SHRAVAN1999
The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records . Write Issue Essay
I agree with the author that video camera provides an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it became more important form of documentation than written records. In today's world, Organizations are looking for people that have practical knowledge rather than people only having conceptual knowledge that is the knowledge procured from books.
Video camera is a very essential tool in various sectors such as education sectors, wildlife sectors,medical sectors, industrial sectors and so on. Video camera can be used as a documentation tool as the information observed and obtained from live feed helps to explain and understand more deeply. But every device or a man made thing has its advantages and disadvantages. So, it is the responsibility of the person using the camera to good use within certain limitations.
The first example is the use of video camera in education sectors. Nowadays, children/students mostly prefer video lectures as they can understand the concepts more clearly and in detail. Children/students will be able to raise doubts related to the topic by understanding the concepts. Video form of documentation is the type of data collection method that cannot be destroyed and can be re watched / resumed anytime. With video camera teachers can record their teaching and lectures. This can be used as a documentation tool that will be beneficial for the children/students to obtain and understand necessary information. The children/students can replay and again watch the video infinite number of times till they understand their concepts. By opting this method, the information and concepts permanently remain in the children/students mind and will be helpful for the children/students to score good grades in their examinations.
The second example is the use of video camera in the wildlife sector where the person has to document wildlife creatures. In wildlife sector evidence plays a very important role. If the person does not have proper evidence then their observation is considered bogus and will lose its credibility. By having video camera the person can document the rare wildlife species and can be used as the form of an evidence to prove its credibility. This helps the person as well as other people in that sector to understand more about the way of living, their nature, their death more clearly and accurately which benefits the people in the sector to make accurate assumptions regarding the particular species.
Thirdly, the use of Video camera in industrial sectors. In industrial sector a photography method called Chronography method is widely used. In this method the head operator uses a motion camera. An intermittent light is attached to the operators legs or hand that are going to used while performing a task. The operator gives the worker a particular task and the motion camera captures or records the motions involved while performing a particular task. Chronography method is considered as an accurate tool to measure the time required by the worker to complete a particular task. The video is used as a documentation to refer what different motions were involved in performing the task and can be used as a reference for other new workers to understand the manufacturing method of that particular task. Therefore , Video camera is used a documentation form in industrial sector as it is considered as an essential tool for determining the labour cost in a manufacturing industry.
In conclusion, I agree that video camera provides accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that can act as a more credible documentation form as compared to written records.
As a general rule, I think you're better off reaching a more balanced or tempered conclusion than such a one-sided one. You might think that video is more important that written records in some cases, most cases, or overall, but it would be wise to also give one or more examples where written works just fine. For instance, you could probably make the case that literature, history, philosophy, psychology, sociology, and economics are perfectly well-suited for a written approach rather than a video one. Remember that the AWA is there to see how you write, how well you organize and articulate your thoughts, and how well you reason through the prompt. An important element of the reasoning component is whether you account for all inputs/factors. You should feel free to reach a conclusion to either side, but it's always good show that you understand that it's not 100% to one side. Your essay is very one-sided and I would wonder as a reader whether your approach to problem solving leaves blind spots to the counter-arguments or counter-examples.
FWIW, I also don't agree with the claim that science without video is at risk of being deemed bogus. Galileo, Copernicus, Einstein, Newton. None of them used video and I don't think you'd want to suggest that without video, they're bogus. Be careful that you don't make an argument you don't want to make! You might be able to say that WITH video, they'd those guys could have been even more profound, but that doesn't take away from what they accomplished WITHOUT video.