Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Dec 1410:00 AM EST
-12:00 PM EST
Think a 100% GMAT Verbal score is out of your reach? Target Test Prep will make you think again! Our course uses techniques such as topical study and spaced repetition to maximize knowledge retention and make studying simple and fun.
Dec 1411:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this session to learn how to Deconstruct arguments, Pre-Think Author’s Assumptions, and apply Negation Test.
Dec 1310:00 AM EST
-12:00 PM EST
Have you ever wondered how to score a PERFECT 805 on the GMAT? Meet Julia, a banking professional who used the Target Test Prep course to achieve this incredible feat. Julia's story is nothing short of an inspiration.- Dec 15
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Dec 1608:00 AM PST
-11:59 PM PST
GMAT Club 12 Days of Christmas is a 4th Annual GMAT Club Winter Competition based on solving questions. This is the Winter GMAT competition on GMAT Club with an amazing opportunity to win over $40,000 worth of prizes!- Dec 17
09:00 AM PST
-10:00 AM PST
Join Manhattan Prep instructor Whitney Garner for a fun—and thorough—review of logic-based (non-math) problems, with a particular emphasis on Data Sufficiency and Two-Parts. - Dec 18
10:00 AM PST
-11:00 AM PST
Here is the essential guide to securing scholarships as an MBA student! In this video, we explore the various types of scholarships available, including need-based and merit-based options.
Hi,
what if in an SC question, we are asked to choose between
slim vs less chance
or
fat vs greater chance
what will be the right option?
Since chance is a unit of measure(probability) ideally it should be greater or less(depending on the question). But colloquially slim\fat chance is also considered right. Is the GMAT for or against this?
Also
in place of lesser, if we're given an option to choose between
lesser vs lower
lesser vs smaller
greater vs cooler
greater vs higher
greater vs larger
fewer vs meager
more vs exceeding
more vs larger
what will be the correct usage? I understand a lot of it depends on usage. But if we're given a sentence e.g.
The interest rates this year are lower than last year's.
vs
The interest rates this year are lesser than last year's.
Which one is correct according to gmat?
humbly request experts to intervene.
what if in an SC question, we are asked to choose between
slim vs less chance
or
fat vs greater chance
what will be the right option?
Since chance is a unit of measure(probability) ideally it should be greater or less(depending on the question). But colloquially slim\fat chance is also considered right. Is the GMAT for or against this?
Also
in place of lesser, if we're given an option to choose between
lesser vs lower
lesser vs smaller
greater vs cooler
greater vs higher
greater vs larger
fewer vs meager
more vs exceeding
more vs larger
what will be the correct usage? I understand a lot of it depends on usage. But if we're given a sentence e.g.
The interest rates this year are lower than last year's.
vs
The interest rates this year are lesser than last year's.
Which one is correct according to gmat?
humbly request experts to intervene.
08 Jun 2017, 16:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
Dear Kaal,
I'm happy to help.
First of all, "slim chance" and "fat chance" are highly colloquial phrases that appear in American conversation English, but these are very informal and would never appear on the GMAT. BTW, in American spoken English, "fat chance" is almost always used sarcastically to implie its opposite.
"Is Chris going to watch the baseball game with us?" -- "Fat chance! He hates baseball!"
The GMAT might speak of "more/less likely" or a "higher/lower probability." Using the word "chance" to describe probabilities at all sounds a little colloquial, not quite as well-spoken as the GMAT would be.
For ordinary numbers, math numbers, we use "greater" and "less."
For measurements (temperature, speed, etc.), we sometimes use "higher" and "lower." This would also be correct for "interest rates."
In formal contexts, "smaller" and "larger" are used for physical size. In more colloquial contexts, these might be used for numerical comparisons, but I don't think I have seen this use on the GMAT. I will say that "a larger number" sounds considerably more natural than "a smaller number." Also, the term "bigger number" sounds like grade-school speak, not what we would expect from intelligent adults.
The word "lesser" is particularly interesting--this is never used for numerical comparisons or comparisons of physical size. It almost always used for questions of virtue, moral worth, artistic merit--something more philosophical. The word has a very negative disparaging connotation--it's a well-spoken way to deliver a deep insult. For example, someone might say, "A is a musical genius, but B is a lesser artist." Since the GMAT steers clear of any controversy, I have never seen the word "lesser" on any official question.
Similarly, the word "meager" denotes a small number, but it has a disparaging connection.
"The politician's first rally had a small turnout." -- factual, value-neutral, as a newspaper might report
"The politician's first rally had a meager turnout." -- disparaging, implying that there's something wrong here
Most of the other numerical comparative words are value-neutral, but "lesser" and "meager" definitely have some emotional charge to them.
Does all this make sense?
Mike
I'm happy to help.
First of all, "slim chance" and "fat chance" are highly colloquial phrases that appear in American conversation English, but these are very informal and would never appear on the GMAT. BTW, in American spoken English, "fat chance" is almost always used sarcastically to implie its opposite.
"Is Chris going to watch the baseball game with us?" -- "Fat chance! He hates baseball!"
The GMAT might speak of "more/less likely" or a "higher/lower probability." Using the word "chance" to describe probabilities at all sounds a little colloquial, not quite as well-spoken as the GMAT would be.
For ordinary numbers, math numbers, we use "greater" and "less."
For measurements (temperature, speed, etc.), we sometimes use "higher" and "lower." This would also be correct for "interest rates."
In formal contexts, "smaller" and "larger" are used for physical size. In more colloquial contexts, these might be used for numerical comparisons, but I don't think I have seen this use on the GMAT. I will say that "a larger number" sounds considerably more natural than "a smaller number." Also, the term "bigger number" sounds like grade-school speak, not what we would expect from intelligent adults.
The word "lesser" is particularly interesting--this is never used for numerical comparisons or comparisons of physical size. It almost always used for questions of virtue, moral worth, artistic merit--something more philosophical. The word has a very negative disparaging connotation--it's a well-spoken way to deliver a deep insult. For example, someone might say, "A is a musical genius, but B is a lesser artist." Since the GMAT steers clear of any controversy, I have never seen the word "lesser" on any official question.
Similarly, the word "meager" denotes a small number, but it has a disparaging connection.
"The politician's first rally had a small turnout." -- factual, value-neutral, as a newspaper might report
"The politician's first rally had a meager turnout." -- disparaging, implying that there's something wrong here
Most of the other numerical comparative words are value-neutral, but "lesser" and "meager" definitely have some emotional charge to them.
Does all this make sense?
Mike
Moderators:
