if we do not predict, then no errors of prediction are possible. A flaw in this logic is that, whether we like it or not—indeed, even if we tried to forbid it—criminal justice decisions are now, and surely always will be, based on predictions, and imperfect ones, at that. Attempts to discourage prediction in sentencing may in fact produce the worst of both worlds: the deceit of predictive sentencing disguised as something more tasteful, and inferior prediction as well. If we are to reserve at least some prison and jail space for the most criminally active offenders, then the prediction of criminal activity is an inescapable task. Is selective incapacitation truly an effective and appropriate proposal, an "idea whose time has come," or is it a proposal that carries with it a potential for injustice?

1. Suppose the number of dangerous criminals that would be imprisoned under selective incapacitation but otherwise set free is greater than the number of harmless criminals who would be set free under selective incapacitation but otherwise imprisoned. How would this information be relevant to the passage?

A. It weakens the claim that the goal of selective incapacitation is to protect the community.

B. It strengthens the claim that there are more violent than non-violent criminals.

C. It weakens the claim that selective incapacitation would not increase prison populations.

D. It strengthens the claim that white-collar criminals unfairly receive shorter sentences.

E. It is of no relevance to the passage


2. The author‘s statement that selective incapacitation may "end up permitting harmful people from the middle class to evade a sanction that less privileged offenders cannot" assumes that:

A. there are more offenders in the lower-class than in the middle-class.

B. the dangerous repeat offenders are lower-class and not middle-class.

C. harmful middle-class people can use their money to avoid prison.

D. lower-class offenders do not deserve to suffer incarceration.

E. the rich do not ever commit crimes


3. Based on the passage, which of the following would most likely be cited by an opponent of statistical prediction as the reason that prediction should be abandoned?

A. The possibility of letting a dangerous criminal loose is too great.

B. The possibility of imprisoning a man who should be allowed to go free is too great.

C. The court makes more accurate decisions when statistics is employed.

D. Dangerousness has yet to be adequately defined as a legal concept.

E. Statistics is an inexact science


_________________

Resources
GMATNinja Webinars
GMATNinja Chats

Quant
Mixtures

Senior RC Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: Perfecting myself for GMAT
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 770
Concentration: Nonprofit
Schools: Haas '21
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: The latest prominent principle of criminal sentencing is that of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2018, 21:08

+1 kudos to the posts containing answer explanations of all questions


_________________

If you like my post press kudos +1

New - RC Butler - 2 RC's everyday

Tag me in RC questions if you need help. Please provide your analysis of the question in the post along with the tag.

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 28 May 2018
Posts: 63
The latest prominent principle of criminal sentencing is that of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2018, 21:45
Hi workout,

Can you please help me understand Q1

Suppose the number of dangerous criminals that would be imprisoned under selective incapacitation but otherwise set free is greater than the number of harmless criminals who would be set free under selective incapacitation but otherwise imprisoned..

Rephrasing Question from my understanding - The dangerous criminals who should be imprisoned are set free and the harmless criminals who should be free are imprisoned.

So in this way :
A. It weakens the claim that the goal of selective incapacitation is to protect the community. - This should be correct.
GMAT Club Bot
The latest prominent principle of criminal sentencing is that of &nbs [#permalink] 28 Sep 2018, 21:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The latest prominent principle of criminal sentencing is that of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.