Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 00:03 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 00:03
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
sa18
Joined: 03 Jul 2015
Last visit: 07 Aug 2016
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 41
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
Posts: 27
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mbawarrior01
Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Last visit: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 198
WE:General Management (Other)
Posts: 91
Kudos: 373
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ashwini86
Joined: 26 May 2016
Last visit: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V32
GPA: 3.65
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V32
Posts: 32
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
arirux92
Joined: 03 May 2015
Last visit: 30 Nov 2016
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.49
WE:Web Development (Insurance)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
eladshus
Despite the lingering popularity of alternative health treatments for musculoskeletal injuries, such as acupuncture and chiropractic manipulation, it is quiet clear that the curative prowess of such so called remedies is questionable. In a recent survey of people who had tried at least one respondents reported that the thrapiest had little, if any, curative impact. People, with such injuries are, thus, well advised to forego alternative therapies in favor of traditional, interventive methods of treatment.

The above argument assumes that:

A. Other alternative therapies, such as aromatherapy, are not more effective than acupuncture or chiropractic medicine.
B. Traditional methods of treatment have a higher success rate than that of alternative therapies.
C. The survey participants had no reservations about the therapy methods they chose prior to receiving treatment.
D. No respondent had used any form of traditional treatment prior to the survey.
E. A combination of traditinoal and alternative therapies is the most optimal way to treat musculoskeletal aliments.

Hi,

When I solved the following question, I was debating between the first 2 answers, and eventually selected the wrong one.
Can you please help me realize why the wrong answer is wrong?

Thank you

Since doubt is between B and D, let me just focus on these two :

Premise : Survey - People who used alternative therapies had little success.
Conclusion : Traditional is better

Though the conclusion is about Traditional methods, there is no mention of it anywhere

Suppose there are two methods A and B :

We can't say

A succ rate = 0.1
Therefore B is better;
As we have no information about B. This question plays with your prejudice. success rate of B could be 99.999 or it could be 0.00001. You are stuck in your head because you think traditional methods are better but here those are just words. We have no info on traditional medicine whatsoever.

Therefore the correct assumption would compare success of A and B

As you can see, option B does that perfectly

Now coming to D. No respondent had used any form of traditional treatment prior to the survey.

So people tried method A for first time. Didn't work. So does that mean B will surely work?

No... we again need to compare the base rate. Without having any info about B, the conclusion is meaningless.


Only option B holds.
User avatar
cledgard
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Last visit: 11 Mar 2026
Posts: 163
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 72
Status:GMAT Coach
Location: Peru
GPA: 3.98
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 163
Kudos: 369
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sa18
akadmin
eladshus
Despite the lingering popularity of alternative health treatments for musculoskeletal injuries, such as acupuncture and chiropractic manipulation, it is quiet clear that the curative prowess of such so called remedies is questionable. In a recent survey of people who had tried at least one respondents reported that the thrapiest had little, if any, curative impact. People, with such injuries are, thus, well advised to forego alternative therapies in favor of traditional, interventive methods of treatment.

The above argument assumes that:

A. Other alternative therapies, such as aromatherapy, are not more effective than acupuncture or chiropractic medicine.
B. Traditional methods of treatment have a higher success rate than that of alternative therapies.
C. The survey participants had no reservations about the therapy methods they chose prior to receiving treatment.
D. No respondent had used any form of traditional treatment prior to the survey.
E. A combination of traditinoal and alternative therapies is the most optimal way to treat musculoskeletal aliments.

Hi,

When I solved the following question, I was debating between the first 2 answers, and eventually selected the wrong one.
Can you please help me realize why the wrong answer is wrong?

Thank you




Why not C? If the people had reservations then the result could be skewd

Having the same thought.
If the minds of the people are already biased, the survey results could be misleading.

C. The survey participants had no reservations about the therapy methods they chose prior to receiving treatment.

Even If the minds of the people are biased, and the survey results could be misleading, the argument is still valid. The conclusion - People, with such injuries are, thus, well advised to forego alternative therapies in favor of traditional, interventive methods of treatment. – is still valid; Premise C may weaken or strengthen the argument – we do not know in what direction – but its negation will not invalidate the argument.
User avatar
NikGujju
Joined: 20 Aug 2014
Last visit: 22 Apr 2021
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 163
Status:Target 760
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.6
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
eladshus
Despite the lingering popularity of alternative health treatments for musculoskeletal injuries, such as acupuncture and chiropractic manipulation, it is quiet clear that the curative prowess of such so called remedies is questionable. In a recent survey of people who had tried at least one respondents reported that the thrapiest had little, if any, curative impact. People, with such injuries are, thus, well advised to forego alternative therapies in favor of traditional, interventive methods of treatment.

The above argument assumes that:

A. Other alternative therapies, such as aromatherapy, are not more effective than acupuncture or chiropractic medicine.
B. Traditional methods of treatment have a higher success rate than that of alternative therapies.
C. The survey participants had no reservations about the therapy methods they chose prior to receiving treatment.
D. No respondent had used any form of traditional treatment prior to the survey.
E. A combination of traditinoal and alternative therapies is the most optimal way to treat musculoskeletal aliments.

Hi,

When I solved the following question, I was debating between the first 2 answers, and eventually selected the wrong one.
Can you please help me realize why the wrong answer is wrong?

Thank you

The two best choices for this question are
B. Traditional methods of treatment have a higher success rate than that of alternative therapies. using negation technique, in case the success rate of traditional therapies is not higher than that of alternative therapies, then there is no rationale to shift
C. The survey participants had no reservations about the therapy methods they chose prior to receiving treatment. Using negation technique,
if they had reservations then what? if it is effective then it makes sense for them to shift.
User avatar
RamSep
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Last visit: 23 Oct 2020
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105
Location: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
GPA: 3.64
WE:Management Consulting (Energy)
Posts: 35
Kudos: 47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option E is interesting and would be the correct choice if it was just negated.
User avatar
punith0894
Joined: 25 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Nov 2023
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Products:
Posts: 21
Kudos: 16
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why is option C wrong? If the participants have pre-conceived notions about the therapy methods, the results could be flawed and hence the conclusion would break apart, would't it?
User avatar
danielmeyers
Joined: 03 Sep 2022
Last visit: 11 Oct 2022
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Belgium
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
punith0894
Why is option C wrong? If the participants have pre-conceived notions about the therapy methods, the results could be flawed and hence the conclusion would break apart, would't it?
I completely agree with you. Everyone is bound to have a preconceived notion of the therapies they choose, and they depend primarily on the conditions in which they live, the society around them, their social status, the traditions in which they grew up, and many, many other factors. So, for example, it will be very difficult to convince a resident of New York that alternative therapies such as acupuncture and others will be more effective than traditional treatments at an urban clinic. It would be difficult to explain to a villager in the mountains of Tibet about the effectiveness of modern methods of treatment, some methods I learned about relatively recently when I ordered custom essays on https://writemypapers4me.net/custom-writing-service/. And lastly, both for the former and for the latter, traditional methods and alternative methods will be completely different
User avatar
A_Nishith
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 452
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 452
Kudos: 203
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Argument Analysis
Premise: Despite the popularity of alternative health treatments like acupuncture and chiropractic manipulation, their curative prowess is questionable.
Evidence: A recent survey of people who tried these treatments reported little, if any, curative impact.
Conclusion: People with musculoskeletal injuries are advised to forego alternative therapies in favor of traditional, interventive methods of treatment.

Identifying the Assumption
An assumption is an unstated premise that must be true for the argument to hold. Here, the argument concludes that traditional methods should be preferred over alternative therapies based on the survey results. The assumption would need to bridge the gap between the survey results and the conclusion.

Analyzing Each Option
(A) Other alternative therapies, such as aromatherapy, are not more effective than acupuncture or chiropractic medicine.

This option is about other alternative therapies, not directly addressing the comparison between traditional and the mentioned alternative therapies.

(B) Traditional methods of treatment have a higher success rate than that of alternative therapies.

This option directly supports the conclusion. If traditional methods have a higher success rate, it justifies advising against alternative therapies. This is the assumption needed for the argument to hold.

(C) The survey participants had no reservations about the therapy methods they chose prior to receiving treatment.

This option addresses potential bias in the survey but does not directly support the conclusion about the efficacy of traditional versus alternative therapies.

(D) No respondent had used any form of traditional treatment prior to the survey.

This option comments on the prior experiences of the respondents but does not address the relative efficacy of traditional versus alternative therapies.

(E) A combination of traditional and alternative therapies is the most optimal way to treat musculoskeletal ailments.

This option suggests a combination of treatments, which contradicts the argument's conclusion that favors traditional methods alone.

Conclusion
The correct answer is (B):
Traditional methods of treatment have a higher success rate than that of alternative therapies. This assumption supports the argument's conclusion that traditional methods should be preferred over alternative therapies.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,419
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,419
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts