anuj.gmat
Hi Mike,
Why is option B faulty?
mggmat17
Thanks for explaining,Can you please explain why the option B is incorrect ? if we go by the above rule- 'Due to' modifies the noun cancellation.
Dear
anuj.gmat and
mggmat17,
I'm happy to respond.
Choice (B) is a train wreck disaster. First of all, it is unclear whether this version intends the "
due to" to modify the object "
cancellation" or the action of the verb "
brought about." The former would be grammatical correct and the latter would not be.
Let's change (B) to eliminate that problem:
(B1) =
the cancellation of the entire project, due to unstable bedrock in that region, may be brought aboutThis is 100% grammatical correct and still a disaster. This is precisely the kind of answer choice that is such a powerful trap for non-native speakers looking exclusively at grammar, precisely because it certainly is 100% correct at the level of grammar, and yet, it is so bad as an answer choice that it deserves to be taken out back and shot.
You see, the GMAT SC is NOT primarily a test of grammar. It is a test of grammar,
logic, and
rhetoric, and it examines the ways that these three elements reinforce one another to produce meaning.
This version is flawless grammatically and yet a rhetorical disaster. The action, the doing, is congealed into a noun, "
cancellation" and the verb, what should be the vital driving center of this clause, is the lily-livered "
may be brought about." It is as if there were a contest to say the facts in as indirect and punchless a way as possible: this version could be the winner of that contest.
Effective writing makes locates the action of the clause, the principal doing, in the verb itself. Putting the main action in a noun and having a non-action verb of being is a sure-fire way to make the sentence flaccid and spineless--in other words, a rhetorical failure.
This is why (B) doesn't even come within a 100 meters of being correct, even though it has no grammatical flaws.
Choice (E) doesn't make "
cancel" the verb, but it has the verb "
may necessitate," which is a logically powerful verb, a far more powerful center than "
may be brought about."
Does all this make sense?
Mike