It is currently 17 Dec 2017, 00:04

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 399 [0], given: 0

The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2008, 21:00
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (00:41) correct 32% (00:42) wrong based on 564 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation projects the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that even environmentalists are beginning to raise alarms.

(A) the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that

(B) at a cost raising water bills so high that

(C) at a cost which raises water bills high enough so

(D) whose cost will raise water bills so high that

(E) whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

[Reveal] Spoiler: Query
I am not clear as to why "whose" can be used as a pronoun for projects.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 399 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2469

Kudos [?]: 868 [0], given: 19

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2008, 21:30
x97agarwal wrote:
The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation projects the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that even environmentalists are beginning to raise alarms.

A. the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
B. at a cost raising water bills so high that
C. at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
D. whose cost will raise water bills so high that
E. whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

D is the OA, I got it correct via POE but still I am not clear as to why "whose" can be used as a pronoun for projects.


D. without "whose", the senence becomes run-on.

"also so high that" is correct form of idiom.
_________________

Verbal: http://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: http://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html


GT

Kudos [?]: 868 [0], given: 19

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 428

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 1

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2008, 21:40
x97agarwal wrote:
The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation projects the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that even environmentalists are beginning to raise alarms.
A. the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
B. at a cost raising water bills so high that
C. at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
D. whose cost will raise water bills so high that
E. whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

D is the OA, I got it correct via POE but still I am not clear as to why "whose" can be used as a pronoun for projects.


I would go with D) as well. Can you think of any other pronoun other than "whose" ?

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 1

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 351

Kudos [?]: 69 [1], given: 0

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2008, 23:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
As “projects” are not human, we cannot use whose. So D, E are out.

D. whose cost will raise water bills so high that
= OUT

E. whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that
= OUT

A. the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
= OUT – “high enough so that” is wrong, the correct idiom is “high enough to/that”

C. at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
= OUT – “high enough so” is wrong. The correct idiom is “high enough to/that” or “ so high that”. Also, “raises water bills high enough” is restrictive clause, so we should use “that” instead of “which”.

B. at a cost raising water bills so high that
= CORRECT

Kudos [?]: 69 [1], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2008, 09:10
x97agarwal wrote:
The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation projects the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that even environmentalists are beginning to raise alarms.
A. the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
B. at a cost raising water bills so high that
C. at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
D. whose cost will raise water bills so high that
E. whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

D is the OA, I got it correct via POE but still I am not clear as to why "whose" can be used as a pronoun for projects.


There more than one water treatment and conservation projects here.
"whose" is used to refer to costs of all those projects.

here "number of water treatment and conservation" is an object . and we want to start another statement with cost as the subject so it needs a relative pronoun (in this case whose)to refer to those projects.

Got it..?

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1790

Kudos [?]: 1106 [1], given: 5

Location: New York
Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2008, 10:45
1
This post received
KUDOS
judokan wrote:
As “projects” are not human, we cannot use whose. So D, E are out.

D. whose cost will raise water bills so high that
= OUT

E. whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that
= OUT

A. the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
= OUT – “high enough so that” is wrong, the correct idiom is “high enough to/that”

C. at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
= OUT – “high enough so” is wrong. The correct idiom is “high enough to/that” or “ so high that”. Also, “raises water bills high enough” is restrictive clause, so we should use “that” instead of “which”.

B. at a cost raising water bills so high that
= CORRECT


B is not correct.
city proposed projects.. at cost of raising water bills..
--> menas.. they propsing projects to raise the water bills..
distorts the original meaning.
_________________

Your attitude determines your altitude
Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1106 [1], given: 5

3 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4321

Kudos [?]: 8356 [3], given: 366

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2011, 18:51
3
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Grammar Point: Only ‘Who’ can be used for humans. ‘Who’ cannot be used anyone or any people other than humans. However, ‘whose’ can be used for humans as well as for other lower animates such as cattle, birds, or so on. ‘Whose’ can also be used for inanimate ones like tables and projects. This is because there is no other word than ‘whose’ that can replace it, while still carrying the possessive meaning. Can you think of any such word?

Some body said costs is the real subject. Nay; it is the projects which is actually the object of the main cluse that becomes the subject of the subordinate clause and gets represented by a relative possessive pronoun ‘whose’, in order to avoid the repetition of saying “projects’”.
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Kudos [?]: 8356 [3], given: 366

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Back to (GMAT) Times Square!!!
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Posts: 178

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 25

Location: United States (IL)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2011, 02:47
daagh wrote:
Grammar Point: Only ‘Who’ can be used for humans. ‘Who’ cannot be used anyone or any people other than humans. However, ‘whose’ can be used for humans as well as for other lower animates such as cattle, birds, or so on. ‘Whose’ can also be used for inanimate ones like tables and projects. This is because there is no other word than ‘whose’ that can replace it, while still carrying the possessive meaning. Can you think of any such word?

Some body said costs is the real subject. Nay; it is the projects which is actually the object of the main cluse that becomes the subject of the subordinate clause and gets represented by a relative possessive pronoun ‘whose’, in order to avoid the repetition of saying “projects’”.


Thanks for the explanation as I also thought that B is correct!
V
_________________

Working towards a goal...
V.

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 25

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2011
Posts: 59

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 6

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2011, 03:37
Why is it "cost" and not "costs"?

Cost(s) refers to projects and not number, doesn't it?

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 6

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2013
Posts: 446

Kudos [?]: 1862 [1], given: 289

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Apr 2014, 04:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation projects the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that even environmentalists are beginning to raise alarms.

A) the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
B) at a cost raising water bills so high that
C) at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
D) whose cost will raise water bills so high that
E) whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

Hi, Can anyone explain why the correct answer is the right answer choice, please.

Last edited by broall on 05 Jul 2017, 19:52, edited 1 time in total.
Merged post. Please search before posting

Kudos [?]: 1862 [1], given: 289

1 KUDOS received
Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3425

Kudos [?]: 9539 [1], given: 1203

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Apr 2014, 09:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
Simply because is the right answer :-D :-D :twisted: :roll:

Jokes aside, Sir you are a good student :) glad to help you.

Well even though this is not a super tough question, you can learn a lot from this one: how to attack a question (easy or difficult), how to disentagle a possible pitfall, and so forth

Remember : the best strategy is as soos as you read along the way the entire question (is important to read the WHOLE question as it is) to spot the error already from the forst underlined words. So let go and analize the single answer choices:

A) the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that

the cost of which raises.........even though you do not see an error , is easy to figure out thet is awkward and sound weird. moreover, which you know that 99% of the time is used to refer to its antecedent in the form: X,which......favourite gmat construction

B) at a cost raising water bills so high that

make a lonmg story short: similar to the previous one

C) at a cost which raises water bills high enough so

ditto

E) whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

whose cost (the cost itself) raise water bills ?? a cost raise the bill ?? well this is fine until now: the cost of both things mentioned earlier in the first part of the sentence. good.

high enough : is weird, wordy really bad as construction....this is main issue with E. It seems that that refers to enough,and this to the bills and this is nonsensical, eventually

D) whose cost will raise water bills so high that

first part as in E but the second part is fine: there is that and that is used for restrictive clause

Quote:
What Is a Restrictive Clause?
A restrictive clause is a clause which functions as an adjective to identify the word it modifies. A restrictive clause is essential for the intended meaning. A restrictive clause is not offset with commas


In E you have high enough so that: wrong

In D you have so high that: right

Do not esitate to ask if something is unclear
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Kudos [?]: 9539 [1], given: 1203

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2013
Posts: 44

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 9

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2014, 03:56
x97agarwal wrote:
The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation projects the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that even environmentalists are beginning to raise alarms.
A. the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
B. at a cost raising water bills so high that
C. at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
D. whose cost will raise water bills so high that
E. whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

[Reveal] Spoiler: Query
I am not clear as to why "whose" can be used as a pronoun for projects.



Hello Experts,

I can figure out that D is the answer as it uses the correct Idiom. But I am still not convinced on POE. Can you please help me figure out mistakes in other choices.


Thanks Anuj
_________________

Preparing for the next shot!!!

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 9

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2013
Posts: 446

Kudos [?]: 1862 [1], given: 289

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2014, 08:44
1
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation projects the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that even environmentalists are beginning to raise alarms.

A) the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
B) at a cost raising water bills so high that
C) at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
D) whose cost will raise water bills so high that
E) whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

Hi, can anyone explain what is wrong with B & C, please.

Last edited by broall on 05 Jul 2017, 19:52, edited 1 time in total.
Merged post. Please search before posting

Kudos [?]: 1862 [1], given: 289

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 831

Kudos [?]: 294 [0], given: 61

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2014, 09:02
the answer is D: whose cost will raise water bills so high that

Quote:
Hi, can anyone explain what is wrong with B & C, please.


faults in bold:

B says: at a cost raising water bills so high that

C says: at a cost which raises water bills high enough so

Kudos [?]: 294 [0], given: 61

2 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 3610 [2], given: 123

Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2014, 13:04
2
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
goodyear2013 wrote:
The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation projects the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that even environmentalists are beginning to raise alarms.

A) the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
B) at a cost raising water bills so high that
C) at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
D) whose cost will raise water bills so high that
E) whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

Hi, can anyone explain what is wrong with B & C, please.


Hello goodyear2013.

Good question. B and C are tempting but they are incorrect because they simply change the intended meaning.

Structure of B/C is: The city has proposed X at cost. B and C convey the idea that the city has paid for some services, i.e., marketing, advertising, printing flyer,... TO PROPOSE its projects. The cost here is the cost of the city's action - proposing, not the true cost of the projects.

For example: Your bicycle is broken. Mike will help you fix your bicycle at cost. There is no free service.
It means you pay for Mike's service, not for your bicycle.

The idea is the same in this question. Both D and E use "whose" to modify "projects", but D wins because it uses a correct idiom "so X that Y'.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3610 [2], given: 123

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 May 2013
Posts: 80

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 12

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Sep 2014, 09:11
goodyear2013 wrote:
The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation projects the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that even environmentalists are beginning to raise alarms.

A) the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
B) at a cost raising water bills so high that
C) at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
D) whose cost will raise water bills so high that
E) whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

Hi, can anyone explain what is wrong with B & C, please.


Hey goodyear2013,
You can even eliminate C on the basis of Subject-Verb error
" A number of water treatment and conservation projects " - Plural
" raises" - singular, should be "raise"- Plural

:)

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 12

Director
Director
User avatar
S
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 747

Kudos [?]: 332 [0], given: 14

Location: Bangalore, India
Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2014, 05:34
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
adymehta29 wrote:
Hey goodyear2013,
You can even eliminate C on the basis of Subject-Verb error
" A number of water treatment and conservation projects " - Plural
" raises" - singular, should be "raise"- Plural:)

Actually in C, which is modifying costs.

Apart from other errors, a reason to quickly eliminate C is that it does not use a comma before which. When which is used as a classical relative pronoun (as is the case here), there must be a comma before which.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses a framework to determine what which modifies, its application and examples in significant detail. If you can PM you email-id, I can send you the corresponding section.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish (GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle)
http://www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Kudos [?]: 332 [0], given: 14

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2013
Posts: 65

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 243

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2015, 06:09
x2suresh wrote:
judokan wrote:
As “projects” are not human, we cannot use whose. So D, E are out.

D. whose cost will raise water bills so high that
= OUT

E. whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that
= OUT

A. the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
= OUT – “high enough so that” is wrong, the correct idiom is “high enough to/that”

C. at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
= OUT – “high enough so” is wrong. The correct idiom is “high enough to/that” or “ so high that”. Also, “raises water bills high enough” is restrictive clause, so we should use “that” instead of “which”.

B. at a cost raising water bills so high that
= CORRECT


B is not correct.
city proposed projects.. at cost of raising water bills..
--> menas.. they propsing projects to raise the water bills..
distorts the original meaning.


I don't think that is the reason for option B. The sentence doesn't use infinitive (intentional), in which case your understanding would be right. IMO, in B, raising means that the action is happening. Here the +ing has taken present form. Had it been, will raise, the sentence would have been correct. Option D actually does that by using future tense. It's a proposal.

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 243

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2015
Posts: 222

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 79

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Feb 2016, 01:12
Hi Experts/ chetan2u,

Can we eliminate A,C and E on basis of redundancy (Enough +So)...??
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
Prakhar


Last edited by PrakharGMAT on 11 Mar 2016, 01:06, edited 2 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 79

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1387

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 916

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Mar 2016, 00:29
x97agarwal wrote:
The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation projects the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that even environmentalists are beginning to raise alarms.
A. the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that
B. at a cost raising water bills so high that
C. at a cost which raises water bills high enough so
D. whose cost will raise water bills so high that
E. whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

[Reveal] Spoiler: Query
I am not clear as to why "whose" can be used as a pronoun for projects.


at a cost modifies the preceding verb, propose at a cost is not logic
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 916

Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro   [#permalink] 11 Mar 2016, 00:29

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 30 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The city has proposed a number of water treatment and conservation pro

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.