Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 21:46 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 21:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vivek_dj
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Last visit: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 337
Own Kudos:
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Posts: 337
Kudos: 57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,708
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,708
Kudos: 1,578
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Dharmin
Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Last visit: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 209
Own Kudos:
Location: India
Posts: 209
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vivek_dj
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Last visit: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 337
Own Kudos:
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Posts: 337
Kudos: 57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer is (D).
The original sentence (A) suffers from faulty parallelism. The second occurrence of "from" should be deleted to restore the proper parallelism between the phrases "the host" and "the diplomat's." At the same time, the word "both" is redundant in light of the words "the other" at the end of the sentence, thereby confusing the meaning of the sentence.

(B) remedies the original sentence's problems but presents a usage problem. The phrase "each other" should refer to only two persons or things. Because the potential number of "citizens" (guests) might exceed two, "one another" should be used instead.

(C) suggests a nonsensical meaning - that the country itself (rather than a person) seats its citizens. The construction also creates ambiguity as to what the rules require.

(D) remedies the original sentence's faulty parallelism by reconstructing the phrase, using the subjunctive form ("thatтАа be").

(E) is faulty in two respects. It includes the word "to" twice; the second occurrence is redundant and should be omitted. Also, the use of double possessive adjectives ("diplomat's" and "country's") is improper.

Vivek.
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,708
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,708
Kudos: 1,578
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Oh well, thx vivek for posting answer with explanation. Was about to provide an explanation to Dharmin but you just nailed it :wink:



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
Current Student
278 posts