GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Oct 2019, 08:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 15
GMAT Date: 09-12-2013
GMAT ToolKit User
Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 02 Jul 2018, 23:06
1
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

76% (01:29) correct 24% (01:31) wrong based on 193 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress, the government's argument centered on what many legal experts consider a main-stream interpretation of the Bill of Rights.


A) the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress

B) the argument from the petitioner, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress

C) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress

D) the petitioner's argument, whose case rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress

E) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress

_________________
If KUDOS then gmatclub Test series.
YEAH!!

Originally posted by SmokedRing on 30 Aug 2013, 14:37.
Last edited by Bunuel on 02 Jul 2018, 23:06, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 15
GMAT Date: 09-12-2013
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2013, 14:43
Within seconds I narrowed down to C and E.
but I took over two and half minutes debating with myself over the use of ONLY.

I chose the wrong answer E because i thought to show contrast(Sentence starts with Unlike) between 'many legal experts' and Congress, ONLY should modify congress.
* this is similar to OG ques? -- Diabetes, ...., ranks....only yo heart diseases.*
_________________
If KUDOS then gmatclub Test series.
YEAH!!
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 703
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2013, 14:50
1
SmokedRing wrote:
Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress, the government's argument centered on what many legal experts consider a main-stream interpretation of the Bill of Rights.
A) the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress
B) the argument from the petitioner, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress
C) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress
D) the petitioner's argument, whose case rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress
E) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress


like /unlike ==>always followed by noun or noun phrase.
like/unlike x , y ==>x and y should be parallel.

now in this question Y = the government's argument.
therefore X cant be team of lawyers ..therefore A is wrong.

B) the argument from the petitioner, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress
WRONG.
the petioner,s argument is better than the argument from the petitioner

C)the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress
CORRECT

D) the petitioner's argument, whose case rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress
WRONG.
WHOSE ==>THIS HAS NO REFERENT and ARGUMENT cant be refered as WHOSE.
ONLY PASSED: meaning is wrong...=>it means that bill only passe congres....
rather actual intended meaning is that bill only RECENTLY passed.
so ONLY always modifies the word following IT.


E) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress
WRONG.
ONLY PASSED: meaning is wrong...=>it means that bill only passe congres....
rather actual intended meaning is that bill only RECENTLY passed.
so ONLY always modifies the word following IT.

_________________
When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 88
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Date: 11-06-2013
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Re: Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2013, 11:27
I wasted some seconds in understanding what "recently passed Congress" mean :lol:
So by the way what does "recently passed Congress" mean?
_________________
Do not forget to hit the Kudos button on your left if you find my post helpful 8-)

Collection of some good questions on Number System
Princeton Review Representative
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 156
Re: Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2013, 15:48
The "unlike" in this argument shows that there is a parallelism issue with what two things are "unlike" This is further compounded by the use of a descriptive phrase in between the two unlike things.

It is clear that the government's argument is unlike the petitioner's argument and since government is not underlined, this eliminates A and B for parallel comparison problems.

The next clear error is a pronoun error - the sentence gives you the option of "which" or "whose" whose is appropriate for people, not for arguments therefore D is eliminated for a bad pronoun.

The decision between C and E comes down to the placement of "only" This is a tricky adverb because it is very specific in what it modifies. in C it clearly modifies recently implying that up until recently it had not passed congress.

in E) it modifies passed - which means it only passed Congress (implying that there are other things it could have passed) To preserve the meaning of the sentence you would pick C as the correct answer.
_________________
Special offer! Save $250 on GMAT Ultimate Classroom, GMAT Small Group Instruction, or GMAT Liveonline when you use the promo code GCVERBAL250. Or, save $150 on GMAT Self-Prep when you use the code GCVERBAL150. Enroll at www.princetonreview.com
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5928
Re: Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Feb 2019, 10:52
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument   [#permalink] 16 Feb 2019, 10:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne