Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 11:29 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 11:29
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
AbdurRakib
Joined: 11 May 2014
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 465
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 220
Status:I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE:Business Development (Real Estate)
Posts: 465
Kudos: 42,849
 [211]
22
Kudos
Add Kudos
187
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,536
 [112]
63
Kudos
Add Kudos
48
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
15,177
 [31]
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,177
 [31]
20
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
 [5]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
AbdurRakib
Tides typically range from three to six feet, but while some places show no tides at all, some others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of at least thirty feet and more.

(A) some others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of at least thirty feet and more
(B) the others, such as the Bay of Fundy, that have tides of more than thirty feet
(C) others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of more than thirty feet
(D) those at the Bay of Fundy, which has tides of more than thirty feet
(E) the ones at the Bay of Fundy have tides of at least thirty feet and more

Concepts tested here: Pronouns + Grammatical Construction + Awkwardness/Redundancy

A: This answer choice uses the redundant phrases "some others" and "at least thirty feet and more", rendering it awkward and needlessly wordy.

B: This answer choice fails to form a complete sentence; as the verb "have" is part of a modifying phrase, there is no active verb to act upon the subject "the others".

C: Correct. This answer choice acts upon the subject "others" with the active verb "have" to form a complete thought, leading to a complete sentence. Further, in the sentence formed by Option C, the pronoun "others" clearly and logically refers to the noun "places".

D: This answer choice fails to form a complete sentence; as the verb "has" is part of a modifying phrase, there is no active verb to act upon the subject "the others". Further, Option D suffers from a pronoun error, as the pronoun "those" lacks a clear and logical referent.

E: This answer choice suffers from a pronoun error, as the pronoun "ones" lacks a clear and logical referent. Further, Option E uses the needlessly wordy phrase "at least thirty feet and more", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

Hence, C is the best answer choice.

All the best!
Experts' Global Team
General Discussion
avatar
somtsat99
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 10 Jan 2016
Last visit: 30 Jan 2021
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
86
 [6]
Given Kudos: 1,220
Status:MBA Candidate Class of 2020
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 670 Q50 V31
GPA: 4
WE:Business Development (Consulting)
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In original sentence it says tides can be atleast 30 feet but Option C says more than 30 feet. Doesn't it change the meaning of the original sentence. ?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,514
Own Kudos:
5,728
 [6]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,514
Kudos: 5,728
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
somtsat99
In original sentence it says tides can be atleast 30 feet but Option C says more than 30 feet. Doesn't it change the meaning of the original sentence. ?

Posted from my mobile device

Hi somtsat99 ,

You missed a very small point in option A.

It says atleast 30 feet AND more. This means it has to be greater than 30. Hence, option C is clearly maintaining the original meaning.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,536
 [11]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,536
 [11]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
somtsat99
In original sentence it says tides can be atleast 30 feet but Option C says more than 30 feet. Doesn't it change the meaning of the original sentence. ?
Dear somtsat99,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, I think you are bringing mathematical logic to a SC question. Why this is problematic is very subtle.

You see, in math, we can talk about the precise number 30. If it's true that x = 30, then the statements x > 30 and x < 30 are both false. In the realm of mathematics, there's an infinity of difference between, say, 30 and 30 + (10^-50). Mathematics is realm of perfect precision.

Now, the thing that many students don't appreciate is that this side of math, the perfect precision, absolutely does not exist in the real world. It's funny: in math class and on the Quant section of the GMAT, you need to have this mindset of precision, but in many ways, that precision is a fiction that doesn't exist anywhere else.

Here, in this problem, we are talking about ocean tides. Whether the ocean is at high tide or low tide, there are always waves, sometimes small waves and sometimes large waves. I don't think it would make sense to talk about a tide that was exactly mathematically 30 ft. Among other things, a measurement of that magnitude would involve measurements down to the individual atom, and I can guarantee that the oceanographers who are studying these tides are not concerned with individual atoms. Similarly, 30 and 30 + (10^-50) are completely distinct mathematically, but no scientists on the planet could possibly measure a difference as small as (10^-50) feet--that's considerably smaller than most subatomic particles.

In the fictional realm of mathematical precision, there is a precise difference between "at least 30 ft," which means T >= 30, and "more than 30 feet," which means T > 30. Those two are completely different in the fictional realm of mathematical precision, but any distinction between those two is 100% meaningless in the real physical world of measurement. Thus, the change from one to the other would be a profound mathematical difference but absolutely no difference in the real world. Thus, it entails no difference in meaning in the world of GMAT SC, which reflects the real world, not the fictional world of mathematics.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
lary301254M7
Joined: 28 Jan 2018
Last visit: 17 Apr 2023
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 273
Location: Taiwan
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.34
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
Posts: 111
Kudos: 80
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could the reason B & D are wrong be that both answer choices are fragments without a verb in the second part of the sentence?

but while some places show no tides at all,
B. the others, such as the Bay of Fundy, that have tides of more than thirty feet
D. those at the Bay of Fundy, which has tides of more than thirty feet
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [2]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lary301254M7
Could the reason B & D are wrong be that both answer choices are fragments without a verb in the second part of the sentence?

but while some places show no tides at all,
B. the others, such as the Bay of Fundy, that have tides of more than thirty feet
D. those at the Bay of Fundy, which has tides of more than thirty feet
Hi lary301254M7, B and D do have a verb in the second part of the sentence (have and has respectively).

The issue with these options is the absence of a main verb (basically the verb of an Independent clause is called the main verb). The sentence needed an Independent clause, because of the presence of but in the original sentence.

But is a coordinating conjunction that connects two Independent clauses. While the first part of the sentence is an Independent clause (Tides typically range from three to six feet), the second part (after the but) does not have any Independent clause in options B and D.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Independent clauses, their application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
User avatar
Abhi077
User avatar
SC Moderator
Joined: 25 Sep 2018
Last visit: 18 Apr 2025
Posts: 1,084
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,665
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.97
WE:Investment Banking (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Posts: 1,084
Kudos: 2,403
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. at least 30 feet and more translated to >= 30 C. 30 more than 30 feet translates to >30 which changes the meaning of the sentence. can anyone please explain?
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Abhi077
A. at least 30 feet and more translated to >= 30 C. 30 more than 30 feet translates to >30 which changes the meaning of the sentence. can anyone please explain?
Hi Abhi, very technically speaking, an argument may be put forth that at least 30 feet or more translates to > = 30, while at least 30 feet and more translates to > 30.

Having said that, this kind of minor mathematical nitpicking might not be the best way to approach a sentence correction question.
User avatar
Businessconquerer
Joined: 17 Jul 2018
Last visit: 07 Jul 2025
Posts: 2,841
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 185
Products:
Posts: 2,841
Kudos: 1,182
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AbdurRakib
The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2018
Practice Question
Sentence Correction
Question No.: 745
Tides typically range from three to six feet, but while some places show no tides at all, some others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of at least thirty feet and more.

A. some others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of at least thirty feet and more
B. the others, such as the Bay of Fundy, that have tides of more than thirty feet
C. others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of more than thirty feet
D. those at the Bay of Fundy, which has tides of more than thirty feet
E. the ones at the Bay of Fundy have tides of at least thirty feet and more


The question is included in past OGs for a long time for some reasons that most test takers ignore
This question has a very direct answer, but, it is essential to take "all the juice out of the cane"

The question is presenting a concept of "WORDINESS" and I suppose all the solutions presented have included the reason to by pass the question. Now let us look at another approach, an approach that is usually helpful in the higher difficulty questions

SO LET US BEGIN

Round 1 MISSING VERB
On GMAT every sentence is of the type S+V+O(can be indirect)
here
option B has no verb, just a modifier clause that if you read clearly leaves you wanting more
D has same issue

Round 2 HIDDEN PARALLELISM
Very tricky to be observed
While some people eat, the ones in my house have drinking problem
v
While some eat, the others in my house have a drinking problem.4

Do you see it??
While some....., the others

not "some others" as in option A
E is eliminated for this reason


C is the winner!!!!!!!
User avatar
IloveMBA123
Joined: 22 Jul 2019
Last visit: 22 Mar 2024
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 64
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
is "at least" equivalent to "more than"?

I chose answer A because "at least" and "more than" are not the same thing; Is not changing from "at least" to "more than" changes the the intention of the message the author try to convey?
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
waihoe520
is "at least" equivalent to "more than"?
No, but at least and more is equivalent to more than.

However, it is very unlikely that GMAT would test you on these differences.
User avatar
MikeScarn
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 01 Jun 2025
Posts: 275
Own Kudos:
1,280
 [2]
Given Kudos: 227
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT 1: 690 Q44 V41
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.62
WE:Sales (Computer Software)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AbdurRakib
Tides typically range from three to six feet, but while some places show no tides at all, some others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of at least thirty feet and more.

AbdurRakib
(A) some others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of at least thirty feet and more
of at least thirty feet and more is redundant and incorrect.
AbdurRakib
(B) the others, such as the Bay of Fundy, that have tides of more than thirty feet
This answer choice becomes a sentence fragment. Let's look at the sentence without the non-essential modifier.

Tides typically range from three to six feet, but while some places show no tides at all, the others, such as the Bay of Fundy, that have tides of more than thirty feet.

"the others that have tides of more than thirty feet"???

The "that" conjunction is not needed and is confusing.
AbdurRakib
(C) others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of more than thirty feet
Nothing wrong here. Let's remove the non-essential modifier.

Tides typically range from three to six feet, but while some places show no tides at all, others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of more than thirty feet

Perfect.
AbdurRakib
(D) those at the Bay of Fundy, which has tides of more than thirty feet
Pronoun "those" refers to "tides" and we can substitute "the tides" for "those" to see if the pronoun makes sense.

"those" is fine, but "has" is incorrectly in singular form. Further, "which has" makes the same conjunction error as in (B)
AbdurRakib
(E) the ones at the Bay of Fundy have tides of at least thirty feet and more
"ones" refers to "tides." Fine. But now we have redundancy. If we substitute "tides" for "ones," we get a redundancy.

"the tides at the Bay of Funcy have tides of at least thirty feet and more.

Further, this answer choice makes the same mistake as (A). "of at least thirty feet and more" is inccorect.
avatar
GAURAV1113
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 10 Sep 2023
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92
Location: India
Schools: ISB'22 (A)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Schools: ISB'22 (A)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 37
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
I picked option-A instead of C.
My logic:
C is grouping places in 2 types only: First without tides, other one with tide> 30 feet. Isn’t it the wrong meaning?
Option A with “some others” leaves scope of different length of waves possible. I understand “at least 30 feet and more” is redundant, but option C changes the meaning.
Any one, please help on this.
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,786
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,786
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GAURAV1113
Hi,
I picked option-A instead of C.
My logic:
C is grouping places in 2 types only: First without tides, other one with tide> 30 feet. Isn’t it the wrong meaning?
Option A with “some others” leaves scope of different length of waves possible. I understand “at least 30 feet and more” is redundant, but option C changes the meaning.
Any one, please help on this.
GMATNinja
There's a common misconception that it's wrong for an answer choice to "change the meaning." There's no original meaning you need to preserve. Instead, think of it this way: there are five sentences. You want the one that's clearest and most logical.

Take another look at (C):

Quote:
Tides typically range from three to six feet, but while some places show no tides at all, others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of more than thirty feet.
This option is saying that some places have no tides at all, while others have tides that are more than 30 feet tall. That seems perfectly fine. Surfer A is sitting on a calm, placid sea, bummed that he can't catch a wave. Surfer B is catching massive waves, over 30 feet tall. Maybe they're 31 feet tall; maybe they're 46 feet tall. This seems perfectly logical and clear.

You noted correctly that, in (A), the phrase, "at least 30 feet and more," is redundant. Worse, it's confusing. If we know that "at least 30 feet" captures any value that's 30 or greater, "the more" seems like it might refer to something other than height. But nothing else is specified, so the reader is left scratching her head, trying to puzzle out the meaning. At least 30 feet and more... dangerous? At least 30 feet and more... full of sharks? Who knows?

So rather than worry about whether (C) changes the meaning, ask yourself whether (C) is clearer. Because it is, it's a better answer choice.

I hope that helps!
avatar
AVyas13397
Joined: 27 Feb 2021
Last visit: 26 Jul 2021
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 6
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
option A here says that ''SOME OTHERS''

While Option C says ''OTHERS'', this should make meaning distortion
As option C is referring to all the others while the original sentence is only saying about some others.!!!!

Would appreciate anyone could comment here.
User avatar
MBAB123
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Last visit: 30 Jul 2023
Posts: 563
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 151
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 563
Kudos: 318
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AVyas13397
option A here says that ''SOME OTHERS''

While Option C says ''OTHERS'', this should make meaning distortion
As option C is referring to all the others while the original sentence is only saying about some others.!!!!

Would appreciate anyone could comment here.

AVyas13397 others does not imply all the remaining tides. Also, there is no such thing as the original sentence. Option A is just another option. The only non-negotiable part of an SC question is the non-underlined portion. See GMATninja's post above for more on this.
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
we dont need to focus on "others" to find the OA. but lets think about this point.

"the others"
"the" means you already know the entity. if you dont know the entities, you cant use "the". some examples are

there are 3 girls. one of them is from Havard, the others is from Standford.

in this sentence, we already know "the others" , so, "the " is correct.

in our problem, "some" precedes and "others" follow. this context means, we can not know the entity after "others" and we can not use "the others".

choice D and E change the meaning. "those at bay" is mentioned as an example not as what is compared. but honestly, this meaning change is hard to realize in the test room. D and E suffer clear mistakes, incorrect structure and redundance " more", so, eliminate them on the basis of the clear mistake first
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts