CounterSniper
workout
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?
A. It will be easier to carry a portable defibrillator than a regular defibrillator outdoors.
B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent.
C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries.
D. Bulky defibrillators were provided at free of charge to patients who are at risk for tachycardia.
E. The defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators uses the same mechanism to cure tachycardia as bulky defibrillator does.
Conclusion
deaths due to
lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future
Imo -
D and E are out.
D strengthens the case of Bulky defibrillators
In E , we are not too bothered about the mechanism as long as we get the results.
B for me narrows down the the scope to
patients over 50 and
unexpected onset of tachycardia .
Unexpected is ok , but what about the
Access for those with known risk A is pretty solid , but again we know it is easy to carry the the new one
outdoors probably a limiting factor , for now lets not leave this one out.
C mentions a huge advantage of new Defibrillators over the old ones. Running on batteries definitely
improves the availability of the device C Imo should be the answer.
CounterSniper,
Akash720,
Micky1005,
vasuca10My 2 cents :
Until now Cardiac defibrillators were bulky machines accessible at home through insurance only to people with a known risk of tachycardia. Consequently, a number of people
not identified at risk for tachycardia die due to lack of access to a defibrillator. Portable Defibrillators has released a small cheaper defibrillator that everyone can use. Consequently, deaths due to lack of access to the defibrillator will go down significantly in the near future.
so people not having tachycardia risk will not be getting access to defibrillators.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the author’s claim?
B. Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price to
patients over 50, the age group where unexpected onset of tachycardia is most prevalent.Here answer choice states that - unexpected onset of tachycardia is
most prevalent in patients over 50 -
so this group will not get access to defibrillators.
Hence possibility of deaths due to non-accessibility of defibrillators in this group.
However, as per answer choice - Most insurance companies are likely to provide the defibrillator from Portable Defibrillators at an affordable price - to this group of people.
This can help in reducing the number of deaths.
IMO - B - supports the author’s claim.
Let's analyse choice C :
C. Unlike bulky defibrillators, defibrillators from Portable Defibrillators do not require a stable persistent power source and can be operated using batteries.
Actual argument statement never links number of deaths to stability of power source.
Let's wait for OA.