GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 Mar 2019, 22:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 747
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Mar 2019, 22:39
1
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (01:46) correct 40% (02:00) wrong based on 84 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered by the local media, and this coverage seems to have contributed to the record-breaking attendance it drew. If the attendance at the exhibit had been low, the museum would have gone bankrupt and closed permanently, so the museum could not have remained open had it not been for the coverage from the local media.

The reasoning in the trustee’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument


(A) confuses a necessary condition for the museum’s remaining open with a sufficient condition for the museum’s remaining open

(B) takes for granted that no previous exhibit at the museum had received such extensive media coverage

(C) takes for granted that most people who read articles about the exhibit also attended the exhibit

(D) fails to address the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors to prevent bankruptcy even without media coverage

(E) presupposes the very conclusion that it is trying to prove

_________________

Regards,
Gladi



“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)

Most Helpful Expert Reply
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
D
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9007
Location: Pune, India
Re: Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Mar 2019, 03:42
1
Gladiator59 wrote:
Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered by the local media, and this coverage seems to have contributed to the record-breaking attendance it drew. If the attendance at the exhibit had been low, the museum would have gone bankrupt and closed permanently, so the museum could not have remained open had it not been for the coverage from the local media.

The reasoning in the trustee’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument


(A) confuses a necessary condition for the museum’s remaining open with a sufficient condition for the museum’s remaining open

(B) takes for granted that no previous exhibit at the museum had received such extensive media coverage

(C) takes for granted that most people who read articles about the exhibit also attended the exhibit

(D) fails to address the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors to prevent bankruptcy even without media coverage

(E) presupposes the very conclusion that it is trying to prove


The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered by the local media, - a fact given to support the conclusion
and this coverage seems to have contributed to the record-breaking attendance it drew - not sure. "seems to have" conveys possibility but not necessary
If the attendance at the exhibit had been low, the museum would have gone bankrupt and closed permanently, - a fact given to support the conclusion

Conclusion - The museum could not have remained open had it not been for the coverage from the local media.

The conclusion is that without coverage, the museum would have closed. But it is a possibility that the coverage contributed to record breaking attendance. It leaves open the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn record attendance even without media coverage.

So criticism of the argument is:

(D) fails to address the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors to prevent bankruptcy even without media coverage

We cannot conclude that without coverage the museum would have closed. There is a possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors on its own.

Hence, answer (D)
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 258
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Re: Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Mar 2019, 23:56
Easy D this one..

Argument : “media coverage lead to record breaking argument.if the attendance low then museum closes.So coverage lead to museum being open”.

What if without coverage(record breaking)audience still shows up just enough to run the museum.

So D)

Clear Delink in the argument between record breaking numbers and numbers just enough to put it afloat.

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Posts: 15
Location: India
GPA: 4
Re: Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Mar 2019, 01:03
D. He gave all the credit to media coverage. The argument was media coverage-> more visitors-> museum will remain open.

It can be weaken by either proving
-more visitors leead to increased coverage
Or proving
-something else also caused increased visitors.
Statement D focuses on the later statement.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 19 Mar 2018
Posts: 65
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q42 V31
GPA: 4
WE: Operations (Energy and Utilities)
CAT Tests
Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Mar 2019, 06:44
VeritasKarishma wrote:
Gladiator59 wrote:
Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered by the local media, and this coverage seems to have contributed to the record-breaking attendance it drew. If the attendance at the exhibit had been low, the museum would have gone bankrupt and closed permanently, so the museum could not have remained open had it not been for the coverage from the local media.

The reasoning in the trustee’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument


(A) confuses a necessary condition for the museum’s remaining open with a sufficient condition for the museum’s remaining open

(B) takes for granted that no previous exhibit at the museum had received such extensive media coverage

(C) takes for granted that most people who read articles about the exhibit also attended the exhibit

(D) fails to address the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors to prevent bankruptcy even without media coverage

(E) presupposes the very conclusion that it is trying to prove


The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered by the local media, - a fact given to support the conclusion
and this coverage seems to have contributed to the record-breaking attendance it drew - not sure. "seems to have" conveys possibility but not necessary
If the attendance at the exhibit had been low, the museum would have gone bankrupt and closed permanently, - a fact given to support the conclusion

Conclusion - The museum could not have remained open had it not been for the coverage from the local media.

The conclusion is that without coverage, the museum would have closed. But it is a possibility that the coverage contributed to record breaking attendance. It leaves open the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn record attendance even without media coverage.

So criticism of the argument is:

(D) fails to address the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors to prevent bankruptcy even without media coverage

We cannot conclude that without coverage the museum would have closed. There is a possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors on its own.

Hence, answer (D)


VeritasKarishma

Why can’t the answer be C?

I think C states that the author takes for granted that - because of media coverage people came to know about the exhibit and most of those people, who read the articles about the exhibit, also attended the exhibit.
Meaning- the author takes for granted that media hike brought the exhibit into limelight and most of the people after reading the articles attended the exhibit.
I also thought that D is correct but changed my mind at the last moment. Can you please explain why you eliminated C.

Thanks in advance :)

Posted from my mobile device
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 747
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Mar 2019, 02:10
Hi NRJ11090, Karishma ma'am is very busy and it would make more sense to reply to her AMA thread to get a faster response.

Anyways, the way I look at why C (and if you look closely even E for that matter) is wrong is - correlation implies causation. What if the reason why the exhibit is publicized in the media is also the reason why it is so popular? For example - what if there is a pop music band that is also performing there and hence media & the crowd are both crowding to report it? Would it still make sense to say that the crowd was "due to the fact that media reported the exhibit"? This is precisely what Option (D) states.

Hope this helps.

NRJ11090 wrote:
VeritasKarishma wrote:
Gladiator59 wrote:
Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered by the local media, and this coverage seems to have contributed to the record-breaking attendance it drew. If the attendance at the exhibit had been low, the museum would have gone bankrupt and closed permanently, so the museum could not have remained open had it not been for the coverage from the local media.

The reasoning in the trustee’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument


(A) confuses a necessary condition for the museum’s remaining open with a sufficient condition for the museum’s remaining open

(B) takes for granted that no previous exhibit at the museum had received such extensive media coverage

(C) takes for granted that most people who read articles about the exhibit also attended the exhibit

(D) fails to address the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors to prevent bankruptcy even without media coverage

(E) presupposes the very conclusion that it is trying to prove


The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered by the local media, - a fact given to support the conclusion
and this coverage seems to have contributed to the record-breaking attendance it drew - not sure. "seems to have" conveys possibility but not necessary
If the attendance at the exhibit had been low, the museum would have gone bankrupt and closed permanently, - a fact given to support the conclusion

Conclusion - The museum could not have remained open had it not been for the coverage from the local media.

The conclusion is that without coverage, the museum would have closed. But it is a possibility that the coverage contributed to record breaking attendance. It leaves open the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn record attendance even without media coverage.

So criticism of the argument is:

(D) fails to address the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors to prevent bankruptcy even without media coverage

We cannot conclude that without coverage the museum would have closed. There is a possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors on its own.

Hence, answer (D)


VeritasKarishma

Why can’t the answer be C?

I think C states that the author takes for granted that - because of media coverage people came to know about the exhibit and most of those people, who read the articles about the exhibit, also attended the exhibit.
Meaning- the author takes for granted that media hike brought the exhibit into limelight and most of the people after reading the articles attended the exhibit.
I also thought that D is correct but changed my mind at the last moment. Can you please explain why you eliminated C.

Thanks in advance :)

Posted from my mobile device

_________________

Regards,
Gladi



“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
D
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9007
Location: Pune, India
Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Mar 2019, 05:06
1
NRJ11090 wrote:
VeritasKarishma wrote:
Gladiator59 wrote:
Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered by the local media, and this coverage seems to have contributed to the record-breaking attendance it drew. If the attendance at the exhibit had been low, the museum would have gone bankrupt and closed permanently, so the museum could not have remained open had it not been for the coverage from the local media.

The reasoning in the trustee’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument


(A) confuses a necessary condition for the museum’s remaining open with a sufficient condition for the museum’s remaining open

(B) takes for granted that no previous exhibit at the museum had received such extensive media coverage

(C) takes for granted that most people who read articles about the exhibit also attended the exhibit

(D) fails to address the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors to prevent bankruptcy even without media coverage

(E) presupposes the very conclusion that it is trying to prove


The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered by the local media, - a fact given to support the conclusion
and this coverage seems to have contributed to the record-breaking attendance it drew - not sure. "seems to have" conveys possibility but not necessary
If the attendance at the exhibit had been low, the museum would have gone bankrupt and closed permanently, - a fact given to support the conclusion

Conclusion - The museum could not have remained open had it not been for the coverage from the local media.

The conclusion is that without coverage, the museum would have closed. But it is a possibility that the coverage contributed to record breaking attendance. It leaves open the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn record attendance even without media coverage.

So criticism of the argument is:

(D) fails to address the possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors to prevent bankruptcy even without media coverage

We cannot conclude that without coverage the museum would have closed. There is a possibility that the exhibit would have drawn enough visitors on its own.

Hence, answer (D)


VeritasKarishma

Why can’t the answer be C?

I think C states that the author takes for granted that - because of media coverage people came to know about the exhibit and most of those people, who read the articles about the exhibit, also attended the exhibit.
Meaning- the author takes for granted that media hike brought the exhibit into limelight and most of the people after reading the articles attended the exhibit.
I also thought that D is correct but changed my mind at the last moment. Can you please explain why you eliminated C.

Thanks in advance :)

Posted from my mobile device


The argument does not take for granted that "most people who read, attended".
"Most" implies more than 50%. The argument does not take for granted that more than 50% people who read about the exhibit, attended it. It is quite possible that only 10% who read, attended but that 10% was enough to give a record breaking attendance.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

GMAT Club Bot
Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered   [#permalink] 07 Mar 2019, 05:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Trustee: The recent exhibit at the art museum was extensively covered

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.