Anandanwar
Hello,
I have a few queries.
Q1:
Passage says: Companies can be more innovative and flexible in their planning cycles if they have the option to hire employees on an as-needed basis.
Hiring employees on need basis is by definition in interim employees. The benefit is what comes because of "option to hire employees on an as-needed basis".
So the benefit should be "Companies can be more innovative and flexible in their planning cycles"
With this logic D seemed correct to me.
Q3:
The purpose of the passage is to explain why interim staffing has become popular.
Choice E would show more reason for interim staffing.
Choice B would just show more interim staffing is being adopted.
By this since E does more towards the purpose of the passage, it seemed E is better.
Could you please explain the fault in my reasoning?
Thanks and Regards.
Ankit
Anandanwar Great questions! Your analytical thinking is solid, but there are some subtle distinctions in RC interpretation that are causing the confusion. Let me address each query:
Question 1: Main Benefit to Employers
Your reasoning has a logical flow, but you're making the scope of "flexibility" too narrow. Let's look at the passage structure:
Key Evidence:Quote:
"Employers are pushing the drive toward interim staffing
in order to maintain maximum flexibility."
The phrase "in order to" signals the
primary purpose/main benefit. The passage then elaborates on what this flexibility means:
- "Companies can be more innovative and flexible in their planning cycles if they have the option to hire employees on an as-needed basis"
Notice the conditional structure: The flexibility in planning cycles is a
result of having hiring flexibility, not the main benefit itself. The
main benefit is the flexibility to hire as needed (Choice C), which then
enables flexible planning cycles.
Additionally, the passage mentions cost savings with "Additionally, employers save money..." The word "Additionally" indicates this is a
secondary benefit, not the main one.
Why D is incorrect: "Flexibility in scheduling" refers to work schedules (when employees work), which the passage attributes as a benefit to
employees, not employers.
Question 3: Author's Purpose
Your understanding of the purpose needs refinement:
Author's Purpose: To
describe and explain a labor market trend (the shift toward interim staffing).
The passage is
informational/descriptive, not
argumentative. The author isn't trying to convince us that interim staffing is good; they're explaining that it's happening and why.
Choice B vs. E:- Choice B (statistics on increased emphasis): Would provide concrete evidence that the trend exists - directly supporting the main claim
- Choice E (statistics on cost savings): Would only elaborate on one specific benefit already mentioned
Think of it this way: If you're writing about a trend, what's more important - proving the trend exists (B) or adding details about one aspect already covered (E)?
Key RC Strategy: Always distinguish between:
- Primary vs. Secondary points (Q1 issue)
- Describing vs. Advocating (Q3 issue)
When passages use structure words like "in order to" or "Additionally," pay attention - they're signaling the hierarchy of information!
Hope this clarifies the reasoning! Let me know if you need further explanation on either point.