It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 05:32

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

To become an expert on a musical instrument, a person must

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 105

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

To become an expert on a musical instrument, a person must [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2008, 03:23
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

To become an expert on a musical instrument, a person must practice. If people practice a musical instrument for three hours each day, they will eventually become experts on that instrument. Therefore, if a person is an expert on a musical instrument, that person must have practiced for at least three hours each day.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the reasoning above?
(A) The conclusion fails to take into account that people who practice for three hours every day might not yet have reached a degree of proficiency that everyone would consider expert.
(B) The conclusion fails to take into account that practicing for less than three hours each day may be enough for some people to become experts.
(C) The conclusion fails to take into account that if a person has not practiced for at least three hours a day, the person has not become an expert.
(D) The conclusion fails to take into account that three consecutive hours of daily practice is not recommended by all music teachers.
(E) The conclusion fails to take into account that few people have the spare time necessary to devote three hours daily to practice.

what is the ans ? describe
pls
shobuj

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: cr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2008, 05:47
shobuj wrote:
To become an expert on a musical instrument, a person must practice. If people practice a musical instrument for three hours each day, they will eventually become experts on that instrument. Therefore, if a person is an expert on a musical instrument, that person must have practiced for at least three hours each day.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the reasoning above?
(A) The conclusion fails to take into account that people who practice for three hours every day might not yet have reached a degree of proficiency that everyone would consider expert.
(B) The conclusion fails to take into account that practicing for less than three hours each day may be enough for some people to become experts.
(C) The conclusion fails to take into account that if a person has not practiced for at least three hours a day, the person has not become an expert.
(D) The conclusion fails to take into account that three consecutive hours of daily practice is not recommended by all music teachers.
(E) The conclusion fails to take into account that few people have the spare time necessary to devote three hours daily to practice.

what is the ans ? describe
plse
shobuj


Beat the conclusion that to be an expert, musician must have practice at least 3 hours a day
B the only answer that puts the conclusion into the corner

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 280

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 3

Re: cr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2008, 08:17
very tough question
i wud also go with answer B.

but whats the OA ?

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 3

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 28

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: cr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2008, 03:28
Is it B?

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 320

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Location: India
Re: cr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2008, 03:54
Conclusion: If a person is an expert on a musical instrument, that person must have practiced for at least three hours each day

The author further says the basic condition "If people practice a musical instrument for three hours each day, they will eventually become experts on that instrument"

Hence the argument rests on 3 hours of practice as the necessary condition to learn a musical instrument. Answer option C/D/E are all out of scope. A and B are the closest. If you look at B closely, it mentions practicing less than three hours, a condition that is not in the purview of the argument. Hence the answer option A.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 34 [1], given: 0

Location: India
Re: cr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2008, 05:00
1
This post received
KUDOS
I will go for A.

Why?
CDE can be eliminated easily as they are not even related to subjects in the arguments.

The choice is between A and B.

Statement says "f people practice a musical instrument for three hours each day, they will eventually become experts on that instrument" or if I can rephrase, it means "if A, eventually B"

It does not talk about "if not A, then B or not B". Thus A.
_________________

http://twitter.com/Saurabh

Kudos [?]: 34 [1], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 494

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 66

Location: Kolkata
Re: cr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2008, 05:09
perfectly agree with the above two posts..its a...whats the oa?

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 66

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 315

Kudos [?]: 91 [1], given: 4

Location: Washington DC
Re: cr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2008, 11:59
1
This post received
KUDOS
I would go for B as clearly speaks about the flaw. It might be possible for few to become an expert with less than 3 hours practice everyday.

Now OA please?

Kudos [?]: 91 [1], given: 4

Re: cr   [#permalink] 28 Mar 2008, 11:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

To become an expert on a musical instrument, a person must

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.