GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Oct 2019, 06:48

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

MBA Section Director
Affiliations: GMATClub
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 2594
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Aug 2018, 10:03
1
8
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (02:06) correct 47% (01:50) wrong based on 136 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?

A. It will be easier to carry a portable defibrillator than a regular defibrillator outdoors.

B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent.

C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries.

D. Bulky defibrillators were provided at free of charge to patients who are at risk for tachycardia.

E. The defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators uses the same mechanism to cure tachycardia as bulky defibrillator does.

_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2017
Posts: 253
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Aug 2018, 10:28
workout wrote:
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?

A. It will be easier to carry a portable defibrillator than a regular defibrillator outdoors.

B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent.

C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries.

D. Bulky defibrillators were provided at free of charge to patients who are at risk for tachycardia.

E. The defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators uses the same mechanism to cure tachycardia as bulky defibrillator does.
Will go for B

conclusion - - > deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.---> it means somehow the new defibrillator will be accessible to those group that suffered maximum deaths because of unavailabiliry

A--> does not matter if it is portable or not
C---> citing an advantage is irrelevant
D---> we are conserned with portable defrib now
E---> out of scope.

Consider kudos if that helped

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________
Thank you =Kudos
The best thing in life lies on the other side of the pain.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2017
Posts: 298
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Aug 2018, 11:06
+1 for C

A - Incorrect. The word 'Portable' means it would be easier to carry. Hence this doesn't strengthen

B - Incorrect. Patient's age is not mentioned in the argument. Hence, this is not relevant.

C - Correct. The use of defribillators would be maximum only when it can be accessed from anywhere. The deaths increased as it was not accessible earlier. This statement tells us that they dont require a stable power source and they can be accessed from anywhere using batteries.

D - Incorrect. The charge of defribillators is unnecessary.

E - Incorrect. Even if the portable defribillator didn't use the old tech. It can use the new tech to cure.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________
Only those who risk going too far, can possibly find out how far one can go
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2017
Posts: 253
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Aug 2018, 11:27
Akash720 wrote:
+1 for C

A - Incorrect. The word 'Portable' means it would be easier to carry. Hence this doesn't strengthen

B - Incorrect. Patient's age is not mentioned in the argument. Hence, this is not relevant.

C - Correct. The use of defribillators would be maximum only when it can be accessed from anywhere. The deaths increased as it was not accessible earlier. This statement tells us that they dont require a stable power source and they can be accessed from anywhere using batteries.

D - Incorrect. The charge of defribillators is unnecessary.

E - Incorrect. Even if the portable defribillator didn't use the old tech. It can use the new tech to cure.

Posted from my mobile device
Hey Akash,

In option C, you mentioned that deaths were more because they were not accessible. I think not accessible means people could not get access to the device. I don't think no access to device will be attributed to the non - availability of electricity.

Consider kudos if that helped.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________
Thank you =Kudos
The best thing in life lies on the other side of the pain.
Director
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Posts: 762
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Aug 2018, 13:27
workout wrote:
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?

A. It will be easier to carry a portable defibrillator than a regular defibrillator outdoors.

B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent.

C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries.

D. Bulky defibrillators were provided at free of charge to patients who are at risk for tachycardia.

E. The defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators uses the same mechanism to cure tachycardia as bulky defibrillator does.

Conclusion
deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future

Imo -

D and E are out.
D strengthens the case of Bulky defibrillators
In E , we are not too bothered about the mechanism as long as we get the results.
B for me narrows down the the scope to patients over 50 and unexpected onset of tachycardia .
Unexpected is ok , but what about the Access for those with known risk
A is pretty solid , but again we know it is easy to carry the the new one outdoors probably a limiting factor , for now lets not leave this one out.
C mentions a huge advantage of new Defibrillators over the old ones. Running on batteries definitely improves the availability of the device

C Imo should be the answer.
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2016
Posts: 183
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.84
WE: Operations (Consulting)
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 26 Aug 2018, 04:16
2
I would have gone for E here.
Assumption is that portable ones are as good as bulky ones.
E supports that assumption.

A-Carry? What? Why? Out of scope for me.
C-why is battery power so important? Out of scope.!!
B-Over 50? Insurance? Nothing related to that in the assumption. It doesn't support anything.
D-So? Does nothing for the argument.

Awaiting the OA. Please let me know if I overlooked anything.

Originally posted by Mick1005 on 25 Aug 2018, 15:20.
Last edited by Mick1005 on 26 Aug 2018, 04:16, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Status: On the journey of achieving
Affiliations: Senior Manager, CA by profession, CFA(USA) Level 2
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Posts: 202
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V21
GPA: 3.82
WE: Other (Commercial Banking)
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Aug 2018, 03:16
sumit411 wrote:
workout wrote:
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?

A. It will be easier to carry a portable defibrillator than a regular defibrillator outdoors.

B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent.

C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries.

D. Bulky defibrillators were provided at free of charge to patients who are at risk for tachycardia.

E. The defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators uses the same mechanism to cure tachycardia as bulky defibrillator does.
Will go for B

conclusion - - > deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.---> it means somehow the new defibrillator will be accessible to those group that suffered maximum deaths because of unavailabiliry

A--> does not matter if it is portable or not
C---> citing an advantage is irrelevant
D---> we are conserned with portable defrib now
E---> out of scope.

Consider kudos if that helped

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Option B narrows down the scope to patients over the age of 50.....What about those with known risks?

Option C is apt
_________________
Never Settle for something less than what you deserve...........

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan
Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously
Wont give up till i hit a 700+
Manager
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 226
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Aug 2018, 03:35
I think the ans should be b, because the conclusion is relevant to the group that has no access to the device. We can strengthen the conclusion by stating that this group will indeed get the new device

Posted from my mobile device
Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 543
Location: France
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Aug 2018, 03:38
2
CounterSniper wrote:
workout wrote:
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?

A. It will be easier to carry a portable defibrillator than a regular defibrillator outdoors.

B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent.

C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries.

D. Bulky defibrillators were provided at free of charge to patients who are at risk for tachycardia.

E. The defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators uses the same mechanism to cure tachycardia as bulky defibrillator does.

Conclusion
deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future

Imo -

D and E are out.
D strengthens the case of Bulky defibrillators
In E , we are not too bothered about the mechanism as long as we get the results.
B for me narrows down the the scope to patients over 50 and unexpected onset of tachycardia .
Unexpected is ok , but what about the Access for those with known risk
A is pretty solid , but again we know it is easy to carry the the new one outdoors probably a limiting factor , for now lets not leave this one out.
C mentions a huge advantage of new Defibrillators over the old ones. Running on batteries definitely improves the availability of the device

C Imo should be the answer.

CounterSniper, Akash720, Micky1005, vasuca10

My 2 cents :

Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.

so people not having tachycardia risk will not be getting access to defibrillators.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?

B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent.

Here answer choice states that - unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent in patients over 50 - so this group will not get access to defibrillators.

Hence possibility of deaths due to non-accessibility of defibrillators in this group.

However, as per answer choice - Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price - to this group of people.

This can help in reducing the number of deaths.

IMO - B - supports the author’s claim.

Let's analyse choice C :

C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries.

Actual argument statement never links number of deaths to stability of power source.

Let's wait for OA.
_________________
Everything will fall into place…

There is perfect timing for
everything and everyone.
Never doubt, But Work on
improving yourself,
Keep the faith and
It will all make sense.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2017
Posts: 253
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Aug 2018, 04:03
vasuca10 wrote:
sumit411 wrote:
workout wrote:
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?

A. It will be easier to carry a portable defibrillator than a regular defibrillator outdoors.

B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent.

C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries.

D. Bulky defibrillators were provided at free of charge to patients who are at risk for tachycardia.

E. The defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators uses the same mechanism to cure tachycardia as bulky defibrillator does.
Will go for B

conclusion - - > deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.---> it means somehow the new defibrillator will be accessible to those group that suffered maximum deaths because of unavailabiliry

A--> does not matter if it is portable or not
C---> citing an advantage is irrelevant
D---> we are conserned with portable defrib now
E---> out of scope.

Consider kudos if that helped

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Option B narrows down the scope to patients over the age of 50.....What about those with known risks?

Option C is apt
Are we not considered about the people who die unexpectedly from the disease.

Please check out explanation by Harsh.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________
Thank you =Kudos
The best thing in life lies on the other side of the pain.
Director
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Posts: 762
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 26 Aug 2018, 05:48
Harshgmat wrote:
CounterSniper wrote:
workout wrote:
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?

A. It will be easier to carry a portable defibrillator than a regular defibrillator outdoors.

B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent.

C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries.

D. Bulky defibrillators were provided at free of charge to patients who are at risk for tachycardia.

E. The defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators uses the same mechanism to cure tachycardia as bulky defibrillator does.

Conclusion
deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future

Imo -

D and E are out.
D strengthens the case of Bulky defibrillators
In E , we are not too bothered about the mechanism as long as we get the results.
B for me narrows down the the scope to patients over 50 and unexpected onset of tachycardia .
Unexpected is ok , but what about the Access for those with known risk
A is pretty solid , but again we know it is easy to carry the the new one outdoors probably a limiting factor , for now lets not leave this one out.
C mentions a huge advantage of new Defibrillators over the old ones. Running on batteries definitely improves the availability of the device

C Imo should be the answer.

CounterSniper, Akash720, Micky1005, vasuca10

My 2 cents :

Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.

so people not having tachycardia risk will not be getting access to defibrillators.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?

B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent.

Here answer choice states that - unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent in patients over 50 - so this group will not get access to defibrillators.

Hence possibility of deaths due to non-accessibility of defibrillators in this group.

However, as per answer choice - Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price - to this group of people.

This can help in reducing the number of deaths.

IMO - B - supports the author’s claim.

Let's analyse choice C :

C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries.

Actual argument statement never links number of deaths to stability of power source.

Let's wait for OA.

My bad... in spite of reading the stem twice I missed the red part that you have underlined, should be b. We are indeed dealing with people who are not among the known cases +1 kudos

Posted from my mobile device

Originally posted by CounterSniper on 26 Aug 2018, 05:43.
Last edited by CounterSniper on 26 Aug 2018, 05:48, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Status: On the journey of achieving
Affiliations: Senior Manager, CA by profession, CFA(USA) Level 2
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Posts: 202
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V21
GPA: 3.82
WE: Other (Commercial Banking)
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Aug 2018, 05:44
_________________
Never Settle for something less than what you deserve...........

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan
Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously
Wont give up till i hit a 700+
Manager
Status: On the journey of achieving
Affiliations: Senior Manager, CA by profession, CFA(USA) Level 2
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Posts: 202
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V21
GPA: 3.82
WE: Other (Commercial Banking)
Re: Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Aug 2018, 05:52
Hii Harshgmat I am clear with your explanation..... It must be Option B
Deaths are nowwhere linked with stability of power source. Hence Option C is out of picture.
_________________
Never Settle for something less than what you deserve...........

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan
Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously
Wont give up till i hit a 700+
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 776
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Aug 2018, 09:54
2
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.

We are told that only some can have defibrillators because insurance will only cover so many. We can infer that cost is because of this. So if more people have access, odds are more will live. But this would have to mean the unit is cheaper and/or that insurance is covering it.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?

A. It will be easier to carry a portable defibrillator than a regular defibrillator outdoors. -- Who cares? We are never told anything about location. We are told about its size, but not its ability to be moved

B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent. -- This fits our pre-thinking. If it is cheaper and more are provided, less people will die.

C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries. -- Who cares about power? We are never told about the need for it to be plugged in, so this is wrong.

D. Bulky defibrillators were provided at free of charge to patients who are at risk for tachycardia. -- OK, so the old defibrillators were given away to those who needed it for free. Does this strengthen our conclusion? Nope. How would a newer version save more lives? We would have to make too many assumptions beyond this to make it work.

E. The defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators uses the same mechanism to cure tachycardia as bulky defibrillator does. -- Who cares? What if they used the different mechanisms but were still equally effective? This cannot be our answer because it does not matter
_________________
D-Day: November 18th, 2017

My CR Guide: Here

My RC Guide: Here

Want to be a moderator? We may want you to be one! See how: Here
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible   [#permalink] 26 Aug 2018, 09:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by