GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 14 Oct 2019, 11:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The arctic curlew, a once common wading species in the tundra, has

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1493
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User
The arctic curlew, a once common wading species in the tundra, has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 06 Oct 2019, 23:08
1
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 216 sessions

61% (03:01) correct 39% (02:45) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 212 sessions

36% (01:06) correct 64% (01:08) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 212 sessions

39% (01:18) correct 61% (00:57) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

The arctic curlew, a once common wading species in the tundra, has reached endangered status in a mere few decades. Those who account for the sudden loss of the bird do so in terms of either pollution or climate change. Fagen notes how hydrocarbons from oil tankers have increased in a proportion commensurate with the decline in the number of arctic curlew. He believes that the birds not only ingest hydrocarbons while wading in polluted water but that they also feed on worms and small fish that themselves have accrued modest amounts of hydrocarbons. Miller, on the other hand, believes that climate change alone can account for the depletion of the arctic curlew. She argues that since many of the areas in which it once fed no longer provide adequate sustenance, the bird has been forced to change migratory paths and must land in a foreign ecosystem where it is unable find adequate nutrition.

Both theories, however, are somewhat correct but not in a way that either Fagen or Miller would have likely anticipated. The theory positing that the hydrocarbons birds ingest affect their ability to navigate contains elements relating to both climate change and pollution. For example, when a curlew ingests tainted fish, its ability to navigate for several hours afterwards is diminished and it will often veer from its traditional path. Where at one point such deviations would not have affected the bird’s ability to forage, climate change has resulted in a significant diminishment of areas capable of providing sufficient sustenance for the arctic curlew. As a result, it often succumbs to starvation.

1 The theory offered in the second paragraph differs most from Miller’s theory in regards to the

A type of sustenance that the curlew attempts to find
B reason the arctic curlew veers from its traditional flight path
C influence of oil tankers on the curlew’s ability to make navigational decisions
D the amount of area available to a migrating curlew
E extent to which its navigational course is affected by its environment


2 According to the passage, an arctic curlew suffering navigational issues is most consistent with which of the following?

A Fagen’s theory
B Miller’s theory
C A theory with which the passage disagrees
D A decrease in hydrocarbons
E A decrease in areas providing adequate nutrition


3. Which of the following is the primary purpose of the passage?

A To describe how elements of two theories are consistent with a third theory
B To highlight shortcomings in two theories and to support a third theory
C To contrast two theories and show how together both are sufficient
D To discuss how a third theory is similar to two competing theories
E To introduce three theories and describe notable flaws in each


Originally posted by chesstitans on 12 Jan 2018, 11:08.
Last edited by SajjadAhmad on 06 Oct 2019, 23:08, edited 3 times in total.
Updated - Complete topic (814).
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 26 Apr 2017
Posts: 45
Re: The arctic curlew, a once common wading species in the tundra, has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2018, 20:51
Dear experts,

Please explain question 3. Thanks.
I have chosen answer C: Because the first paragraph compare 2 theories and the second paragraph, it states "Both theories, however, are somewhat correct but not in a way that either Fagen or Miller would have likely anticipated" - I have concluded that it needs both theories to be correct.

Please explain ans: A

Thanks
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 329
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Reviews Badge
Re: The arctic curlew, a once common wading species in the tundra, has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2018, 06:56
Valhalla wrote:
Dear experts,

Please explain question 3. Thanks.
I have chosen answer C: Because the first paragraph compare 2 theories and the second paragraph, it states "Both theories, however, are somewhat correct but not in a way that either Fagen or Miller would have likely anticipated" - I have concluded that it needs both theories to be correct.

Please explain ans: A

Thanks



C states that together they are sufficient to explain a phenomenon. The passage doesn't state.
Only few elements are correct from both the theories.
Points from first theory that is consistent with the third one - hydrocarbons impairing navigational skills.
Points from second theory that is consistent with the third one - when they divert from their usual path , non availability of food due to climate change.

These are the only points that are in agreement with the third one.
Hence A is right.
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2401
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The arctic curlew, a once common wading species in the tundra, has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2018, 06:53
3
1
All correct in 6 mins 40 seconds, including 3 mins to read.

1 The theory offered in the second paragraph differs most from Miller’s theory in regards to the

A type of sustenance that the curlew attempts to find
B reason the arctic curlew veers from its traditional flight path
C influence of oil tankers on the curlew’s ability to make navigational decisions
D the amount of area available to a migrating curlew
E extent to which its navigational course is affected by its environment

Miller --> since many of the areas in which it once fed no longer provide adequate sustenance, the bird has been forced to change migratory paths and must land in a foreign ecosystem where it is unable find adequate nutrition.

Theory offered in 2nd paragraph -
when a curlew ingests tainted fish, its ability to navigate for several hours afterwards is diminished and it will often veer from its traditional path. Where at one point such deviations would not have affected the bird’s ability to forage, climate change has resulted in a significant diminishment of areas capable of providing sufficient sustenance for the arctic curlew.

Answer B

2 According to the passage, an arctic curlew suffering navigational issues is most consistent with which of the following?

A Fagen’s theory
B Miller’s theory
C A theory with which the passage disagrees
D A decrease in hydrocarbons
E A decrease in areas providing adequate nutrition

Both theories, however, are somewhat correct but not in a way that either Fagen or Miller would have likely anticipated. The loss of navigational ability can be attributed to factor described in Fagen's theory(ingestion of hydrocarbon hampers navigation)

3. Which of the following is the primary purpose of the passage?

A To describe how elements of two theories are consistent with a third theory - Correct
B To highlight shortcomings in two theories and to support a third theory -- shortcomings are not highlighted
C To contrast two theories and show how together both are sufficient -- even together the two theories are not sufficient in the original way
D To discuss how a third theory is similar to two competing theories -- Incorrect
E To introduce three theories and describe notable flaws in each -- no flaw in third was stated

Both theories, however, are somewhat correct but not in a way that either Fagen or Miller would have likely anticipated. The first line of second paragraph states the essence.
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Posts: 33
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V24
GPA: 3.5
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The arctic curlew, a once common wading species in the tundra, has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Mar 2018, 08:27
2 According to the passage, an arctic curlew suffering navigational issues is most consistent with which of the following?

A Fagen’s theory- Fagen's theory is related to navigation and explains why curlew suffers navigational issue. Miller's theory explains loss of areas capable of providing sufficient sustenance- correct.
B Miller’s theory- consistent with the "significant diminishment of areas capable of providing sufficient sustenance for the arctic curlew", not with the navigational issue.
C A theory with which the passage disagrees
D A decrease in hydrocarbons
E A decrease in areas providing adequate nutrition

3. Which of the following is the primary purpose of the passage?

A To describe how elements of two theories are consistent with a third theory- Correct
B To highlight shortcomings in two theories and to support a third theory
C To contrast two theories and show how together both are sufficient
D To discuss how a third theory is similar to two competing theories- out
E To introduce three theories and describe notable flaws in each- out
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Posts: 143
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The arctic curlew, a once common wading species in the tundra, has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2018, 10:19
Passage summary:
1) Introduces a problem: the population of the arctic curlew has contracted. There are two theories to explain this:
a) Fagen explains the observation in terms of polluting factors;
b) Miller does the same in terms of a broader explanation - climate change

2) The author claims that both theories are correct in some way because his or her theory shows that the two are interrelated to explain the cause underlying the decrease in the arctic curlew.


1 The theory offered in the second paragraph differs most from Miller’s theory in regards to the
Relevant text: She argues that since many of the areas in which it once fed no longer provide adequate sustenance, the bird has been forced to change migratory paths <...> For example, when a curlew ingests tainted fish, its ability to navigate for several hours afterwards is diminished and it will often veer from its traditional path.
A type of sustenance that the curlew attempts to find agrees with Miller's
B reason the arctic curlew veers from its traditional flight path correct
C influence of oil tankers on the curlew’s ability to make navigational decisions regards Fagen's theory, not Miller's
D the amount of area available to a migrating curlew
E extent to which its navigational course is affected by its environment agrees with Miller's

2 According to the passage, an arctic curlew suffering navigational issues is most consistent with which of the following?
A Fagen’s theory correct, because he provides a reasons to explain why the bird veers from tradition path, and the author agrees with that
B Miller’s theory actually the third theory disagrees with Miller's on the part that what causes the deviation in the birds' migratory routs
C A theory with which the passage disagrees
D A decrease in hydrocarbons supprts Fagen's
E A decrease in areas providing adequate nutrition supports Miller's

3. Which of the following is the primary purpose of the passage?
A To describe how elements of two theories are consistent with a third theory correct
B To highlight shortcomings in two theories and to support a third theory
C To contrast two theories and show how together both are sufficient
D To discuss how a third theory is similar to two competing theories
E To introduce three theories and describe notable flaws in each
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 159
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
Re: The arctic curlew, a once common wading species in the tundra, has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2019, 02:21
Hi everyone,
Took 6:25 minutes and got 2/3 correct. Took me 2:50 minutes to read, write down paragraphs summaries and main point.

P1:contrast F and M's theories
P2: reconcile F and M's theories considering some elements right and some others not

MP: Discuss reasons for the decrease of the curlew through F and M's theories

[color=#00ff00]-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[/color]
1 The theory offered in the second paragraph differs most from Miller’s theory in regards to the

Pre-thinking:
Miller think that the different path is taken only because of the climate change but actually it is because the hidrocarbons

A type of sustenance that the curlew attempts to find
Not in line with pre-thinking. Hence incorrect

B reason the arctic curlew veers from its traditional flight path
in line with pre-thinking. Hence correct

C influence of oil tankers on the curlew’s ability to make navigational decisions
Not in line with pre-thinking. It's not about oil tankers but it is about hidrocarbons. Hence incorrect

D the amount of area available to a migrating curlew
Not in line with pre-thinking. hence incorrect

E extent to which its navigational course is affected by its environment
Not in line with pre-thinking. hence incorrect

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2 According to the passage, an arctic curlew suffering navigational issues is most consistent with which of the following?

Pre-thinking:
The reason are the hydrocarbons discussed in Fagen's theory


A Fagen’s theory
In line with pre-thinking. Hence correct

B Miller’s theory
Not in line with pre- thinking. Hence incorrect


C A theory with which the passage disagrees
Not in line with pre- thinking. The passage does not disagree here. Hence incorrect

D A decrease in hydrocarbons
A decrease in Hydrocarbons is not discussed in the passage. Hence incorrect

E A decrease in areas providing adequate nutrition
As per the passage the bird takes a different path because it eats Hydrocarbons. Hence incorrect

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


3. Which of the following is the primary purpose of the passage?

Pre-thinking:
Refer to main point formulation above to analyze the answer choices

A To describe how elements of two theories are consistent with a third theory
This is correct because the passage states that only elements of both theories are correct.

B To highlight shortcomings in two theories and to support a third theory
No shortcomings are outlined. Hence incorrect

C To contrast two theories and show how together both are sufficient
Both are not sufficient. Only elements pertaining to both are correct. Hence incorrect

D To discuss how a third theory is similar to two competing theories
The third theory is not similar. It is different but with elements in common. Hence incorrect

E To introduce three theories and describe notable flaws in each
Not according to the passage. Hence incorrect

It is a good day to be alive, cheers!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The arctic curlew, a once common wading species in the tundra, has   [#permalink] 18 Aug 2019, 02:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The arctic curlew, a once common wading species in the tundra, has

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne