Last visit was: 14 Jul 2024, 10:59 It is currently 14 Jul 2024, 10:59
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2018
Posts: 49
Own Kudos [?]: 210 [6]
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GPA: 4
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2018
Posts: 49
Own Kudos [?]: 210 [0]
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GPA: 4
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 257
Own Kudos [?]: 238 [1]
Given Kudos: 359
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36 (Online)
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2018
Posts: 49
Own Kudos [?]: 210 [1]
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GPA: 4
Re: Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
1
Kudos
ArupRS wrote:
LMP wrote:
ArupRS wrote:
Straight B.

Hi Arup ,
What was the approach?

LMP

First, what is the subject? The subject is "Top House Democrats" - Plural subject. So, A.C and E are wrong.
Now we are left with B and D.
This is a tricky part. You can either use idiom or S-V agreement again. Accused of is idiomatic but nit accused in(Please verify this part).
Accuses is the correct choice. Accused is not correct.
So B is correct.

Regards,
Arup

thank you Arup. Missed the Idiom part. Even Iw as confused between B and D.
VP
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Status:It's near - I can see.
Posts: 1467
Own Kudos [?]: 1636 [0]
Given Kudos: 1002
Location: India
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Re: Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
LMP wrote:
Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, insists on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of if the Justice Department accuses President in wrongdoing.

a) insists on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of if the Justice Department accuses President in wrongdoing

Subject is Plural (THDs) , therefore verb "insists" is wrong. We need "insisted" from the given choices.

b) insisted on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of whether the Justice Department accuses President of wrongdoing.

c) insists on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of if the Justice Department accused President in wrongdoing

Subject is Plural (THDs) , therefore verb "insists" is wrong. We need "insisted" from the given choices.

We need "accuses" to make sense and not "accused"

d) insisted on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of whether the Justice Department accused President in wrongdoing.

We need "accuses" to make sense and not "accused"

e) insists on Sunday which their own investigations must go on regardless of if the Justice Department accuses President in wrongdoing

Subject is Plural (THDs) , therefore verb "insists" is wrong. We need "insisted" from the given choices.

Use of "which" is wrong here.
Intern
Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
GMAT 1: 480 Q48 V14
Re: Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
Can anyone please let me know which one is correct ...." President of wrongdoing" or " president in wrongdoing"

Posted from my mobile device
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 257
Own Kudos [?]: 238 [0]
Given Kudos: 359
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36 (Online)
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
rakeshtewatia0105 wrote:
Can anyone please let me know which one is correct ...." President of wrongdoing" or " president in wrongdoing"

Posted from my mobile device

Actual question should be accuses president of wrongdoing v/s accuses president in wrongdoing.
I think accuses of is the correct form.
Regards,
Arup
VP
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Status:It's near - I can see.
Posts: 1467
Own Kudos [?]: 1636 [1]
Given Kudos: 1002
Location: India
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Re: Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
1
Kudos
rakeshtewatia0105 wrote:
Can anyone please let me know which one is correct ...." President of wrongdoing" or " president in wrongdoing"

Posted from my mobile device

Correct idiom is Accuse X of Y.

You should not connect "President + of"

You should look for "Accuse + of"

In place of President, it can be anything else.

Accuse teacher of slapping

Accuse staff of misbehaving

Accuse John of robbing
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2018
Posts: 277
Own Kudos [?]: 411 [2]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 580 Q47 V23
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V27
GPA: 4
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, insists on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of if the Justice Department accuses President in wrongdoing.

Quote:
a) insists on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of if the Justice Department accuses President in wrongdoing

There are two actions here. 1) Robert insisted on Sunday that their own investigations must go on. 2) Whether justice accuses president in wrongdoing. Here action 1 is completed and action 2 is yet to happen. So action we have to use insisted rather than insists and for action 2 we have to use futuristic accuses rather than accused. So this choice can be ELIMINATED
Quote:
b) insisted on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of whether the Justice Department accuses President of wrongdoing.

This is the only choice which conveys the intended meaning. So CORRECT
Quote:
c) insists on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of if the Justice Department accused President in wrongdoing

Same error as in option A. So ELIMINATED
Quote:
d) insisted on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of whether the Justice Department accused President in wrongdoing.

Here accused is used instead if accuses. So ELIMINATED
Quote:
e) insists on Sunday which their own investigations must go on regardless of if the Justice Department accuses President in wrongdoing

Same error as in option A. So ELIMINATED

OPTION: B
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5301
Own Kudos [?]: 4731 [2]
Given Kudos: 657
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Re: Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
2
Kudos
LMP wrote:
b) insisted on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of whether the Justice Department accuses President of wrongdoing.
B is itself incorrect. We can't "accuse President".

You can fix B by:
1. Adding a name for the person (accuses President Trump of wrongdoing)
or
2. Adding a the before President (accuses the President of wrongdoing).
VP
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Status:It's near - I can see.
Posts: 1467
Own Kudos [?]: 1636 [0]
Given Kudos: 1002
Location: India
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Re: Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
AjiteshArun wrote:
LMP wrote:
b) insisted on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of whether the Justice Department accuses President of wrongdoing.
B is itself incorrect. We can't "accuse President".

You can fix B by:
1. Adding a name for the person (accuses President Trump of wrongdoing)
or
2. Adding a the before President (accuses the President of wrongdoing).

This difference is so subtle that it goes unnoticed every time.

Please clear my thought process ;

When we say only "President" , we are using a "noun" that has no real reference or has a general reference, and that is wrong.

When we say "President Trump" or " The President", we mean someone particular about whom we are talking.

I have two queries :

1. When we can remove the articles " A , An, and The" before the noun?

2. When this removal of article changes the meaning and how the meaning changes?
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2018
Posts: 49
Own Kudos [?]: 210 [0]
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GPA: 4
Re: Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
AjiteshArun wrote:
LMP wrote:
b) insisted on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of whether the Justice Department accuses President of wrongdoing.
B is itself incorrect. We can't "accuse President".

You can fix B by:
1. Adding a name for the person (accuses President Trump of wrongdoing)
or
2. Adding a the before President (accuses the President of wrongdoing).

I agree with you Ajitesh. You are right. It should have been " President Trump" or " the President" .
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5301
Own Kudos [?]: 4731 [1]
Given Kudos: 657
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Re: Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
1
Kudos
AkshdeepS wrote:
This difference is so subtle that it goes unnoticed every time.

Please clear my thought process ;

When we say only "President" , we are using a "noun" that has no real reference or has a general reference, and that is wrong.

When we say "President Trump" or " The President", we mean someone particular about whom we are talking.

I have two queries :

1. When we can remove the articles " A , An, and The" before the noun?

2. When this removal of article changes the meaning and how the meaning changes?
Check whether the noun is plural or singular (if it is singular, check whether it is a countable noun). We don't always need an article before a plural noun unless we're trying to specify something (but we must have something before a singular noun, as long as it is not a name or a non-count noun). So we can say:
Movies are great.

but we can't say
Movie is great.

This doesn't apply to mass (non-count) nouns, however, so something like this is fine:
Water is essential for life.

Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2019
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 42 [0]
Given Kudos: 94
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GRE 1: Q168 V155
GPA: 3.27
WE:Web Design (Computer Software)
Re: Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
rakeshtewatia0105 wrote:
Can anyone please let me know which one is correct ...." President of wrongdoing" or " president in wrongdoing"

Posted from my mobile device

President of wrongdoing goes better here.
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 306
Own Kudos [?]: 76 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Re: Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
AjiteshArun wrote:
LMP wrote:
b) insisted on Sunday that their own investigations must go on regardless of whether the Justice Department accuses President of wrongdoing.
B is itself incorrect. We can't "accuse President".

You can fix B by:
1. Adding a name for the person (accuses President Trump of wrongdoing)
or
2. Adding a the before President (accuses the President of wrongdoing).

Isn't accuse president of wrongdoing -----implies "president of wrong doing".......

Also please let me know "accused for ..." is correct or not .....or " accused of ...." is correct?

because "president of X" ....doesn't make sense to me.

thanks
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5301
Own Kudos [?]: 4731 [0]
Given Kudos: 657
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
jrk23 wrote:
Isn't accuse president of wrongdoing -----implies "president of wrong doing".......

Also please let me know "accused for ..." is correct or not .....or " accused of ...." is correct?

because "president of X" ....doesn't make sense to me.

thanks

Hi jrk23,

I see your point (and you may be interested in this official question).

Accuse X of Y is idiomatic. For is not an acceptable replacement for of in that construction.
Top House Democrats, anxiously awaiting the findings of the special co [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6979 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts