nightblade354
arvind910619, the difference between 'or' and 'and' is as follows:
-- In baseball, you will be suspended for taking drugs X, Y, or Z -- This means if you take ANY of them, you are suspended.
-- In baseball, you will be suspended for taking drugs X, Y, and Z-- This means you have to take ALL of them to be suspended.
Kevinjoshi,
The three items are parallel because the use of any of them discounts the ability to be labeled 'organic'.
A. genetic engineering or ionizing radiation, and with sewage sludge, --
This is saying we can use genetic engineering or radiation and as long as we don't use sewage sludge, then it is organic. I don't think that is what the question is saying. B. genetic engineering or ionizing radiation, or the use of sewage sludge, --
'using the use of' makes this sentence incorrectC. genetic engineering or ionizing radiation, as well as the use of sewage sludge, --
same as BD. genetic engineering, ionizing radiation, and sewage sludge --
See my explanation to Arvind aboveE. genetic engineering, ionizing radiation, or sewage sludge --
Winner Does this help?
nightblade354Thanks for your detailed explanation. But, I still have a doubt. In the given sentence three items are parallel so if we break the whole sentence into three parts it must make sense.
i.e.
1. The USDA strictly prohibits vegetables that are grown using genetic engineering from being labeled “organic.”
2. The USDA strictly prohibits vegetables that are grown using sewage sludge from being labeled “organic.”
3. The USDA strictly prohibits vegetables that are grown
using ionizing radiation from being labeled “organic.”
In the above sentences 1st & 2nd make sense, but the red colored part in the 3rd sentence seems odd to me.
Is my understanding correct or I am missing some basics here??
However, I do agree that out of D & E, E is logical and perhaps the correct answer.