Gmatislife123
Please can someone do a full breakdown of each choice and why it is wrong?
This question serves up two unusually juicy decision points:
First, you have a choice between "include" and "includes." If we strip out some of the modifiers, the main clause becomes:
Quote:
The 32 species
are closely related to whales and in fact include/includes...
As others have noted, the subject "the 32 species" is plural, so we need the verb "include." Any answer choice with "includes" is out -- that kills (D) and (E).
Next, you have a choice between "which" and "growing." "Which" must describe a noun or noun phrase.
And anytime you have the construction "CLAUSE + COMMA + -ING," the -ING modifier will describe the entire previous clause.
Take another look at (A):
Quote:
The 32 species that make up the dolphin family are closely related to whales and in fact include the animal known as the killer whale,
which can grow to be 30 feet long and is famous for its aggressive hunting pods.
Here, "which" seems to modify to the "killer whale." That makes sense: the whale can grow to 30 feet long. Keep (A).
In (B) we have:
Quote:
The 32 species that make up the dolphin family are closely related to whales and in fact include the animal known as the killer whale,
growing as big as 30 feet long.
Because "growing" must modify the entire previous clause, it sounds as though: 1) the 32 species that make up the dolphin family -- rather than the killer whale -- are growing up to 30 feet long, and 2) this growth is somehow a consequence of being related to whales. This is nonsense. Families of dolphins don't grow to 30 feet long, and even if they did, it wouldn't be because they're related to whales.
Because the use of "growing" is incoherent here, we can eliminate (B). (C) has the exact same problem, so that's out too.
We're left with (A), which is our winner.
I hope that helps!