Many corporations are scaling back their operations and focusing on

Question

Many corporations are scaling back their operations and focusing on their core businesses  so as not to be hindered by over-diversification  in the world marketplace.

A. so as not to be hindered by over-diversification

B. so that over-diversification would not hinder them

C. so that they will not have so much diversification to hinder them

D. and thereby not to be hindered by over-diversification

E. and there is not so much diversification to hinder them

NCRanjan · Answer

Many corporations are scaling back their operations and focusing on their core businesses so as not to be hindered by over-diversification in the world marketplace.

A. so as not to be hindered by over-diversification

B. so that over-diversification would not hinder them

C. so that they will not have so much diversification to hinder them

D. and thereby not to be hindered by over-diversification

E. and there is not so much diversification to hinder them

I am confused between option A and B

A. so as not to be hindered by over-diversification- Seems like a OK colloquial usage , uses a passive construction i will not commit to it

B. so that over-diversification would not hinder them- rectifies the passive construction , conveys the correct meaning , seems like the real deal. the only thing here is the usage of would which suggests that the overdiversification is expected in future and the firms want to avoid it. nothing wrong with that - KEEP THIS

C. so that they will not have so much diversification to hinder them- this suggests that firms will have over diversification in order to hinder them . I dont even know what that means.

D. and thereby not to be hindered by over-diversification- usage of And to establish some sort parallelism is wrong here . there is nothing working with and

E. and there is not so much diversification to hinder them - same as option D

I marked B .

Lets see . i will wait for the experts

sandeep211986 · Answer

A for me ,in B would is not used with reference to the past.

Posted from my mobile device

rahul6019 · Answer

A for me too. In B, usage of would is incorrect.

ArupRS · Answer

Can you please elaborate more?

Regards.
Arup

aragonn · Answer

Question Explanation 
This sentence is correct as written.

The underlined portion of the sentence contains the idiom, so as…to, so check to see if that idiom is correct. There appears to be no error in the original sentence, so keep choice A. Because there is no error in the original sentence, there are no obvious repeaters to look for, so evaluate the remaining answer choices individually looking for reasons to eliminate each.

Choice B contains a pronoun, them, which might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is a pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice B. Choice C contains two pronouns, they and them, which again might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is another pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice C. Choice D restructures the sentence to create an additional list. Are scaling and to be hindered are not parallel, so eliminate choice D. Choice E contains the pronoun them, which might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is a pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice E.

Alternatively, if it is difficult to spot the grammar rule the sentence is testing, another strategy is to identify an error from the answers by looking for either a 2/3 split or differences among the answers. Because three of the answer choices use the preposition so and two of them use the conjunction and, this difference is an indication to look for parallel construction errors.

Choice A: Correct.

Choice B: No. The pronoun them is ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

Choice C: No. The pronouns they and them are ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

Choice D: No. The verb forms are scaling and to be hindered are not parallel. Parallel construction.

Choice E: No. The pronoun them is ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

The correct answer is choice A.

NinetyFour · Answer

Reasoning:
B, C, E) Vague pronoun. Them could refer to companies or businesses 
D) And conjunction doesn't make sense. Since "Many corporations are scaling back their operations and focusing on their core businesses" results in the companies not being hindered. I think if D) removed the and the sentence would be fine since thereby means as a result

Priyanka1293 · Answer

Is it right to eliminate an answer just based on pronoun ambiguity ?

Vinodhini1803 · Answer

I had the same doubt. I felt B was a right answer. Also So as to is a wrong idiom 
So 'Adjective' to + Verb is the right one - something I read in another post.
Not sure which is right

DmitryFarberMPrep · Answer

Priyanka1293 
 Vinodhini1803

We don't want to cut a choice simply because it uses a pronoun that  could in theory  refer to more than one noun in the sentence. However, if it's legitimately unclear what the pronoun is referring to, then we can feel justified cutting the choice, and I'd argue that that's the case here.

There is also another problem with B--"would." We use "would" for hypotheticals ("If you did X, she would do Y") or as the past tense of will ("'I thought she would not do that."). A desired result does not count as a hypothetical, so "would" doesn't work here.

Vinodhini1803 · Answer

Thank you for a quick reply. 
if the sentence is "Many corporations scaled back their operation..." then is usage of would right?

DmitryFarberMPrep · Answer

Vinodhini1803 
We  could  use "would" in such a situation, but only if we had a clause that would be written as "will" in the present tense.

Watch this switch from present to past:

If you damage the truck, your parents will be mad. 
I knew that if you damaged the truck, your parents would be mad.

Here, will/would is not quite right, since we're not saying for sure that the corporations will not be hindered. We're simply explaining the motivation or goal for the companies' actions, so the construction "so as not to" works very well.

Vinodhini1803 · Answer

Got it. thanks

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Many corporations are scaling back their operations and focusing on

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

Many corporations are scaling back their operations and focusing on

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards