dqtuan9627
Please help me with this question
The average hourly wage of shoe factory workers in Manoda are far lower than in the neighboring Barathia. Since Barathia dropped all tariffs on Manodan shoes 2 years ago, the number of shoes sold annually in Barathia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a drop in the number of shoe factory workers in Barathia. Therefore, the latest trade report will probably indicate that the number of shoes Barathia imports annually from Manoda has increased.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A)The number of shoe factory workers in Manoda has increased by at least as much as the number of shoe factory workers in Barathia has decreased.
(B)Shoes manufactured in Manoda have features that shoes manufactured in Manoda do not have.
(C)The average number of hours it takes a Barathian shoe factory worker to manufacture a shoe has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
(D)The number of shoes manufactured annually in Manoda has increased significantly during the past three years.
(E)The difference between the hourly wage of shoe factory workers in Manoda and the hourly wage of shoe factory workers in Barathia is likely to decrease in the next few years.
Premise: recent statistics show a drop in the number of shoe factory workers in Barathia
Conclusion: Therefore, the latest trade report will probably indicate that the number of shoes Barathia imports annually from Manoda has increased.
Assumption: with decrease in the number of shoe factory workers in B, the number of shoe produced in B will decrease.
or in other words the remaining shoe factory workers in B will not produced more shoes to compensate the decreased number of shoes that resulted from drop in number of shoe workers in B.
(A)The number of shoe factory workers in Manoda has increased by at least as much as the number of shoe factory workers in Barathia has decreased.
not necessarily, because it is possible that the number of shoes produced in M is large enough to export without the need to increase the number of workers to produce more(B)Shoes manufactured in Manoda have features that shoes manufactured in Manoda do not have.
feature is out of scope(C)The average number of hours it takes a Barathian shoe factory worker to manufacture a shoe has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
if the average number of hours it takes a B shoe factory worker to manufacture a shoe has decreased significantly, it means that fewer number of workers can produce sig. more shoes, so there is no need to import shoes from M. this negation breaks the conclusion so it is the assumption(D)The number of shoes manufactured annually in Manoda has increased significantly during the past three years.
has no effect on the argument(E)The difference between the hourly wage of shoe factory workers in Manoda and the hourly wage of shoe factory workers in Barathia is likely to decrease in the next few years.
out of scope