PaterD
GMATNinja Could you please provide son insight to the 6th question, I'm confused because in the 1st paragraph:
Quote:
The impatience and artistic restlessness that characterized his work spawned one stylistic turn after another and made Davis anathema to many critics...
Then again in the last one
Quote:
But because his career endured, because he didn’t die young or record only sporadically, and because he refused to dwell in whatever niche he had previously carved out , critics find it difficult to definitively rank Davis in the aesthetic hierarchy to which they cling.
Both phrases makes me eliminate answer B almost immediately, yet is the correct answer.
My answer was D, because of first quoted statement. I would much appreciate your perspective regarding this question.
Best Regards!
I am not
GMATNinja by any shot, but let me try to explain this.
Take this as a CR question.
....because his career endured, because he didn’t die young or record only sporadically, and because he refused to dwell in whatever niche he had previously carved out , critics find it difficult to definitively rank Davis in the aesthetic hierarchy to which they cling.Conclusion : Jazz Critics didn't put the respect to MD because he often changed the style of jaaz.
Premises : as explained by examples to his radical change of style and always changing the way jaaz was played.
Now, we have to weaken the argument (conclusion reached by author here), so we have to attack his premise.
Pre-think : What if critics liked some other jaaz player who did the same thing as MD. SO that attacks author's reasoning behind the conclusion.
The quoted excerpts, that you have provided, states the premises the author is using to form his argument. So, we attack that.
Now, let's go through the options :
(A) Many jazz musicians who specialize in improvisational playing are greatly admired by jazz critics. -
live improvisational play was appreciated by critics, is very specific and doesn't attack the premise as a whole - as MD did improvisation and many other innovations in the way jaaz is played. Eliminate.(B) Many jazz musicians whose careers have been characterized by several radical changes in style are greatly admired by jazz critics. -
critics appreciating some other jaaz artist who had a similar career to MD - attacks the premise set by the author. Looks correct. Keep this for now. Let's check the next option.(C) Several jazz musicians who perform exclusively on electronic instruments are very highly regarded by jazz critics. -
electronic inst - trap - doesn't attack the whole premise used by author - A little better than A, but still too narrow. Eliminate.(D) The jazz innovators who are held in the highest regard by jazz critics had brief yet brilliant careers. -
Innovators - what innovations - does that relate to change in jaaz style of music? Eliminate.(E) Jazz critics are known to have a higher regard for musicality than for mere technical virtuosity. -
Not relevant. Eliminate.
So, we have option B, left as the answer.
You have read the correct passage, but it seems you had difficulty in understanding the question.
Hope this helped.