Last visit was: 15 Dec 2024, 02:37 It is currently 15 Dec 2024, 02:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mbamantra
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Last visit: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 170
Own Kudos:
159
 []
Location: sydney
Posts: 170
Kudos: 159
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pitts20042006
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Last visit: 12 Jun 2005
Posts: 175
Own Kudos:
Location: USA
Posts: 175
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bat_car
Joined: 04 Oct 2003
Last visit: 21 Feb 2004
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
3
 []
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 25
Kudos: 3
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mbamantra
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Last visit: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 170
Own Kudos:
Location: sydney
Posts: 170
Kudos: 159
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kaplan also says that choices should be in the scope of the original argument. What if researchers FAILED to find , i mean though evidence exists but they FAILED to find. if i go by Kaplan's methodology choice C is out of scope.

By the way official ans is C and this question is from 8000score.
User avatar
mohnish104
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Last visit: 19 Apr 2014
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 291
Posts: 144
Kudos: 901
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Clearly C is the only answer that logically weakens the argument. The rest are either out of scope or illogical.
User avatar
arirux92
Joined: 03 May 2015
Last visit: 30 Nov 2016
Posts: 128
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.49
WE:Web Development (Insurance)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mbamantra
Some religious traditions have opposed the representation of the human form in religious art. In particular, the representation of divine personages with human characteristics is seen as demeaning to those who do not share the gender, racial, ethnic, age or other human characteristics portrayed in the representations of divine personages.
Which of the following, if true, would constitute a logical challenge to the validity of these concerns?

A) Religious traditions are emotional and not logical.

B) Religious art without the human form is meaningless.

C) Research has failed to find anyone who shows evidence of being demeaned by representation of divine personages.

D) Most religions do not oppose the representation of the human form.

E) All people are equal in the eyes of God.


Stem : Representation of divine art in human form is demeaning to those who do not share particular characteristics.

But what if there is nobody who actually feels bad... this breaks the entire argument. You are saying A because of B. But if B is not proven to exist, can A be true?

C attacks this logic.

C.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,001
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,001
Kudos: 902
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts