ANALysis
mperalta
I find that NYU has a fantastic program, great location and strong alumni network. Why is it that it's so poorly ranked, when compared to the likes of Columbia, Wharton, or Haas? What does it have going against it?
job placement below average
Not really...
Columbia ... vs. NYU Stern:
graduates seeking employment: 75.7% ... vs. ... 90.7% (the only schools higher than Stern are Darden, Fuqua, Johnson, McCombs, Foster, Scheller, Carey and Wisconsin)
% of seekers reporting base salary: 70.2% ... vs. ... 89.2% (the only schools higher than Stern are Kellogg, Darden, Ross, Foster,
% of seekers reporting both base and bonus: 67.9% ... vs. ... 86.3% (the only schools higher than Stern are Kellogg, Darden, Tuck, Ross and Simon)
In the GMATClub rankings that were published a few weeks ago, we assumed that students not reporting did so because they were under-employed and it'd make them look bad (low salary, no job, unimpressive job, etc.) ... and, so with the adjustments made, Columbia's average adjusted total 1st year compensation for the entire class was $159,513 ... and Stern's was $163,100.
Stern ranked 4th in ROI (a comparison of adjusted 1st year compensation vs. the cost to attend the school) -- behind only Darden, Wharton and Kellogg.
Columbia ranked 14th (behind the four schools above, plus (in order) Booth, Johnson, Tuck, HArvard, Haas, Ross, Fuqua, Stanford and Yale).