ziyuen
Certain blocks of Melbourne, most notably the tiny alleyways throughout the central business district, seem to have more pubs and restaurants than
there are people.
A. there are
B. their
C. are
D. they have
E. do
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
This comparison problem begs for an apples-to-apples comparison, as the sentence compares the number of pubs/restaurants on those blocks of Melbourne to the number of people on those blocks.
Choice D makes that proper, parallel comparison. The blocks seem to have more restaurants than they (the blocks) have people.
In terms of parallel, logical comparison, choice E perhaps makes the most egregious error, comparing the number of pubs that these blocks have to the number of pubs that "people do," meaning the number that "people" have. Choice B is similar if more ambiguous - is it comparing the pubs the block has to the pubs that the block's people have?
Choice C should clearly be wrong from a logical and diction perspective. And choice A, among other problems, exhibits a significant lack of clarity. Does "there are" mean the number of people that are on those blocks? That there are in the world at large?
Choice D makes a logical, clear comparison and is therefore the correct answer.