OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONgeneris
Project SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
For SC butler Questions Click Here Unlike the United Kingdom, where the party that wins a majority of seats in Parliament chooses the head of the government, the chief executive in the United States is chosen in an election separate from that which determines the majority party in the legislative branch.
A) Unlike the
United Kingdom, where the party that wins a majority of seats in Parliament chooses the head of the government,
the chief executive in the United States
B) Unlike
the United Kingdom party that wins a majority of seats in Parliament and chooses the head of the government,
the chief executive in the United States
C) Unlike
that of the United Kingdom, where the party that wins a majority of seats in Parliament chooses the head of the government,
the United States has a chief executive that
D) In comparison with
the United Kingdom, where the party that wins a majority of seats in Parliament chooses the head of the government,
the chief executive in the United States
E) In the United Kingdom, the party that wins a majority of seats in Parliament chooses the head of the government, but in the United States the chief executive
Because the underlined portion of the sentence contains the comparison word
unlike, check to see whether the items compared are alike.
In option A,
United Kingdom is incorrectly compared to
chief executive.
This is a comparison error, so eliminate choice A and look for any obvious repeaters.
Choice D is an obvious repeater because it also compares
United Kingdom and
chief executive, so eliminate choice D.
Now evaluate the remaining answer choices individually, looking for reasons to eliminate each.
Choice B incorrectly compares
United Kingdom party with
chief executive, so eliminate choice B.
Choice C incorrectly compares
that of the United Kingdom with
the United States, and it is unclear what the pronoun
that refers to, so eliminate choice C.
Choice E eliminates the comparison error in the original sentence by rewriting the sentence correctly to compare
in the United Kingdom to
in the United States. Nor does option E contain any new errors.
Keep choice E.
Thus—
Choice A:
No. United Kingdom is incorrectly compared to
chief executive.
Choice B:
No.
United Kingdom Party is incorrectly compared to
chief executive.
Choice C:
No. That of the United Kingdom is incorrectly compared to
United States.Choice D:
No.
United Kingdom is incorrectly compared to
chief executive. Choice E: Correct.COMMENTSShikhar22 , you wrote:
Quote:
E. seems the most reasonable choice, but the placement of the comma before 'the party that wins' does make the sentence not-so-perfect imo. Is that comma necessary?
I am glad that you asked the question, though I must give you more than one answer.
The first general disclaimer is that we are looking for the best of five answers, not for the perfect answer.
The second disclaimer is that on the GMAT, do not eliminate answer based on comma usage.
Comma usage informs two particular scenarios: lists that require an Oxford comma and comma splices (two clauses stuck together with nothing more than a comma).
In the first case, the presence of a comma might signal that you face a somewhat unusual list: such as
A, B and C, and D, as well as E.
In the second case (a comma splice), the comma that incorrectly sutures two independent clauses together actually signals a construction error in which a conjunction is missing.
In general, your position probably carries the day, though with comparisons and place names, things get more complicated.
A prepositional phrase of fewer than five words such as
In the United Kingdom is generally not set off by a comma.
On the other hand, in formal prose, we often see commas after intro prepositional phrases that involve dates or places.
I have written and edited just about every kind of prose.
In journalism, to save space and to keep my editor from yelling at me about space, I would leave out the comma.
In a high end journal, I would probably keep the comma, in order to highlight the comparison of the two countries.
When I place a comma after a place name, I emphasize that I am focused on the place.
On the GMAT? If I were writing the question,
I would probably leave the comma in, but there is a good argument to remove it, too.
In short, there is no absolutely right answer to your question.
Option E is not made worse by the comma, in my opinion. You see the matter differently.
Both perspectives are valid.
The OWL-Purdue Writing Lab (a great resource) discusses the usage of commas
here.
At any rate, I am glad to see you and the other posters engaged with the material.
Well done.