bvik
"The following appeared in an announcement issued by the publisher of The Mercury, a weekly newspaper.“Since a competing lower-priced newspaper, The Bugle, was started five years ago, The Mercury’s circulation has declined by 10,000 readers. The best way to get more people to read The Mercury is to reduce its price below that of The Bugle, at least until circulation increases to former levels. The increased circulation of The Mercury will attract more businesses to buy advertising
space in the paper.”
------------------------------------------
The publisher has stated that the decrease of Mercury's subscription over Bugle is primarily due to the price difference. Moreover, The mercury newspaper has seen a decline of 10,000 subscriptions over the last five years. The publisher has also stated that, decreasing Mercury's price lower than Bugle would increase sales which helps in more advertising space and revenue. I find the reasoning provided by the publisher flawed and i explain the reasons in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, the article assumed that the decline is primarily due to the lower price offered by the Bugle than Mercury News. I find this reason quite flawed because, Bulge news paper could be publishing completely different news content than mercury and targeting different sections of the user groups. Moreover Bugle could be publishing less number of pages compared to mercury which has more pages which increase the production cost. It is also not stated if price was the only differentiating factor between the two news papers. This assumption is wrong.
Secondly, the article has not provided any data on the user subscriptions between the two news papers. If the subscriptions of Mercury news is in millions compared to Bugle which is if lower than Mercury than 10,000 subscriptions may not be a huge decline. However mercury news has to analyze on the decline. This could be due to a new editorial started by Bugle Or a new sports editions or some other factors.
Thirdly, there is no evidence of any increase in businesses spending more money on advertising. Had the publisher provide any evidence through research statistics or some sort reducing the price for mercury news may be a hasty decision.
Finally, had the article provided more information on type of readers between the two news papers, any external factors influencing the decline of Mercury news or another data, mercury news should not reduce the price. Therefore, the announcement issued by the publisher is seriously flawed.
Appreciate the help.
Regards,
Vik
Hi Vik,
Overall, this essay gets a 3. It's got good structure and decent points, but several things hold it back. Proofread; lower-case "i" (not that you should use "I" at all!) and "bulge" instead of "bugle" show up in your first two paragraphs. Explore your points in MUCH more depth. You state in your fourth paragraph that there is no evidence that increased circulation will lead to increased advertising business, but this ignores the fact that circulation affecting advertising revenue is common sense! Of course, you are correct to specify that he doesn't explain how much and how well it will affect that revenue, but your explanation isn't satisfactory. And finally, your transitions are weak--most notably, "finally" in your last paragraph implies you are continuing your list of flaws when you are in fact shifting into your conclusion.
There is a core of a solid essay here, but it needs a lot of polish. Take a look at my advice, and some higher-scoring essays on this site, and I look forward to seeing your next attempt!
Regards,