Last visit was: 17 Jul 2025, 04:45 It is currently 17 Jul 2025, 04:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
RohitKalla
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Last visit: 07 Jun 2013
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
499
 [45]
Given Kudos: 14
GPA: 8.4
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 46
Kudos: 499
 [45]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
42
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Basshead
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Last visit: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 927
Own Kudos:
287
 [5]
Given Kudos: 432
Location: United States
Posts: 927
Kudos: 287
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
tastysweets2003
Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Last visit: 09 Dec 2011
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 4
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
khushboochhabra
Joined: 08 May 2011
Last visit: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
GMAT Date: 04-28-2012
Posts: 5
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To me D seems to be the answer as - C talks both about Horizontal and vertical price management. But the author focuses on vertical prize management and has been describing that with unilateral action not being covered the manaufcator can not expect any response from retailor for price management and this leaves the manafactur/sales person with stating a policy for which they can not expect a "OK" - response. Thus authro would agree to cover unilateral action
User avatar
akbism
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Last visit: 30 Jul 2019
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
72
 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
Status:Struggling hard to maintain focus
Location: Kolkata
Concentration: General Management , Enterprenureship
Schools:ISB, IIM
GMAT 2: 690  Q50  V34
GPA: 3.93
Posts: 75
Kudos: 72
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The law
does not extend to unilateral action. So long
as the manufacturer’s policies and behaviors
40 do not go beyond these accepted unilateral
actions, there is no illegal activity.
However, this result has left the field in
virtually total disarray.
The focus on
unilateral action versus combined action
45 puts otherwise sane sales people in the
peculiar position of trying to state a policy to
Quote:

Explanation- the law is not extended to unilateral action, which has caused disarray....
User avatar
rampuria
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Last visit: 06 May 2019
Posts: 149
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: Kolkata
Concentration: Strategic Management
Schools:La Martiniere for Boys
Posts: 149
Kudos: 306
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This emphasis on unilateral action stems
35 from the fact that the antitrust laws prohibit
only contracts, combinations and
conspiracies
in restraint of trade. The law
does not extend to unilateral action. So long
as the manufacturer’s policies and behaviors
40 do not go beyond these accepted unilateral
actions, there is no illegal activity.
However, this result has left the field in
virtually total disarray. The focus on
unilateral action versus combined action
.....

The author is trying to mean that law applies to contracts and conspiracies but not to unilateral action. Only unilateral action is permitted while conspiracies and contracts are deemed illegal. This situation demands revision, preferably removal of ban on contracts and conspiracies so that manufacturers can get "OK" ( written consent) from retailers. This will prevent unitended illegalitie sin the trade.

E is the winner.

Its not C because author does not talk about horizontal parts.
avatar
miliya23
Joined: 14 Jul 2015
Last visit: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 10
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Answer should "D".
This emphasis on unilateral action stems from the fact that the antitrust laws prohibit only contracts, combinations and conspiracies in restraint of trade. The law does not extend to unilateral action

3rd paragraph is saying that rules are only applied on conspiracies, contracts, and combinations and not to unilateral action . It has never mentioned that these rules should be removed from conspiracies also. "E" is saying the same.

D) Extending the law to cover unilateral action would be a positive step in improving the current state of regulation

D clearly implies that author is not happy with the fact that there is no rule applied to unilateral facts. Hence, it will be considered as a positive move by Author
User avatar
Nightmare007
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Last visit: 05 Aug 2020
Posts: 438
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 438
Kudos: 428
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi abhimahna, GMATNinja, daagh
I chose C for the below mentioned reasons>

This emphasis on unilateral action stems from the fact that the antitrust laws prohibit only contracts, combinations and conspiracies in restraint of trade. The law does not extend to unilateral action. So long as the manufacturer's policies and behaviors do not go beyond these accepted unilateral actions, there is no illegal activity. However, this result has left the field in virtually total disarray. The focus on unilateral action versus combined action puts otherwise sane sales people in the peculiar position of trying to state a policy to an existing or potential retailer but being required to avoid receiving so much as an ok in response. Without substantial reform of these rules, the continuing uncertainty and counterintuitive results will inevitably lead to completely unintended illegal behavior on the part of confused corporate entities.

So, I thought answer should be D.

Can you please spare some time to explain why the answer is E?
And where my reasoning is wrong.

Thank you
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,222
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 783
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,222
Kudos: 738
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RohitKalla
Since the dawning of antitrust regulation in America at the beginning of the twentieth century, agreements establishing resale price maintenance have been considered expressly illegal. Unlike horizontal price fixing between competitors, however, where there are no exceptions to a blanket ban on such activity, certain types of vertically integrated price maintenance schemes have been held not to violate the law.

The current rule, the so-called Colgate doctrine named after one of the first major corporate litigants, provides that a manufacturer may state a pricing policy and refuse to deal with those who do not abide by it so long as no actual agreement is made. For example, a manufacturer is allowed to unilaterally establish a specific price at which it would like the retailers to resell its product. It may also state that it will terminate any retailer who fails to abide by its pricing policy. The manufacturer is even allowed to follow through by terminating any noncomplying retailers. The manufacturer is not, however, allowed to do anything beyond the flat statement of its pricing policy and a possible, but undiscussed, termination of the retailer. Any attempt by the manufacturer to obtain the retailer's agreement or its promise of acquiescence to the pricing policy goes beyond the approved unilateral action and will therefore be considered illegal.

This emphasis on unilateral action stems from the fact that the antitrust laws prohibit only contracts, combinations and conspiracies in restraint of trade. The law does not extend to unilateral action. So long as the manufacturer's policies and behaviors do not go beyond these accepted unilateral actions, there is no illegal activity. However, this result has left the field in virtually total disarray. The focus on unilateral action versus combined action puts otherwise sane sales people in the peculiar position of trying to state a policy to an existing or potential retailer but being required to avoid receiving so much as an ok in response. Without substantial reform of these rules, the continuing uncertainty and counterintuitive results will inevitably lead to completely unintended illegal behavior on the part of confused corporate entities.
With which of the following choices would the author be most likely to agree?
A)Price maintenance policies are a rational approach by manufacturers seeking to maximize their profitability and control over their products in the retail market.
B) The Colgate doctrine is an ill advised attempt to meddle in internal corporate matters that should be left to the competence of the corporate managers.
C) The law should be revised to allow vertical and horizontal price maintenance.
D) Extending the law to cover unilateral action would be a positive step in improving the current state of regulation.
E) Eliminating the ban on combinations and conspiracies would be a positive step in improving the current state of regulation.





Please Explain why the answer is what it is.

VeritasKarishma GMATNinja mikemcgarry egmat
daagh
Can you please discuss this passage especially the last paragraph as to what it intends to convey ?
Also please throw some light on this question .
User avatar
altairahmad
Joined: 27 Mar 2017
Last visit: 29 Jul 2021
Posts: 265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 406
Location: Saudi Arabia
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
GPA: 3.36
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Posts: 265
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Both D and E have the same result, one covers the unilateral regulation while the other removes combinations and conspiracies altogether.I don't think it is clear in the passage that the author prefers which one.
avatar
aalphabet
Joined: 17 Aug 2017
Last visit: 30 Sep 2024
Posts: 8
Posts: 8
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don't get it.. why is it E and not D
avatar
ballest127
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 27 Dec 2021
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 599
Posts: 115
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Expert,

Could you please post OE for Q1-Q2?

Thank you.
User avatar
ayushgmatclub1
Joined: 11 Jan 2018
Last visit: 08 May 2022
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 337
Posts: 57
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
my 2 cents on Q1

Q1-
We need to cover combinations (not just unilateral, we are already covering unilateral)
Option D - cover unilateral (we are already covering unilateral, hence incorrect)
Option E - remove ban from combination (or cover combination, hence correct)

still need help with Q2- (i got this wrong)
I think the passage is talking about recent antitrust "regulation", which is a modification of an old antitrust "law"? Experts please help.
It is as difficult to reject E as to accept A
avatar
prawin96
Joined: 14 Sep 2018
Last visit: 27 Mar 2024
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanations for the questions
User avatar
Nups1324
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Last visit: 12 Sep 2023
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 353
Posts: 105
Kudos: 58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
basshead
My thoughts:

First paragraph: Agreements establishing price maintenance are considered illegal. However, there are exceptions -- some activities don't actually break the law.

Second paragraph: Colgate doctrine allows manufacturers to establish a specific price unilaterally, which means to a whole group. However, the manufacturer can't go further than establishing a pricing policy (and perhaps a termination of their agreement). This means the manufacturer can set a pricing policy but can't take further actions, such as frequently calling the retailer, etc.

Third paragraph: This situation puts manufacturers/salespeople in a difficult spot. If they can't take any further actions, manufacturers can't openly communicate with retailers, even regarding things that aren't regarding price, because the discussion may lead to unintended illegal behavior.

___________________

1). With which of the following choices would the author be most likely to agree?

A)Price maintenance policies are a rational approach by manufacturers seeking to maximize their profitability and control over their products in the retail market.
B) The Colgate doctrine is an ill advised attempt to meddle in internal corporate matters that should be left to the competence of the corporate managers.
C) The law should be revised to allow vertical and horizontal price maintenance.
D) Extending the law to cover unilateral action would be a positive step in improving the current state of regulation.
E) Eliminating the ban on combinations and conspiracies would be a positive step in improving the current state of regulation.

The author is looking for reform of these laws. D wants to add regulation, which is not what the author is looking to achieve. E fits the bill -- the author wants to remove the ban and completely reform these rules.

2) Which of the following can be inferred about retail price maintenance?

A) Antitrust law has a long history in America.
B) If the restraints on combined actions are not modified, consumer prices will increase as beleaguered manufacturers pass on the costs of compliance to consumers.
C) Manufacturers need to form a more efficient lobby to affect policy and reverse irrational restrictions.
D) Notwithstanding differing legal treatments, there are no substantial differences between horizontal and vertical pricing arrangements.
E) Irrational regulation is a significant cause of unintended illegal behavior on the part of many corporations.

The first paragraph speaks to the long history of antitrust regulation. We can't infer answer E -- the wording is too strong. We don't know if irrational regulation is a significant cause of unintended illegal behavior on the part of many corporations. Best answer is A.

Good one basshead . I answered these two incorrectly and selected the same 2 wrong options with most responses. I was wondering where will I find the explanation and there your explanation was. You saved my day. Thank you :) Keep posting.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
StarTrooper
Joined: 14 Sep 2020
Last visit: 18 May 2022
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is good. Good tough passage. Just curious to know the level of the first two questions. 750+ or like 800 :|
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 15,854
Own Kudos:
46,480
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,083
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,854
Kudos: 46,480
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RanjeetRRoy
It is good. Good tough passage. Just curious to know the level of the first two questions. 750+ or like 800 :|

I am afraid if the OA there for question 1 and 2 are given correct, haven't attempted the passage though. In my opinion the difficulty of the passage should be as follow:

Question #1: 750-800
Question #2: 750-800
Question #3: 700
Question #4: 650

Overall: 700-750
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,448
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,448
Kudos: 954
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
15854 posts