Hi vipsgmat,The doubt that's been running through this thread (the one anurag16 raised when they argued for
B) is:
why isn't Statement (2), v > 2, sufficient on its own? It feels sufficient because every quick case you try seems to make v^u the bigger one. Let me clear up exactly where that breaks.
What Statement (2) actually gives you: only that v >
2. It says
nothing about u. So to test sufficiency, you have to push on u - try values of u that might flip the result, not just the convenient ones.
Here's the minimal pair of cases, both obeying v >
2:
-
u = 1, v = 3 - u^v = 13 =
1, v^u = 31 =
3. Here v^u is greater.
-
u = 3, v = 3 - u^v = 33 =
27, v^u = 33 =
27. Here they're
equal - v^u is
not greater.
Same statement, two different answers to "which is greater?" -
not sufficient. That equal case (u = v) is exactly the situation Bunuel pointed anurag16 toward, and it's the one most people skip.
Why the trap is so easy to fall into: when you only test cases where u is small or clearly different from v, you keep landing on "v^u wins" and feel done. The DS rule to lock in:
one set of valid numbers isn't enough - you have to actively hunt for a second set that gives a different answer. Here, letting u equal v does it.
That's why you need Statement (1) too: u =
1 forces u^v =
1, and then v >
2 guarantees v^u = v >
1. Only together do they pin the answer down -
hence C.
Answer: C