GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Dec 2018, 05:50

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     December 15, 2018

     December 15, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
  • $450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

     December 15, 2018

     December 15, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Get the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299)

Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1324
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2017, 21:50
5
1
28
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:28) correct 32% (02:00) wrong based on 1622 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review 2018

Practice Question
Question No.: CR 173
Page:

Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property taxes in that city tend to rise. This is because there are then fewer residents paying to maintain an infrastructure that was designed to support more people. Rising property taxes, in turn, drive more residents away, compounding the problem. Since the city of Stonebridge is starting to lose population, the city government should therefore refrain from raising property taxes.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the urban planner's argument?

(A) If Stonebridge does not raise taxes on its residents to maintain its infrastructure, the city will become much less attractive to live in as that infrastructure decays.

(B) Stonebridge at present benefits from grants provided by the national government to help maintain certain parts of its infrastructure.

(C) If there is a small increase in property taxes in Stonebridge and a slightly larger proportion of total revenue than at present is allocated to infrastructure maintenance, the funding will be adequate for that purpose.

(D) Demographers project that the population of a region that includes Stonebridge will start to increase substantially within the next several years.

(E) The property taxes in Stonebridge are significantly lower than those in many larger cities.

_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

Most Helpful Expert Reply
Target Test Prep Representative
User avatar
P
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 4295
Location: United States (CA)
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Nov 2017, 16:12
7
hazelnut wrote:

Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property taxes in that city tend to rise. This is because there are then fewer residents paying to maintain an infrastructure that was designed to support more people. Rising property taxes, in turn, drive more residents away, compounding the problem. Since the city of Stonebridge is starting to lose population, the city government should therefore refrain from raising property taxes.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the urban planner's argument?

(A) If Stonebridge does not raise taxes on its residents to maintain its infrastructure, the city will become much less attractive to live in as that infrastructure decays.
(B) Stonebridge at present benefits from grants provided by the national government to help maintain certain parts of its infrastructure.
(C) If there is a small increase in property taxes in Stonebridge and a slightly larger proportion of total revenue than at present is allocated to infrastructure maintenance, the funding will be adequate for that purpose.
(D) Demographers project that the population of a region that includes Stonebridge will start to increase substantially within the next several years.
(E) The property taxes in Stonebridge are significantly lower than those in many larger cities.


To weaken an argument, you have to be clear regarding what the conclusion of that argument is. The conclusion of this argument is that the city government of Stonebridge should refrain from raising property taxes.

Thus, to weaken the argument, we need a choice that shows that even though tax increases can result in a compounding of a city’s issues related to outmigration, the conclusion that Stonebridge should refrain from raising tax rates does not necessarily follow from the premises.

(A) If Stonebridge does not raise taxes on its residents to maintain its infrastructure, the city will become much less attractive to live in as that infrastructure decays.

While this choice does not counter the idea that raising tax rates could drive people to move away from Stonebridge, it does indicate that refraining from raising rates would lead to a situation in which the attractiveness of living in Stonebridge would be decreased. A decrease in attractiveness of living in Stonebridge could influence people to move away as much as or even more than an increase in taxes would.

Therefore, as it provides a reason to question the idea that refraining from raising tax rates is the way to minimize outmigration from Stonebridge, while this choice does not destroy the argument, it does provide a reason to call the conclusion of the argument into question, and thus this choice is our weakener.

(B) Stonebridge at present benefits from grants provided by the national government to help maintain certain parts of its infrastructure.

This choice provides some indication that Stonebridge can maintain certain parts of its infrastructure without raising tax rates. However, the conclusion of the argument is not that Stonebridge needs to raise tax rates. The conclusion is that raising taxes will have a particular effect. Therefore, this choice does not affect the argument.

(C) If there is a small increase in property taxes in Stonebridge and a slightly larger proportion of total revenue than at present is allocated to infrastructure maintenance, the funding will be adequate for that purpose.

A small tax increase is still a tax increase. Thus, it could still result in people moving away from Stonebridge. Therefore, this choice does not affect the dynamic that the argument uses as evidence supporting the conclusion.

(D) Demographers project that the population of a region that includes Stonebridge will start to increase substantially within the next several years.

The fact that population of the region in which Stonebridge is located will “start to increase… within the next several years” does not clearly counter the idea that by raising tax rates Stonebridge will influence people to move away because:

- the projected population increase may not occur until some years have passed.
- it is not clear that a regional population increase will counteract the effects on Stonebridge’s population of a property tax rate increase.

Therefore, this choice does not clearly weaken the argument.

(E) The property taxes in Stonebridge are significantly lower than those in many larger cities.


This choice seems to present a fact that weakens the conclusion. The fact that property taxes in Stonebridge are significantly lower than those in many larger cities could be perceived as giving Stonebridge room to raise property tax rates without triggering further outmigration, because even if the government of Stonebridge were to increase the tax rates, the rates could still be lower than or equal to the rates of other cities.

However, there are two aspects of this choice that make it such that it does not effectively weaken the argument.

The first aspect is the use of the expression “many … cities.” That Stonebridge’s tax rates are lower than those of many cities does not mean that they are lower than those of all cities or even that they are lower than those of the majority of cities. The “many cities” with higher rates could be a small percentage of the set of all cities.

The second aspect is that regardless of whether Stonebridge’s tax rates are lower than those of other cities, increasing Stonebridge’s rates would make living in Stonebridge less attractive than it is when rates are lower.

Therefore, this choice does not undermine the idea that by increasing tax rates, Stonebridge would influence people to move away.

The correct answer is A.
_________________

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO

GMAT Quant Self-Study Course
500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions

Most Helpful Community Reply
SC Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1687
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 4
WE: Analyst (Retail)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2017, 22:03
3
2
Question Type: Weakener

Main Point: Increase in property tax --> People migrate --> So property tax should not be increased.

(A) If Stonebridge does not raise taxes on its residents to maintain its infrastructure, the city will become much less attractive to live in as that infrastructure decays. - Correct. If taxes are not raised, infrastructure decays and people will migrate. So property tax should be increased.

(B) Stonebridge at present benefits from grants provided by the national government to help maintain certain parts of its infrastructure. - Incorrect. Irrelevant.

(C) If there is a small increase in property taxes in Stonebridge and a slightly larger proportion of total revenue than at present is allocated to infrastructure maintenance, the funding will be adequate for that purpose. - Incorrect. Out of scope. We do not know whether a larger proportion of total revenue can be allocated for infrastructure maintainance.

(D) Demographers project that the population of a region that includes Stonebridge will start to increase substantially within the next several years. - Incorrect. Irrelevant.

(E) The property taxes in Stonebridge are significantly lower than those in many larger cities. - Incorrect. Even if the taxes are lower, any increase in taxes may cause the people to migrate.

Answer: A
General Discussion
Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 634
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jul 2017, 09:18
carcass wrote:
Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property taxes in that city tend to rise. This is because there are then fewer residents paying to maintain an infrastructure that was designed to support more people. Rising property taxes, in turn, drive more residents away, compounding the problem. Since the city of Stonebridge is starting to lose population, the city government should therefore refrain from raising property taxes.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the urban planner's argument?

A. If Stonebridge does not raise taxes on its residents to maintain its infrastructure, the city will become much less attractive to live in as that infrastructure decays.

B. Stonebridge at present benefits from grants provided by the national government to help maintain certain parts of its infrastructure.

C. If there is a small increase in property taxes in Stonebridge and a slightly larger proportion of total revenue than at present is allocated to infrastructure maintenance, the funding will be adequate for that purpose.

D. Demographers project that the population of a region that includes Stonebridge will start to increase substantially within the next several years.

E. The property taxes in Stonebridge are significantly lower than those in many larger cities.


will go with A ..
A-- it shows if the city wont inc. taxes, it might further lose population ..
B--grants(kind of fixed amount) are already there ..it is not depending on migration of people...
C-talking about increase in taxes , it can cause further migration ..
D-it talks about future..
E-it does not mean that people will not migrate to other area, where taxes are low.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 244
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2017, 04:16
Cause-Efffect type:
Rise in taxes leads to population migration. In order to prevent the population decrease the country X decided not to raise taxes.
Task:
Need to find a valid reason for country X to increase tax in order to maintain current population level.

A. If taxes are not increased then country X will have to decrease investments and thus will be unable to retain its infrustructure at decent level. Correct.
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1066
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2017, 06:58
hazelnut wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review 2018

Practice Question
Question No.: CR 173
Page:

Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property taxes in that city tend to rise. This is because there are then fewer residents paying to maintain an infrastructure that was designed to support more people. Rising property taxes, in turn, drive more residents away, compounding the problem. Since the city of Stonebridge is starting to lose population, the city government should therefore refrain from raising property taxes.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the urban planner's argument?

(A) If Stonebridge does not raise taxes on its residents to maintain its infrastructure, the city will become much less attractive to live in as that infrastructure decays.
(B) Stonebridge at present benefits from grants provided by the national government to help maintain certain parts of its infrastructure.
(C) If there is a small increase in property taxes in Stonebridge and a slightly larger proportion of total revenue than at present is allocated to infrastructure maintenance, the funding will be adequate for that purpose.
(D) Demographers project that the population of a region that includes Stonebridge will start to increase substantially within the next several years.
(E) The property taxes in Stonebridge are significantly lower than those in many larger cities.


Premise 1: When a city loses population due to migration, property taxes in that city tend to rise.
Premise 2: This is because there are then fewer residents paying to maintain an infrastructure that was designed to support more people.
Premise 3: Rising property taxes, in turn, drive more residents away, compounding the problem.

Conclusion: Since the city of Stonebridge is starting to lose population, the city government should therefore refrain from raising property taxes.

Assumption : It is assuming that the city will continue to remain good and therefore taxes should not be increased .

Now lets get on with our answer
If suppose the taxes are not increased then the infrastructure of the city will become abysmal and no new population would want to come to the city to live .
So the taxes has to be increased
Only A can be deduced from the argument .


Option C is a trap as it is a consequence of increasing the tax
es
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my answers useful

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Jun 2016
Posts: 73
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2017, 11:07
1
Experts, @gmatninja

Why is option B incorrect ?

Would option B be correct if it did not mention "certain" parts of the infra and entire infra

Thanks
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Posts: 17
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2017, 11:47
Even i had selected option 'b' as answer. Someone please tell me why is option 'b' incorrect.
Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 21 Jun 2014
Posts: 1096
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2017, 10:38
2
Hi,

kunal1608

Quote:
Experts, GMATNinja

Why is option B incorrect ?

Would option B be correct if it did not mention "certain" parts of the infra and entire infra

Thanks

kartzcool

Quote:
Even i had selected option 'b' as answer. Someone please tell me why is option 'b' incorrect.

grants - it does not mean ALL the amount required for ALL the infrastructure maintenance is given to city by the NATIONAL GOVT.
certain parts - yes, there could be various other parts that would need dollars.

consider the scenario. if $100k is the grant and city spend $200k overall per year then city still needs $100K. right? That we the people pay as tax to city. As people leave, city govt needs to increase tax to generate the sum of $100K.

If they do not increase tax then less money available to infrastructure. This would make infrastructure keep on getting a bad shape. who wants to be in bad infrastructure. BUT then who wants to pay higher taxes. so its not good to either increase tax or let the infrastructure go dead. overall, its a bad plan to not increase tax because that will not stop people from going for the reason of bad infrastructure.

choice B does not say all this. it just says hey - some amount and some areas are covered by government. But what about the rest of the areas and rest of the amount. Choice B traps you talking about infrastructure & grant, so that it does not look irrelevant. this choice could be correct if it talked about INCREASE IN GRANT is expected or something like that.
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Target - 720-740
Project PS Butler - https://gmatclub.com/forum/project-ps-butler-practice-everyday-280904.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/information-on-new-gmat-esr-report-beta-221111.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/list-of-one-year-full-time-mba-programs-222103.html

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1223
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2017, 12:16
Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property taxes in that city tend to rise. This is because there are then fewer residents paying to maintain an infrastructure that was designed to support more people. Rising property taxes, in turn, drive more residents away, compounding the problem. Since the city of Stonebridge is starting to lose population, the city government should therefore refrain from raising property taxes.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the urban planner's argument?

(A) If Stonebridge does not raise taxes on its residents to maintain its infrastructure, the city will become much less attractive to live in as that infrastructure decays. -Correct. If the city becomes inhabitable then there is no point in reducing the tax.
(B) Stonebridge at present benefits from grants provided by the national government to help maintain certain parts of its infrastructure. -This strengthens the argument because if the city receives support from the government then it perhaps it could refrain from increasing the tax.
(C) If there is a small increase in property taxes in Stonebridge and a slightly larger proportion of total revenue than at present is allocated to infrastructure maintenance, the funding will be adequate for that purpose. -No purpose is discussed in the passage.
(D) Demographers project that the population of a region that includes Stonebridge will start to increase substantially within the next several years. -Several years is a long term not discussed in the passage.
(E) The property taxes in Stonebridge are significantly lower than those in many larger cities. -Out of scope
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!
Preparing for RC my way
RC Summary Activity - New Project to imporve RC Skills
Bloomberg's US Bschool Ranking

My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant | 2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation | 3. LSAT RC compilation | 4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal | 5. QOTD RC (Carcass) | 6. Challange OG RC | 7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Posts: 265
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2017, 14:25
Thanks HKD1710 and gmatexam439 for the explanations!

To post additional questions not already addressed in this thread, feel free to use the request verbal experts' reply button.
_________________

www.gmatninja.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Sep 2017
Posts: 29
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
CAT Tests
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2018, 23:55
GMATNinja
Can you pl clarify that how choice c is not a valid weakened.

The qstn stem says that when sufficient money for infrastructure is not their the government increases the tax amount. This increase in tax amount results in cascading effect which in turn results in more people leaving the town because of tax increases.
In option c, if the amount allocated for maintenance of city infrastructure is increased then the amount should be sufficient and the cascading effect can be stopped.
Since cascading effect has stopped hence people would prefer to stay with marginal tax increase.
Can someone please help how this option is incorrect

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2149
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2018, 19:32
hassu13 wrote:
GMATNinja
Can you pl clarify that how choice c is not a valid weakened.

The qstn stem says that when sufficient money for infrastructure is not their the government increases the tax amount. This increase in tax amount results in cascading effect which in turn results in more people leaving the town because of tax increases.
In option c, if the amount allocated for maintenance of city infrastructure is increased then the amount should be sufficient and the cascading effect can be stopped.
Since cascading effect has stopped hence people would prefer to stay with marginal tax increase.
Can someone please help how this option is incorrect

Posted from my mobile device

Quote:
(C) If there is a small increase in property taxes in Stonebridge and a slightly larger proportion of total revenue than at present is allocated to infrastructure maintenance, the funding will be adequate for that purpose.

Choice (C) does solve the infrastructure funding problem... but only temporarily.

Implementing the solution suggested in choice (C) gives us adequate infrastructure funding momentarily, but it also requires raising property taxes. We know that "rising property taxes... drive more residents away." So even a small increase in property taxes, as suggested in choice (C), could drive residents away. That would in turn decrease the funding available for infrastructure and cause us to raise taxes once again. That could cause even MORE residents to leave, causing us to raise taxes again, and so on and so on.

hassu13 wrote:
Since cascading effect has stopped hence people would prefer to stay with marginal tax increase.

Since we are specifically told that rising property taxes drive residents away, we cannot assume that they will decide to stay when there is a small property tax increase. On the contrary, based on the given information, it is more likely that even a small increase would drive some residents away, further compounding the problem.

I hope that helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | Instagram | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Apr 2017
Posts: 34
CAT Tests
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2018, 00:06
Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property taxes in that city tend to rise. This is because there are then fewer residents paying to maintain an infrastructure that was designed to support more people. Rising property taxes, in turn, drive more residents away, compounding the problem. Since the city of Stonebridge is starting to lose population, the city government should therefore refrain from raising property taxes.

govt should not refrain from raising property tax
given a) increase in tax driving pop away, compounding the problem.

pre-think:
icrease in tax has included the calculative loss it is going to bear due to pop losss

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the urban planner's argument?

(A) If Stonebridge does not raise taxes on its residents to maintain its infrastructure, the city will become much less attractive to live in as that infrastructure decays.
not raising-> drive ppl away, could be relevant.

(B) Stonebridge at present benefits from grants provided by the national government to help maintain certain parts of its infrastructure.
it is indicating govt should nt raise. opposite

(C) If there is a small increase in property taxes in Stonebridge and a slightly larger proportion of total revenue than at present is allocated to infrastructure maintenance, the funding will be adequate for that purpose.
slight increase in tax-> slight increase in revenue-> slight increase in investment in maintenance. doesnot address that if not icnrease, there is no problem. not conclusive

(D) Demographers project that the population of a region that includes Stonebridge will start to increase substantially within the next several years.
its talking abt future. not current scenarios. might be relevant but not for this argument.

(E) The property taxes in Stonebridge are significantly lower than those in many larger cities.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property &nbs [#permalink] 09 Oct 2018, 00:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Urban planner: When a city loses population due to migration, property

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.