Sentence Analysis

While the spraying can be carefully planned, three things – accidents, unforeseeable weather conditions, and pilot errors – cause much larger deposits of spray than predicted.
There is one error in the sentence: there is no antecedent for the pronoun “they”. The antecedent of “they” has to be the doer of “anticipating”. There is no such doer in the sentence.
Option Analysis
A.
weather conditions that could not be foreseen, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than they had Incorrect. For the reason mentioned above.
B.
weather conditions that cannot be foreseen, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than
Correct. The comparison becomes correct by doing away with “they had”. The comparison currently is: X, Y, and Z cause much larger deposits of spray than anticipated. While some people may find the past participle “anticipated” after “than” incorrect, this is a perfectly valid construction. Other examples of this construction:
1. unforeseeable weather conditions, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than they had
2. Philippine National Bank’s ’00 Loss was much wider than predicted (Source: WSJ.com)
If you search the following phrase (including quotes) in Google, you’ll get more than 4000 results.
“than anticipated” site:wsj.com
C.
unforeseeable weather conditions, and pilot errors are the cause of much larger deposits of spray than they had Incorrect. For the following reasons:
1. Same error as the original has.
2. The contrast doesn’t make sense. With this option, the two ideas separated by “but” are:
1. Spraying can be carefully planned
2. X, Y, and Z are the cause of much larger deposits of spray than anticipated
The contrast is between “spraying can be carefully planned” and what are the causes of larger deposits of spray. Logically, the contrast has to be between “spraying can be carefully planned” and “something leads to much larger deposits of spray”. For example:
Logical (Parallel to the intended contrast in this sentence): He can score high, but his careless attitude causes him to score low.
Not logical(Parallel to this option): He can score high, but his careless attitude is the cause of his low score.
D.
weather conditions that are not foreseeable, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than Incorrect. The only difference between this option and option B is in the “that” clause. The reason this option is incorrect is that in Standard English, we don’t write “that are not foreseeable”; we use “that cannot be foreseen”.
E.
unforeseeable weather conditions, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than they hadIncorrect. Has the same error as option A has.
_________________
Get taught live by 99th percentile instructors, Chiranjeev and Anish.
To know about our upcoming online classroom batches:
https://gmatintensive.com/