SKas07
"Investors are overlooking two shortcomings in China’s approach. The first is the nature of top-down diktats about supply, which lack flexibility and therefore tend to generate volatile outcomes"
Shouldn't it be "lacks flexibility and therefore tends to generate.."?
What does the ",which" refer to? Is it not the "nature"?
From the way the sentence is written I'm assuming the plural form of "lack" and "tend" refers to "diktats" but I just don't know how to justify that.
Can someone please explain? Trying to understand the role of ",which" after a prepositional clause.
Thanks!
You're right that
which refers to
diktats. Think about it: the
nature cannot be expected to
lack flexibility, nor can
supply. Therefore, we're left with
diktats as the logical noun for
which.
The comma after
supply is expected, as we want to use
which to talk about
diktats in general. If we did not use a comma and went with (let's say)
that, we would be referring to some very specific
diktats.
Diktats, which... (
all diktats)
The diktats that... (
particular diktats)