Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 18:06 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 18:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Jan 2026
Posts: 1,135
Own Kudos:
22,610
 [27]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
27
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
811,082
 [8]
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,082
 [8]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ganand
Joined: 17 May 2015
Last visit: 19 Mar 2022
Posts: 198
Own Kudos:
3,826
 [5]
Given Kudos: 85
Posts: 198
Kudos: 3,826
 [5]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Alexey1989x
Joined: 05 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 May 2023
Posts: 187
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
Posts: 187
Kudos: 98
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

The question asks whether -1 < x < 1 (x ≠ 0).

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\) --> reduce the LHS by |x|: |x| > x. This implies that x is negative. Not sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\):

If x < 0, we'll have x/(-x) < x --> -1 < x. Since we consider x < 0, then we'll have -1 < x < 0.
If x > 0, we'll have x/x < x --> 1 < x.

So, we have that \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\) is true for -1 < x < 0 and x > 1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is -1 < x < 0. Thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hello Bunuel, could you please elaborate more on the (1) condition, I can't grasp how did you get that x is -ve.
Thx
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,082
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Alexey1989x
Bunuel
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

The question asks whether -1 < x < 1 (x ≠ 0).

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\) --> reduce the LHS by |x|: |x| > x. This implies that x is negative. Not sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\):

If x < 0, we'll have x/(-x) < x --> -1 < x. Since we consider x < 0, then we'll have -1 < x < 0.
If x > 0, we'll have x/x < x --> 1 < x.

So, we have that \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\) is true for -1 < x < 0 and x > 1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is -1 < x < 0. Thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hello Bunuel, could you please elaborate more on the (1) condition, I can't grasp how did you get that x is -ve.
Thx

We have |x| > x.

Now, if x were non-negative, then |x| would be equal to x, for example, if x=2, then |x| = |2| = 2 = x. Only for negative x we can have |x| > x. For example, consider x = -2: |x| = |-2| = 2 > x = 2.
User avatar
MahmoudFawzy
Joined: 27 Oct 2018
Last visit: 20 Feb 2021
Posts: 660
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 200
Status:Manager
Location: Egypt
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.67
WE:Pharmaceuticals (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Posts: 660
Kudos: 2,174
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

The question asks whether -1 < x < 1 (x ≠ 0).

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\) --> reduce the LHS by |x|: |x| > x. This implies that x is negative. Not sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\):

If x < 0, we'll have x/(-x) < x --> -1 < x. Since we consider x < 0, then we'll have -1 < x < 0.
If x > 0, we'll have x/x < x --> 1 < x.

So, we have that \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\) is true for -1 < x < 0 and x > 1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is -1 < x < 0. Thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Greetings Bunuel

in analyzing statement 2,

you mentioned : "If x < 0, we'll have x/(-x) < x --> -1 < x"

my question: why the inequality is not flipped?
isn't it right to flip the from '<' to '> ?

I think I am confused in this point, please elaborate. :blushing
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,082
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mahmoudfawzy83
Bunuel
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

The question asks whether -1 < x < 1 (x ≠ 0).

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\) --> reduce the LHS by |x|: |x| > x. This implies that x is negative. Not sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\):

If x < 0, we'll have x/(-x) < x --> -1 < x. Since we consider x < 0, then we'll have -1 < x < 0.
If x > 0, we'll have x/x < x --> 1 < x.

So, we have that \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\) is true for -1 < x < 0 and x > 1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is -1 < x < 0. Thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Greetings Bunuel

in analyzing statement 2,

you mentioned : "If x < 0, we'll have x/(-x) < x --> -1 < x"

my question: why the inequality is not flipped?
isn't it right to flip the from '<' to '> ?

I think I am confused in this point, please elaborate. :blushing

We are not dividing the entire inequality by x, we are simply reducing x/(-x) by x: x/(-x) = -(x/x) = -1.
avatar
GMATaspirant641
Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Last visit: 13 Feb 2022
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 11
Kudos: 96
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Please let me know where I am going wrong in my approach with statement 1.

x^2 / |x| > x

we know that the LHS will always be positive.

So, x^2 / |x| > 0 (its not >= 0 since x cannot be 0)

x^2 / |x| > 0

x^2 > 0

|x| > 0

so, x>0 and x<0. Hence, x can be any non zero number.

With this approach, i get answer choice E.

I also understand the approaches mentioned by you and others in the thread. But, I am not able to understand where I am going wrong. Please help.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,082
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATaspirant641
Bunuel

Please let me know where I am going wrong in my approach with statement 1.

x^2 / |x| > x

we know that the LHS will always be positive.

So, x^2 / |x| > 0 (its not >= 0 since x cannot be 0)

x^2 / |x| > 0

x^2 > 0

|x| > 0

so, x>0 and x<0. Hence, x can be any non zero number.

With this approach, i get answer choice E.

I also understand the approaches mentioned by you and others in the thread. But, I am not able to understand where I am going wrong. Please help.

Yes, \(\frac{x^2}{|x|} > 0\) is true of all x's except 0. But we don't have \(\frac{x^2}{|x|} > 0\), we have \(\frac{x^2}{|x|} > x\) and as shown above it won't hold true if x is positive. For example, if x = 2, then \(\frac{x^2}{|x|} =2\), so \(\frac{x^2}{|x|} = x\).
User avatar
rahul16singh28
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 09 Jun 2020
Posts: 428
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 752
Location: Malaysia
GPA: 3.95
WE:Consulting (Energy)
Posts: 428
Kudos: 503
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hazelnut
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\)

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\)

I have a hard time to answer this question. Could someone please help to explain?

Hi chetan2u Bunuel

By adding two equations, we get -

\(\frac{x}{{|x|}}(x-1) > 0\)

Here, x can be -1,2.

Can you please advise where I am going wrong.
User avatar
KanishkM
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 755
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
Posts: 755
Kudos: 512
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hazelnut
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\)

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\)

I have a hard time to answer this question. Could someone please help to explain?

Why didn't i use the values used in A, to negate B , Nevertheless inline is my approach

|x| < 1, will mean that -1<x<1

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\)

when you use -0.5, the value will answer the statement and will answer the question as Yes

but when you use -2, the value will answer the statement and will answer the question as No

4/2 > -2

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\)

when you use -0.5 , the value will answer the statement and will answer the question as Yes

-0.5 /0.5 < -0.5

But when you use 2, the value will answer the statement and will answer the question as No

Now when we combine both the statements for both the statements to be true together

When you use x =-0.5, equality holds good

C
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,082
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rahul16singh28
hazelnut
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\)

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\)

I have a hard time to answer this question. Could someone please help to explain?

Hi chetan2u Bunuel

By adding two equations, we get -

\(\frac{x}{{|x|}}(x-1) > 0\)

Here, x can be -1,2.

Can you please advise where I am going wrong.

We cannot add the inequalities the way you did.

You can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions:

If \(a>b\) and \(c<d\) (signs in opposite direction: \(>\) and \(<\)) --> \(a-c>b-d\) (take the sign of the inequality you subtract from).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(5>1\) --> \(3-5<4-1\).

You can only add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction:

If \(a>b\) and \(c>d\) (signs in same direction: \(>\) and \(>\)) --> \(a+c>b+d\).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(2<5\) --> \(3+2<4+5\).

For more check Manipulating Inequalities.
User avatar
NinetyFour
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Last visit: 22 Dec 2019
Posts: 182
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 182
Kudos: 216
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hazelnut
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\)

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\)


Here's my reasoning:

Statement 1:\(x^2 > x{|x|}\)

X can be both a negative integer and a negative decimal. Thus we get a YES and a NO for the stem above.

Statement 2: this tells us \(x < x{|x|}\)
X can be a positive integer or a negative fraction. Once again a YES and a NO for the stem above.

Combining the two the overlapping set is a negative fraction. Hence we can conclude \(|x|<1\)
avatar
ChairmanThe
Joined: 07 Jan 2020
Last visit: 04 Apr 2021
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 51
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

The question asks whether -1 < x < 1 (x ≠ 0).

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\) --> reduce the LHS by |x|: |x| > x. This implies that x is negative. Not sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\):

If x < 0, we'll have x/(-x) < x --> -1 < x. Since we consider x < 0, then we'll have -1 < x < 0.
If x > 0, we'll have x/x < x --> 1 < x.

So, we have that \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\) is true for -1 < x < 0 and x > 1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is -1 < x < 0. Thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.

Answer: C.




I am having trouble understanding how you simplify the first condition to |x| > x. Can you please elaborate on that?
Thanks
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,082
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ChairmanThe
Bunuel
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

The question asks whether -1 < x < 1 (x ≠ 0).

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\) --> reduce the LHS by |x|: |x| > x. This implies that x is negative. Not sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\):

If x < 0, we'll have x/(-x) < x --> -1 < x. Since we consider x < 0, then we'll have -1 < x < 0.
If x > 0, we'll have x/x < x --> 1 < x.

So, we have that \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\) is true for -1 < x < 0 and x > 1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is -1 < x < 0. Thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.

Answer: C.




I am having trouble understanding how you simplify the first condition to |x| > x. Can you please elaborate on that?
Thanks

\(\frac{x^2}{|x|}>x\);

\(\frac{|x|*|x|}{|x|}>x\);

\(|x|>x\).
avatar
ChairmanThe
Joined: 07 Jan 2020
Last visit: 04 Apr 2021
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 51
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
ChairmanThe
Bunuel
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

The question asks whether -1 < x < 1 (x ≠ 0).

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\) --> reduce the LHS by |x|: |x| > x. This implies that x is negative. Not sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\):

If x < 0, we'll have x/(-x) < x --> -1 < x. Since we consider x < 0, then we'll have -1 < x < 0.
If x > 0, we'll have x/x < x --> 1 < x.

So, we have that \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\) is true for -1 < x < 0 and x > 1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is -1 < x < 0. Thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.

Answer: C.




I am having trouble understanding how you simplify the first condition to |x| > x. Can you please elaborate on that?
Thanks

\(\frac{x^2}{|x|}>x\);

\(\frac{|x|*|x|}{|x|}>x\);

\(|x|>x\).



But why are you using |x|∗|x| when you are factoring X^2. Couldn't it be -x *-x and give you the same value for X^2?
Thanks
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,082
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ChairmanThe
Bunuel
ChairmanThe
Bunuel
If \(x ≠ 0\), is \(|x|<1\)?

The question asks whether -1 < x < 1 (x ≠ 0).

(1) \(\frac{x^2}{{|x|}} > x\) --> reduce the LHS by |x|: |x| > x. This implies that x is negative. Not sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\):

If x < 0, we'll have x/(-x) < x --> -1 < x. Since we consider x < 0, then we'll have -1 < x < 0.
If x > 0, we'll have x/x < x --> 1 < x.

So, we have that \(\frac{x}{{|x|}} < x\) is true for -1 < x < 0 and x > 1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is -1 < x < 0. Thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.

Answer: C.




I am having trouble understanding how you simplify the first condition to |x| > x. Can you please elaborate on that?
Thanks

\(\frac{x^2}{|x|}>x\);

\(\frac{|x|*|x|}{|x|}>x\);

\(|x|>x\).



But why are you using |x|∗|x| when you are factoring X^2. Couldn't it be -x *-x and give you the same value for X^2?
Thanks

x^2 = |x|*|x| and if you write it that way you'd be able to simplify \(\frac{x^2}{|x|}>x\) and get \(|x|>x\).
Moderators:
Math Expert
109818 posts
498 posts
212 posts