Last visit was: 22 Jul 2024, 22:34 It is currently 22 Jul 2024, 22:34
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4561
Own Kudos [?]: 33631 [22]
Given Kudos: 4569
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4561
Own Kudos [?]: 33631 [9]
Given Kudos: 4569
General Discussion
Current Student
Joined: 09 Jun 2012
Posts: 76
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.7
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4561
Own Kudos [?]: 33631 [0]
Given Kudos: 4569
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
In choice A, there is no relationship suggested between the size of the Sun and its ability to have a white dwarf. Choices B and D create unwarranted linkages between Type I and Type II supernovas. In choice E, even if the Sun does become a red giant before becoming a white dwarf, it does not mean that it will become a supernova.

Hope is clear
Intern
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 149 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: United States
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
3rd question - i am not very satisfied with C. C says sun is typified as a supernova II. but first paragraph says supernova is an event. i somehow like B better for 3 as it as 1. even if, 2. does not classify as a supernova

Quote:
B) Even if the Sun were paired with a white dwarf, the Sun does not have the mass
necessary to create sufficient electromagnetic radiation.
C) The Sun is not a white dwarf with a companion star orbiting it, nor does it have the
size to qualify as a Type II supernova
Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 71
Own Kudos [?]: 343 [0]
Given Kudos: 95
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT Date: 09-28-2012
WE:Accounting (Manufacturing)
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
A A C B

Grateful if you can well, argue against A. Because 2 schemas are described and contrasted too. One explodes the parent star, the other leaves the stellar core.
Then, obviously giving them the name Type I & type II means the schemes are different.
I think D can be right, but why not A?

Perhaps because 1. they are not overlapping??. Secondly, It is only 1 scheme / schema and not two as A suggests. And that schema has 2 types of supernovas.
Instead of contrasting exactly, it explains how the types work.
Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
Which of the following best summarizes the author’s answer to the question: Is the Sun in danger of becoming a supernova?
A) The Sun is too large to have a white dwarf as a partner and lacks the physical size required to become a red giant.
B) Even if the Sun were paired with a white dwarf, the Sun does not have the mass necessary to create sufficient electromagnetic radiation.
C) The Sun is not a white dwarf with a companion star orbiting it, nor does it have the size to qualify as a Type II supernova.
D) Without a white dwarf orbiting the Sun, the Sun has no obvious way to increase its size to become a Type II supernova.
E) The Sun will inevitably become a supernova once it passes from a red giant to white dwarf but not for at least a billion years.

I am wondering about C in detail:it mentioned the "size" to qualify as Type 2, whereas the passage used the word "mass" and I don't think it quite the same meaning.
Can anyone help me there??
Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.27
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
carcass wrote:
D A C B are the OA.

D

The new schema is based on the distinction between Type I and Type II supernovas; the original
schema is one based on the absence of hydrogen (Type I) or the presence of hydrogen (Type II). The
example of the Sun is provided as support for how the classification system works. Choice D best
summarizes this structure.

A

this one is maybe the trickiest. we have from the passage Electromagnetic radiation — energy that is electric and
magnetic — causes the star to explode in a supernova.
and not In a Type II supernova, energy and electromagnetic radiation causes a star to collapse
and explode.
. Electromagnetic = energy + magnetic not energy and electromagnetic = radiation

Answer choice C describes accurately and completely the author’s view in the final paragraph. The
Sun is not a binary star because it doesn’t have companion star orbiting it, so it can’t qualify as a Type
I supernova. Nor does the Sun have the size necessary to become a Type II supernova (it would have to
be at least 1.4 times its own size).

B

A take away here is this: even though there isn't a main idea question on the passage is worth to ask yourself ALWAYS what is the topic, scope, and purpose of the passage. The topic is supernovas.

The scope is Type I and Type II supernovas. The purpose is to describe a new schema for classifying Type I and Type II supernovas.

Kudos if you liked my post

Hi Carcass

Brilliant work as always !

In above RC you just mentioned D as the correct choice without explaining why others are incorrect . I agree in Ques 2...D has
word play which makes it incorrect...but how come first option is correct ? Off course old classification is necessarily incompatible with new one .
Intern
Joined: 02 Oct 2015
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
Regarding Q2 -

Option D is wrong since it states - In a Type II supernova, energy and electromagnetic radiation causes a star to collapse and explode.
collapse is wrongly stated here. As per the passage - Electromagnetic radiation — energy that is electric and magnetic — causes the star to explode in a supernova.

Option A is best among the rest as in the passage the classification schema never states anything wrt hydrogen. Its just an another classification. So we can't say that
classification schema is either compatible or incompatible with the hydrogen concept.
Intern
Joined: 26 Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
Quote:
According to the passage, which statement or statements below are true?
I. The energy created from a Type II explosion is greater than the energy created by a Type I explosion.
II. The sun is not a binary star.
III.Both Type I and Type II supernovas result in the complete destruction of the exploding star.
A) I only
B) II only
C) I and III only
D) II and III only
E) I, II, and III

B? What? It's D in my opinion. Read the first sentence of the whole passage: "Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and result in the complete disruption of stars at the end of their lives.".
Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 94
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
Tough passage carcass

I need help with Q3, (E) captures the idea completely ... whereas (C) just mentions that the sun doesn't meet type 1 or type 2 criteria, but no info on where the sun can be a supernova or no ... so should the answer be (E)??

carcass wrote:
Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and result in the complete disruption of stars at the end of their lives. Originally, the distinction between Type I and Type II supernovas was based solely on the presence or absence of hydrogen atoms (hydrogen lines). Supernovas without hydrogen lines were called Type I, while those with hydrogen lines were Type II. Subsequent analysis of many of these events revealed that this empirical classification schema instead reflected two different mechanisms for the supernova explosion.

Type I supernovas happen in binary stars — two stars that orbit closely each other — when one of the two binary stars is a small, dense, white dwarf star. If the companion star ranges too close to the white dwarf that it is orbiting, the white dwarf’s gravitational pull will draw matter from the other star. When the white dwarf acquires enough matter to become at least 1.4 times as big as the Sun, it collapses and explodes in a supernova.

Type II supernovas occur when a star, much more massive than the Sun, ends its life. When such a star begins burning out, the core of the star quickly collapses releasing amazing energy in the form of neutrinos, a kind of particle smaller than even an atom. Electromagnetic radiation — energy that is electric and magnetic — causes the star to explode in a supernova. Whereas Type I supernovas typically destroy their parent stars, Type II explosions usually leave behind the stellar core.

The classification schema regarding the mechanism for supernova explosions helps to more succinctly answer the question: Is the Sun in danger of becoming a supernova? Neither does our Sun have a companion star orbiting it nor does our Sun have the mass necessary to become a supernova. Furthermore, it will be another billion years until the Sun runs out of fuel and swells into a red giant star before going into a white dwarf form.
How is this passage organized?
A)A single phenomenon is introduced and two overlapping classification schemas are contrasted.
B)An original theory is mentioned before being overturned as a result of new findings.
C)Two complementary mechanisms for describing a single phenomenon are discussed and a conclusion is offered.
D)A new classification schema is described and an example of how it works is provided.
E)Two different classification systems are outlined and a question posed to help reconcile both.

It can be inferred from the passage that
A)Classifying a Type I or Type II event based on the presence or absence of hydrogen is not necessarily incompatible with a classification schema based on the mechanism
by which these two events explode.
B) A dense white dwarf’s gravitational pull on its companion star causes the companion star to collapse and explode as a supernova.
C) Before a star such as the Sun can become a red giant, it must first become a white dwarf.
D) In a Type II supernova, energy and electromagnetic radiation causes a star to collapse and explode.
E) Supernovas are rare events in our universe.

Which of the following best summarizes the author’s answer to the question: Is the Sun in danger of becoming a supernova?
A) The Sun is too large to have a white dwarf as a partner and lacks the physical size required to become a red giant.
B) Even if the Sun were paired with a white dwarf, the Sun does not have the mass necessary to create sufficient electromagnetic radiation.
C) The Sun is not a white dwarf with a companion star orbiting it, nor does it have the size to qualify as a Type II supernova.
D) Without a white dwarf orbiting the Sun, the Sun has no obvious way to increase its size to become a Type II supernova.
E) The Sun will inevitably become a supernova once it passes from a red giant to white dwarf but not for at least a billion years.

According to the passage, which statement or statements below are true?
I. The energy created from a Type II explosion is greater than the energy created by a Type I explosion.
II. The sun is not a binary star.
III.Both Type I and Type II supernovas result in the complete destruction of the exploding star.
A) I only
B) II only
C) I and III only
D) II and III only
E) I, II, and III

OA after discussion. A pretty tough passage. Enjoy
Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 732 [0]
Given Kudos: 155
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
Q2) It can be inferred from the passage that
A)Classifying a Type I or Type II event based on the presence or absence of hydrogen is not necessarily incompatible with a classification schema based on the mechanism
by which these two events explode.
B) A dense white dwarf’s gravitational pull on its companion star causes the companion star to collapse and explode as a supernova.
C) Before a star such as the Sun can become a red giant, it must first become a white dwarf.
D) In a Type II supernova, energy and electromagnetic radiation causes a star to collapse and explode.
E) Supernovas are rare events in our universe.

Why cant the ans be E) ?? Can someone please explain the OA which is A)

Q3) Which of the following best summarizes the author’s answer to the question: Is the Sun in danger of becoming a supernova?
A) The Sun is too large to have a white dwarf as a partner and lacks the physical size required to become a red giant.
B) Even if the Sun were paired with a white dwarf, the Sun does not have the mass necessary to create sufficient electromagnetic radiation.
C) The Sun is not a white dwarf with a companion star orbiting it, nor does it have the size to qualify as a Type II supernova.
D) Without a white dwarf orbiting the Sun, the Sun has no obvious way to increase its size to become a Type II supernova.
E) The Sun will inevitably become a supernova once it passes from a red giant to white dwarf but not for at least a billion years.

I get why C) is the ans but what is wrong with E), doesnt the author mention this exactly in the last para?

Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2015
Posts: 135
Own Kudos [?]: 295 [0]
Given Kudos: 453
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 700 Q44 V41
WE:Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
Why is it choice B and not C..

The first sentence of the whole passage says: "Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and result in the complete disruption of stars at the end of their lives.".
Intern
Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
carcass

I was confused between A and C.

Not convinced with D as answer choice.
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2017
Posts: 54
Own Kudos [?]: 508 [0]
Given Kudos: 74
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
carcass wrote:
Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and result in the complete disruption of stars at the end of their lives. Originally, the distinction between Type I and Type II supernovas was based solely on the presence or absence of hydrogen atoms (hydrogen lines). Supernovas without hydrogen lines were called Type I, while those with hydrogen lines were Type II. Subsequent analysis of many of these events revealed that this empirical classification schema instead reflected two different mechanisms for the supernova explosion.

Type I supernovas happen in binary stars — two stars that orbit closely each other — when one of the two binary stars is a small, dense, white dwarf star. If the companion star ranges too close to the white dwarf that it is orbiting, the white dwarf’s gravitational pull will draw matter from the other star. When the white dwarf acquires enough matter to become at least 1.4 times as big as the Sun, it collapses and explodes in a supernova.

Type II supernovas occur when a star, much more massive than the Sun, ends its life. When such a star begins burning out, the core of the star quickly collapses releasing amazing energy in the form of neutrinos, a kind of particle smaller than even an atom. Electromagnetic radiation — energy that is electric and magnetic — causes the star to explode in a supernova. Whereas Type I supernovas typically destroy their parent stars, Type II explosions usually leave behind the stellar core.

The classification schema regarding the mechanism for supernova explosions helps to more succinctly answer the question: Is the Sun in danger of becoming a supernova? Neither does our Sun have a companion star orbiting it nor does our Sun have the mass necessary to become a supernova. Furthermore, it will be another billion years until the Sun runs out of fuel and swells into a red giant star before going into a white dwarf form.
How is this passage organized?
A)A single phenomenon is introduced and two overlapping classification schemas are contrasted.
B)An original theory is mentioned before being overturned as a result of new findings.
C)Two complementary mechanisms for describing a single phenomenon are discussed and a conclusion is offered.
D)A new classification schema is described and an example of how it works is provided.
E)Two different classification systems are outlined and a question posed to help reconcile both.

It can be inferred from the passage that
A)Classifying a Type I or Type II event based on the presence or absence of hydrogen is not necessarily incompatible with a classification schema based on the mechanism
by which these two events explode.
B) A dense white dwarf’s gravitational pull on its companion star causes the companion star to collapse and explode as a supernova.
C) Before a star such as the Sun can become a red giant, it must first become a white dwarf.
D) In a Type II supernova, energy and electromagnetic radiation causes a star to collapse and explode.
E) Supernovas are rare events in our universe.

Which of the following best summarizes the author’s answer to the question: Is the Sun in danger of becoming a supernova?
A) The Sun is too large to have a white dwarf as a partner and lacks the physical size required to become a red giant.
B) Even if the Sun were paired with a white dwarf, the Sun does not have the mass necessary to create sufficient electromagnetic radiation.
C) The Sun is not a white dwarf with a companion star orbiting it, nor does it have the size to qualify as a Type II supernova.
D) Without a white dwarf orbiting the Sun, the Sun has no obvious way to increase its size to become a Type II supernova.
E) The Sun will inevitably become a supernova once it passes from a red giant to white dwarf but not for at least a billion years.

According to the passage, which statement or statements below are true?
I. The energy created from a Type II explosion is greater than the energy created by a Type I explosion.
II. The sun is not a binary star.
III.Both Type I and Type II supernovas result in the complete destruction of the exploding star.
A) I only
B) II only
C) I and III only
D) II and III only
E) I, II, and III

OA after discussion. A pretty tough passage. Enjoy

Re Q2. I was confused between A and E.

Can someone tell me what's wrong with E please? The last sentence states "Furthermore, it will be another billion years until the Sun runs out of fuel and swells into a red giant star before going into a white dwarf form" . Doesn't this mean it's a rare event in our solar system?
Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2015
Posts: 76
Own Kudos [?]: 104 [0]
Given Kudos: 459
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Internet and New Media)
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
Carcass need POE for question 2 ( option D and option B )
and for question 3 need POE of option A.
Thanks for this tricky passage.
Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2017
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 509
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V30
GPA: 3.35
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
carcass wrote:
D A C B are the OA.

D

The new schema is based on the distinction between Type I and Type II supernovas; the original
schema is one based on the absence of hydrogen (Type I) or the presence of hydrogen (Type II). The
example of the Sun is provided as support for how the classification system works. Choice D best
summarizes this structure.

A

this one is maybe the trickiest. we have from the passage Electromagnetic radiation — energy that is electric and
magnetic — causes the star to explode in a supernova.
and not In a Type II supernova, energy and electromagnetic radiation causes a star to collapse
and explode.
. Electromagnetic = energy + magnetic not energy and electromagnetic = radiation

C

Answer choice C describes accurately and completely the author’s view in the final paragraph. The
Sun is not a binary star because it doesn’t have companion star orbiting it, so it can’t qualify as a Type
I supernova. Nor does the Sun have the size necessary to become a Type II supernova (it would have to
be at least 1.4 times its own size).

B

A take away here is this: even though there isn't a main idea question on the passage is worth to ask yourself ALWAYS what is the topic, scope, and purpose of the passage. The topic is supernovas.
The scope is Type I and Type II supernovas. The purpose is to describe a new schema for classifying Type I and Type II supernovas.

Kudos if you liked my post

hello carcass
where is the new classification mentioned.Subsequent analysis of many of these events revealed that this empirical classification schema instead reflected two different mechanisms for the supernova explosion.

it suggests that the old classification reflects 2 different mechanism of supernova explosion.but there is no new classification mentioned.
Intern
Joined: 28 May 2017
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 42 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.87
WE:Web Development (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
carcass wrote:
In choice A, there is no relationship suggested between the size of the Sun and its ability to have a white dwarf. Choices B and D create unwarranted linkages between Type I and Type II supernovas. In choice E, even if the Sun does become a red giant before becoming a white dwarf, it does not mean that it will become a supernova.

Hope is clear

But isn't size and mass are 2 different things?
Sun needs the mass to become supernova as mentioned in last para. You can have a truck full of cotton which won't weigh as much as small mechanical machinery !

Confusing. I didn't chose C only because of this reason.
Manager
Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 248
Own Kudos [?]: 248 [0]
Given Kudos: 338
GMAT 1: 560 Q42 V25
GMAT 2: 570 Q43 V27
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
JAIN09 wrote:
carcass wrote:
D A C B are the OA.

D

The new schema is based on the distinction between Type I and Type II supernovas; the original
schema is one based on the absence of hydrogen (Type I) or the presence of hydrogen (Type II). The
example of the Sun is provided as support for how the classification system works. Choice D best
summarizes this structure.

A

this one is maybe the trickiest. we have from the passage Electromagnetic radiation — energy that is electric and
magnetic — causes the star to explode in a supernova.
and not In a Type II supernova, energy and electromagnetic radiation causes a star to collapse
and explode.
. Electromagnetic = energy + magnetic not energy and electromagnetic = radiation

C

Answer choice C describes accurately and completely the author’s view in the final paragraph. The
Sun is not a binary star because it doesn’t have companion star orbiting it, so it can’t qualify as a Type
I supernova. Nor does the Sun have the size necessary to become a Type II supernova (it would have to
be at least 1.4 times its own size).

B

A take away here is this: even though there isn't a main idea question on the passage is worth to ask yourself ALWAYS what is the topic, scope, and purpose of the passage. The topic is supernovas.
The scope is Type I and Type II supernovas. The purpose is to describe a new schema for classifying Type I and Type II supernovas.

Kudos if you liked my post

hello carcass
where is the new classification mentioned.Subsequent analysis of many of these events revealed that this empirical classification schema instead reflected two different mechanisms for the supernova explosion.

it suggests that the old classification reflects 2 different mechanism of supernova explosion.but there is no new classification mentioned.

Please read the first line of the last passage: The classification schema regarding the mechanism for supernova explosions helps to more succinctly answer the question: Is the Sun in danger of becoming a supernova?
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17525
Own Kudos [?]: 869 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Supernovas are among the most energetic events in the universe and res [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6991 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14065 posts