Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
16 Jul 2024, 00:37
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
The speech makes two main claims : Clean energy bill has aided in
1. Increased renewable energy usage.
2. Reduced electricity cost for consumers.
A - Talks about the cost of setting up renewable energy projects. Isn't relevant to the two points.
B - The years prior to the implementation of the bill have no bearing on the two claims.
C - We do not know what portion of the overall projects these 'some projects' refer to. We cannot ascertain the extent to which they contribute to the total renewable energy usage. If anything, this point might weaken claim 1.
E - Out of scope. The areas outside the influence of the bill serve no purpose to the speech.
Quote:
Strengthens. If the average cost of electricity from non renewable sources has been above the national average, and the average cost from renewable energy sources has been less than the national average, it directly supports the second claim - the bill has helped reduce the electricity cost for consumers.
OPTION D
16 Jul 2024, 00:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
Environmental Policy Speech: Critics of the new Clean Energy Bill argue that it will lead to higher energy costs due to the implementation of expensive renewable energy technologies. However, since the bill was passed, not only has the number of renewable energy projects increased significantly, but the average cost of electricity from these sources has been lower than the national average cost of electricity every year. Thus, it is clear that the Clean Energy Bill has been effective in not only increasing renewable energy usage but also in reducing electricity costs for consumers.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the policy speech?
(A) The cost of setting up renewable energy projects has decreased globally due to technological advancements over the last five years.
- This option speaks about implementation cost, but the conclusion is about cost to consumers. Hence out of scope
(B) Electricity costs were rising at a rate above the national average in the years immediately before the Clean Energy Bill was implemented.
- Eventually it says that costs rose before clean energy implementation hence the implementation seems cost effective relatively. This is in turn weakening the argument
(C) Some of the renewable energy projects started under the Clean Energy Bill have been discontinued due to technological inefficiencies.
- Doesn't make a difference
(D) The average cost of electricity generated from conventional (non-renewable) sources has remained consistently higher than the national average during the same period.
- Cost of generation is highlighted. We need to see if cost to consumers are affected.
(E) The price of electricity in areas outside the influence of the Clean Energy Bill has risen due to increased costs of non-renewable energy resources.
- Here it says price has increased due to higher cost. Hence it indicates that clean energy has saved money of consumers. This is correct.
Option E
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the policy speech?
(A) The cost of setting up renewable energy projects has decreased globally due to technological advancements over the last five years.
- This option speaks about implementation cost, but the conclusion is about cost to consumers. Hence out of scope
(B) Electricity costs were rising at a rate above the national average in the years immediately before the Clean Energy Bill was implemented.
- Eventually it says that costs rose before clean energy implementation hence the implementation seems cost effective relatively. This is in turn weakening the argument
(C) Some of the renewable energy projects started under the Clean Energy Bill have been discontinued due to technological inefficiencies.
- Doesn't make a difference
(D) The average cost of electricity generated from conventional (non-renewable) sources has remained consistently higher than the national average during the same period.
- Cost of generation is highlighted. We need to see if cost to consumers are affected.
(E) The price of electricity in areas outside the influence of the Clean Energy Bill has risen due to increased costs of non-renewable energy resources.
- Here it says price has increased due to higher cost. Hence it indicates that clean energy has saved money of consumers. This is correct.
Option E
16 Jul 2024, 01:07
Kudos
Bookmarks
Ans D
Environmental Policy Speech: Critics of the new Clean Energy Bill argue that it will lead to higher energy costs due to the implementation of expensive renewable energy technologies. However, since the bill was passed, not only has the number of renewable energy projects increased significantly, but the average cost of electricity from these sources has been lower than the national average cost of electricity every year (support). Conclusion: Thus, it is clear that the Clean Energy Bill has been effective in not only increasing renewable energy usage but also in reducing electricity costs for consumers.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the policy speech?
(A) The cost of setting up renewable energy projects has decreased globally due to technological advancements over the last five years. - Without mention of impact of decrease in cost of renewable energy on total cost of electricity the statement doesn't provide any support for the conclusion
(B) Electricity costs were rising at a rate above the national average in the years immediately before the Clean Energy Bill was implemented: Doesn't mention what happened after implementation
(C) Some of the renewable energy projects started under the Clean Energy Bill have been discontinued due to technological inefficiencies.: Doesn't mention cost or usage
(D) The average cost of electricity generated from conventional (non-renewable) sources has remained consistently higher than the national average during the same period: This supports the conclusion by implying that lower average cost of electricity from renewable sources, which is lower than average total cost of electricity, has reduced the total cost of electricity
(E) The price of electricity in areas outside the influence of the Clean Energy Bill has risen due to increased costs of non-renewable energy resources: Out of scope since the argument is focussed only on areas influenced by Clean Energy Bill
Environmental Policy Speech: Critics of the new Clean Energy Bill argue that it will lead to higher energy costs due to the implementation of expensive renewable energy technologies. However, since the bill was passed, not only has the number of renewable energy projects increased significantly, but the average cost of electricity from these sources has been lower than the national average cost of electricity every year (support). Conclusion: Thus, it is clear that the Clean Energy Bill has been effective in not only increasing renewable energy usage but also in reducing electricity costs for consumers.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the policy speech?
(A) The cost of setting up renewable energy projects has decreased globally due to technological advancements over the last five years. - Without mention of impact of decrease in cost of renewable energy on total cost of electricity the statement doesn't provide any support for the conclusion
(B) Electricity costs were rising at a rate above the national average in the years immediately before the Clean Energy Bill was implemented: Doesn't mention what happened after implementation
(C) Some of the renewable energy projects started under the Clean Energy Bill have been discontinued due to technological inefficiencies.: Doesn't mention cost or usage
(D) The average cost of electricity generated from conventional (non-renewable) sources has remained consistently higher than the national average during the same period: This supports the conclusion by implying that lower average cost of electricity from renewable sources, which is lower than average total cost of electricity, has reduced the total cost of electricity
(E) The price of electricity in areas outside the influence of the Clean Energy Bill has risen due to increased costs of non-renewable energy resources: Out of scope since the argument is focussed only on areas influenced by Clean Energy Bill
