Last visit was: 10 Sep 2026, 11:34 It is currently 10 Sep 2026, 11:34
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
MHIKER
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Last visit: 24 May 2021
Posts: 935
Own Kudos:
5,971
 [469]
Given Kudos: 690
Status:No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Concentration: Accounting
Posts: 935
Kudos: 5,971
 [469]
20
Kudos
Add Kudos
448
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
subhashghosh
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 894
Own Kudos:
1,328
 [23]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Products:
Posts: 894
Kudos: 1,328
 [23]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,401
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,453
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,401
Kudos: 840,504
 [217]
71
Kudos
Add Kudos
144
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nitin6305
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Last visit: 22 Jan 2017
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
468
 [78]
Given Kudos: 174
Status:How easy it is?
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE:Operations (Other)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 72
Kudos: 468
 [78]
75
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please find attached graphical solution. I think its easier and simpler to solve such inequality problem using co-ordinate geometry.

I made this graph in a hurry in paint, so please don't mind the poorly drawn lines.

Consider pressing on Kudos if my post helped you in any way!
Attachments

Solution.JPG
Solution.JPG [ 39.4 KiB | Viewed 211350 times ]

User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,401
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,453
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,401
Kudos: 840,504
 [58]
41
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post


Is xy > 0?

\(xy>0\) means that x and y must have the same sign, so point (x, y) must be either in the first or the third quadrant (green regions).

(1) x-y > -2 --> \(y<x+2\) --> the area below blue line (\(y=x+2\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y < -6 --> \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\) --> the area above red line (\(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Below blue line and above red line, is yellow region, which is entirely in I quadrant (where \(y>4\) and \(x>2\)) --> \(xy>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.

Attachment:
xy.png
xy.png [ 8.35 KiB | Viewed 245104 times ]
avatar
AkshayDavid
Joined: 23 Jul 2013
Last visit: 18 Nov 2014
Posts: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Graphic approach:

Attachment:
xy.png

Is xy > 0?

\(xy>0\) means that x and y must have the same sign, so point (x, y) must be either in the first or the third quadrant (green regions).

(1) x-y > -2 --> \(y<x+2\) --> the area below blue line (\(y=x+2\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y < -6 --> \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\) --> the area above red line (\(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Below blue line and above red line, is yellow region, which is entirely in I quadrant (where \(y>4\) and \(x>2\)) --> \(xy>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.


Hi Bunuel,

I have doubts on graphical method -->

why is line y<x+2 passing through x = -2 ?
the value of x should be greater than -2 (the line may pass through x = -1, 0, 1, 2, ...)
Similarly, why is line y > (x/2) + 3 passing through x = -6
the value of x should be less than -6 (the line may pass through x = -7, -8, -9,...)

With the graphical method, can you illustrate solution of following example ?

Is x + y > 0 ?

1) x - y > 0
2) x^2 - y^2 > 0

Regards,
Akshay
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,401
Own Kudos:
840,504
 [2]
Given Kudos: 111,453
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,401
Kudos: 840,504
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AkshayDavid
Bunuel

Graphic approach:




Is xy > 0?

\(xy>0\) means that x and y must have the same sign, so point (x, y) must be either in the first or the third quadrant (green regions).

(1) x-y > -2 --> \(y<x+2\) --> the area below blue line (\(y=x+2\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y < -6 --> \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\) --> the area above red line (\(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Below blue line and above red line, is yellow region, which is entirely in I quadrant (where \(y>4\) and \(x>2\)) --> \(xy>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.


Hi Bunuel,

I have doubts on graphical method -->

why is line y<x+2 passing through x = -2 ?
the value of x should be greater than -2 (the line may pass through x = -1, 0, 1, 2, ...)
Similarly, why is line y > (x/2) + 3 passing through x = -6
the value of x should be less than -6 (the line may pass through x = -7, -8, -9,...)

With the graphical method, can you illustrate solution of following example ?

Is x + y > 0 ?

1) x - y > 0
2) x^2 - y^2 > 0

Regards,
Akshay

y < x + 2 is the region which lies BELOW (because of < sign) line y = x + 2.

y > x/2 + 3 is the region which lies ABOVE (because of > sign) line y = x/2 + 3.

Check here for more: graphic-approach-to-problems-with-inequalities-68037.html

Hope it helps.
avatar
healthjunkie
Joined: 14 Oct 2013
Last visit: 01 Jun 2016
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 120
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I approached the 1&2 decision the same way as Bunuel but just had a clarifying question. When we subtract the two inequalities from eachother..how do we know that the sign stays as greater than (i.e. how do we know that it's y>4 instead of y<4). I assumed it was y>4 and got the question correct because i was subtracting a less than equation from a greater than equation but I have a feeling that's not the right logic. Thanks!
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,651
Own Kudos:
21,401
 [12]
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,651
Kudos: 21,401
 [12]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
healthjunkie
Hi,

I approached the 1&2 decision the same way as Bunuel but just had a clarifying question. When we subtract the two inequalities from eachother..how do we know that the sign stays as greater than (i.e. how do we know that it's y>4 instead of y<4). I assumed it was y>4 and got the question correct because i was subtracting a less than equation from a greater than equation but I have a feeling that's not the right logic. Thanks!


Hi healthjunkie,

Let me help you out with such operations on inequalities.

Assume two inequalities x + y > 10......(1)
& x - y < 2........(2)

We see here that both the inequalities have opposite signs.

The basic concept of the inequality says to convert the inequalities into same sign before adding or subtracting them.

We can change the sign of the inequality by multiplying -1 on both sides of the inequality. Let's do it on inequality (2)

x - y < 2, multiplying -1 on both sides we get
-x + y > -2.

Since we have inequality (1) & (2) with the same signs we can add them now

x + y -x + y > 10 -2 i.e. y > 4.

Note here that adding inequality (1) to inequality (2) after multiplying inequality (2) by -1 is similar to subtracting inequality (2) from inequality (1). This concept is used when we say that we can subtract two inequalities with opposite signs.

In this question you asked we subtracted inequality in st-II from inequality in st-I which incidentally meant that st-II was multiplied by -1 and then added to st-I. So, the sign of inequality in st-II flipped.

x - 2y < -6, multiplying it with -1 gave the inequality -x + 2y > 6 which was then added to inequality in st-I

Hope its clear :-D

Regards
Harsh
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel


Is xy>0?

Note that question basically asks whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign.

(1) x-y > -2 --> we can have an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=10\) and \(y=1\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is positive and \(y\) is negative (\(x=10\) and \(y=-10\)). Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y <-6 --> again it' easy to get an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=1\) and \(y=10\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is negative and \(y\) is positive (\(x=-1\) and \(y=10\)). Not sufficient.

You can get that the the two statement individually are not sufficient in another way too: we have (1) \(y<x+2\) and (2) \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\). We are asked whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign or whether the points (x,y) are in the I or III quadrant ONLY. But all (x,y) points below the line \(y=x+2\) (for 1) and all (x, y) points above the line \(y=\frac{x}{2}+3\) can not lie only I or III quadrant: points above or below some line (not parallel to axis) lie at least in 3 quadrants.

(1)+(2) Now, remember that we can subtract inequalities with the signs in opposite direction --> subtract (2) from (1): \(x-y-(x-2y)>-2-(-6)\) --> \(y>4\). As \(y>4\) and (from 1) \(x>y-2\) then \(x>2\) (because we can add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction, so: \(y+x>4+(y-2)\) --> \(x>2\)) --> we have that \(y>4\) and \(x>2\): both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Dear Bunuel,

Please find my attached process.

However, the combined solving of eqns gave me, x<-4 or x>-1, a case in which we cannot comment on sign of x. Can you please help me understand where I have gone wrong?
Attachments

IMG_20160401_163125.jpg
IMG_20160401_163125.jpg [ 2.2 MiB | Viewed 181231 times ]

User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 11,291
Own Kudos:
46,135
 [4]
Given Kudos: 339
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,291
Kudos: 46,135
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Alok322
Bunuel


Is xy>0?

Note that question basically asks whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign.

(1) x-y > -2 --> we can have an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=10\) and \(y=1\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is positive and \(y\) is negative (\(x=10\) and \(y=-10\)). Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y <-6 --> again it' easy to get an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=1\) and \(y=10\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is negative and \(y\) is positive (\(x=-1\) and \(y=10\)). Not sufficient.

You can get that the the two statement individually are not sufficient in another way too: we have (1) \(y<x+2\) and (2) \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\). We are asked whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign or whether the points (x,y) are in the I or III quadrant ONLY. But all (x,y) points below the line \(y=x+2\) (for 1) and all (x, y) points above the line \(y=\frac{x}{2}+3\) can not lie only I or III quadrant: points above or below some line (not parallel to axis) lie at least in 3 quadrants.

(1)+(2) Now, remember that we can subtract inequalities with the signs in opposite direction --> subtract (2) from (1): \(x-y-(x-2y)>-2-(-6)\) --> \(y>4\). As \(y>4\) and (from 1) \(x>y-2\) then \(x>2\) (because we can add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction, so: \(y+x>4+(y-2)\) --> \(x>2\)) --> we have that \(y>4\) and \(x>2\): both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Dear Bunuel,

Please find my attached process.

However, the combined solving of eqns gave me, x<-4 or x>-1, a case in which we cannot comment on sign of x. Can you please help me understand where I have gone wrong?

Hi,
your Equations are further to be simplified..

you got
2y-6 > x> y-2
we can infer 2y-6>y-2...
or 2y-y>6-2 that is y>4..
if y>4 and x+2>y, x will be >2..
thus both x and y are +ive and our answer is YES for xy>0..

Do not substitute value in 2y-6 > x> y-2 and find the signs of x and y..
User avatar
bimalr9
Joined: 20 Mar 2015
Last visit: 07 Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 39
Kudos: 364
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u Looks like how I came with the solution is wrong. Since statement 1 and 2 are not sufficient I tried to combine the two statements.

1. X- Y>-2 2. X-2Y <-6

FROM 1: X>Y-2-------(WE HAVE A VALUE FOR X) substituting this value in statement 2 yields;

Y-2 -2Y<-6
OR, -Y < -4
OR, Y> 4 (MUTLIPLYING BOTH SIDES WITH A NEGATIVE SIGN.)

SINCE Y> 4, FROM STATEMETN ONE

X-Y>-2 OR, X- 4.1> -2, SOLVING FOR THIS WOULD GIVE X>2.1.

Is my process correct?
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 11,291
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 339
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,291
Kudos: 46,135
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bimalr9
chetan2u Looks like how I came with the solution is wrong. Since statement 1 and 2 are not sufficient I tried to combine the two statements.

1. X- Y>-2 2. X-2Y <-6

FROM 1: X>Y-2-------(WE HAVE A VALUE FOR X) substituting this value in statement 2 yields;

Y-2 -2Y<-6
OR, -Y < -4
OR, Y> 4 (MUTLIPLYING BOTH SIDES WITH A NEGATIVE SIGN.)

SINCE Y> 4, FROM STATEMETN ONE

X-Y>-2 OR, X- 4.1> -2, SOLVING FOR THIS WOULD GIVE X>2.1.

Is my process correct?

HI,
In this Q it is ok..
But a lot depends on '>' and '<' signs.. you cannot substitute without knowing these..
1. X- Y>-2 ...... x>y-2
2. X-2Y <-6..... x<2y-6..
so y-2<x<2y-6....
so here clearly y-2<2y-6 .... or y>4...
so form equations then substitute...
User avatar
alpham
Joined: 13 Jun 2016
Last visit: 13 Jul 2025
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 424
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GRE 1: Q168 V167
GPA: 3.8
GRE 1: Q168 V167
Posts: 70
Kudos: 497
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I didn't know that you can subtract opposite sign equations and actually I feel that many will still get the sign mixed up as to whether it would be < or >. Instead you can flip one of the equations and then you will end up with one sign and then just add from there. That way, there is less chance for a mistake to occur.
User avatar
JeffTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 2,973
Own Kudos:
8,958
 [40]
Given Kudos: 1,646
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 2,973
Kudos: 8,958
 [40]
31
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Baten80
Is xy > 0?

(1) x - y > -2
(2) x - 2y < -6

We need to determine whether the product of x and y is positive. We should recall that the product of two numbers is positive only if both the numbers are positive or if both are negative.

Statement One Alone:

x - y > -2

Statement one tells us that the difference between x and y is -2; it does not tell us anything about the signs of x and y. For instance, if x = 2 and y = 1, we have x - y = 1 > -2, and xy is positive. However, if x = 3 and y = -2, 3 - (-2) = 5 > -2, but xy is negative. Statement one alone is not sufficient. We can eliminate answer choices A and D.

Statement Two Alone:

x - 2y < -6

Again, we have a statement that tells us nothing about the signs of x and y. For instance, if x = 3 and y = 5, then x - 2y = 3 - 2(5) = 3 - 10 = -7 < -6, and xy is positive. However, if x = -1 and y = 5, then x - 2y = -1 - 2(5) = -11 < -6, and xy is negative. Statement two alone is not sufficient. We can eliminate answer choice B.

Statements One and Two Together:

Let’s manipulate the first inequality to read: y < x + 2. Similarly, we can manipulate the second inequality to read: y > (1/2)x + 3.

Thus, we can say the following:

(1/2)x + 3 < y < x + 2

(1/2)x + 3 < x + 2

x + 6 < 2x + 4

2 < x

Thus, x is positive.

We also know the following:

y > (1/2)x + 3

Since x is greater than two, let’s see what we can determine about y, if we substitute 2 for x.

y > (1/2)(2) + 3

y > 4

So y is positive as well. Both statements together are sufficient.

Answer: C
avatar
Tpral
Joined: 17 Mar 2017
Last visit: 08 Mar 2018
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V22
GMAT 2: 510 Q47 V15
GMAT 2: 510 Q47 V15
Posts: 6
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Bunuel,

I arrive to y>4.

When you replace it in (1) it makes x>2: OK

But

When you replace it in (2) it makes x - 2(4) < -6 ; so x <2 and so can be negative or positive.

Could you advise when replacing in (1) X>2 (answer =C) and when replacing in (2) we have answer (E) as x<2.

Thanks in advance,
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,401
Own Kudos:
840,504
 [1]
Given Kudos: 111,453
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,401
Kudos: 840,504
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tpral
Hello Bunuel,

I arrive to y>4.

When you replace it in (1) it makes x>2: OK

But

When you replace it in (2) it makes x - 2(4) < -6 ; so x <2 and so can be negative or positive.

Could you advise when replacing in (1) X>2 (answer =C) and when replacing in (2) we have answer (E) as x<2.

Thanks in advance,

We got y > 4 not y = 4, so you cannot substitute the way you did. In the solution, x > 2, is derived by adding y > 4 and x > y - 2 (we can add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction): \(y+x>4+(y-2)\) --> \(x>2\).
avatar
AOD
Joined: 31 Mar 2018
Last visit: 18 Nov 2022
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
Posts: 9
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel



We got y > 4 not y = 4, so you cannot substitute the way you did. In the solution, x > 2, is derived by adding y > 4 and x > y - 2 (we can add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction): \(y+x>4+(y-2)\) --> \(x>2\).

Hi Bunuel ,

Kindly clarify -

"In the Solution of X>2" : Instead of adding Y>4 and X > Y-2 (from equation 1) , can we not add Y>4 and -X> 6-2y ? (from equation 2 : x-2y <-6)

If we do this , we will arrive at X < 2
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,401
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,453
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,401
Kudos: 840,504
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AOD
Bunuel



We got y > 4 not y = 4, so you cannot substitute the way you did. In the solution, x > 2, is derived by adding y > 4 and x > y - 2 (we can add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction): \(y+x>4+(y-2)\) --> \(x>2\).

Hi Bunuel ,

Kindly clarify -

"In the Solution of X>2" : Instead of adding Y>4 and X > Y-2 (from equation 1) , can we not add Y>4 and -X> 6-2y ? (from equation 2 : x-2y <-6)

If we do this , we will arrive at X < 2

y > 4
-x > 6 - 2y

Adding those gives:
y - x > 10 - 2y
3y - x > 10
avatar
AOD
Joined: 31 Mar 2018
Last visit: 18 Nov 2022
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
Posts: 9
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
AOD
Bunuel



We got y > 4 not y = 4, so you cannot substitute the way you did. In the solution, x > 2, is derived by adding y > 4 and x > y - 2 (we can add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction): \(y+x>4+(y-2)\) --> \(x>2\).

Hi Bunuel ,

Kindly clarify -

"In the Solution of X>2" : Instead of adding Y>4 and X > Y-2 (from equation 1) , can we not add Y>4 and -X> 6-2y ? (from equation 2 : x-2y <-6)

If we do this , we will arrive at X < 2

y > 4
-x > 6 - 2y

Adding those gives:
y - x > 10 - 2y
3y - x > 10

Sorry Bunuel , I still don't follow. Maybe I'm missing something.

Last step =3y - x > 10

Substituting Y >4 : 12 - X > 10 -> 2 > X -> X < 2 : right?
 1   2   
Moderator:
Math Expert
113401 posts