Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Dec 1410:00 AM EST
-12:00 PM EST
Think a 100% GMAT Verbal score is out of your reach? Target Test Prep will make you think again! Our course uses techniques such as topical study and spaced repetition to maximize knowledge retention and make studying simple and fun.
Dec 1411:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this session to learn how to Deconstruct arguments, Pre-Think Author’s Assumptions, and apply Negation Test.
Dec 1310:00 AM EST
-12:00 PM EST
Have you ever wondered how to score a PERFECT 805 on the GMAT? Meet Julia, a banking professional who used the Target Test Prep course to achieve this incredible feat. Julia's story is nothing short of an inspiration.- Dec 15
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Dec 1608:00 AM PST
-11:59 PM PST
GMAT Club 12 Days of Christmas is a 4th Annual GMAT Club Winter Competition based on solving questions. This is the Winter GMAT competition on GMAT Club with an amazing opportunity to win over $40,000 worth of prizes!- Dec 17
09:00 AM PST
-10:00 AM PST
Join Manhattan Prep instructor Whitney Garner for a fun—and thorough—review of logic-based (non-math) problems, with a particular emphasis on Data Sufficiency and Two-Parts. - Dec 18
10:00 AM PST
-11:00 AM PST
Here is the essential guide to securing scholarships as an MBA student! In this video, we explore the various types of scholarships available, including need-based and merit-based options.
avohden
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Last visit: 14 Mar 2015
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 630
Status:1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Location: United States (FL)
Schools: Warrington (A)
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
GMAT 2: 610 Q44 V30
GMAT 3: 600 Q45 V29
GMAT 4: 590 Q35 V35
GPA: 3.45
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
58% (02:14) correct
42%
(02:44)
wrong
based on 306
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
We favor the abolition of the equal access rule now governing network television news. Experience shows that, even without the rule, network news departments would generally be responsible enough to give roughly equal coverage to both major-party candidates in most elections, while even fringe and minor-party candidates would be probably receive some coverage as well. In any case, minor-party candidates would continue to have access to network time for paid political advertisements on the same terms as the major-party candidates, just as they do now.
A leader of a minor political party seeking maximum exposure for his or her candidates would be most interested in having the author of the above statement answer which of the following questions?
(A) How much total network time should be devoted to news coverage of all candidates in election news?
(B) What if only one major party offers a candidate in a particular local election race?
(C) Are the networks willing to include position statements by the minor-party candidates themselves in their coverage of those candidates’ races?
(D) Who would guarantee that ample network time for paid political advertisements would be continue to be readily available?
(E) What if a minor-party candidate cannot afford to buy network time in which to show paid political advertisements?
Source: LSAT - Harcourt Brace - I/II/#26
Please indicate if OE is needed...
A leader of a minor political party seeking maximum exposure for his or her candidates would be most interested in having the author of the above statement answer which of the following questions?
(A) How much total network time should be devoted to news coverage of all candidates in election news?
(B) What if only one major party offers a candidate in a particular local election race?
(C) Are the networks willing to include position statements by the minor-party candidates themselves in their coverage of those candidates’ races?
(D) Who would guarantee that ample network time for paid political advertisements would be continue to be readily available?
(E) What if a minor-party candidate cannot afford to buy network time in which to show paid political advertisements?
Source: LSAT - Harcourt Brace - I/II/#26
Please indicate if OE is needed...
26 Oct 2013, 06:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
avohden
We favor the abolition of the equal access rule now governing network television news. Experience shows
that, even without the rule, network news departments would generally be responsible enough to give roughly
equal coverage to both major-party candidates in most elections, while even fringe and minor-party candidates
would be probably receive some coverage as well. In any case, minor-party candidates would continue to have
access to network time for paid political advertisements on the same terms as the major-party candidates,
just as they do now.
A leader of a minor political party seeking maximum exposure for his or her candidates would be most interested
in having the author of the above statement answer which of the following questions?
(A) How much total network time should be devoted to news coverage of all candidates in election news?
(B) What if only one major party offers a candidate in a particular local election race?
(C) Are the networks willing to include position statements by the minor-party candidates themselves in
their coverage of those candidates’ races?
(D) Who would guarantee that ample network time for paid political advertisements would be continue to
be readily available?
(E) What is a minor-party candidate cannot afford to buy network time in which to show paid political advertisements?
Source: LSAT - Harcourt Brace - I/II/#26
Please indicate if OE is needed...
(A) How much total network time should be devoted to news coverage of all candidates in election news?-It doesn't matter to the minor party candidates. IrrelevantIncorrect that, even without the rule, network news departments would generally be responsible enough to give roughly
equal coverage to both major-party candidates in most elections, while even fringe and minor-party candidates
would be probably receive some coverage as well. In any case, minor-party candidates would continue to have
access to network time for paid political advertisements on the same terms as the major-party candidates,
just as they do now.
A leader of a minor political party seeking maximum exposure for his or her candidates would be most interested
in having the author of the above statement answer which of the following questions?
(A) How much total network time should be devoted to news coverage of all candidates in election news?
(B) What if only one major party offers a candidate in a particular local election race?
(C) Are the networks willing to include position statements by the minor-party candidates themselves in
their coverage of those candidates’ races?
(D) Who would guarantee that ample network time for paid political advertisements would be continue to
be readily available?
(E) What is a minor-party candidate cannot afford to buy network time in which to show paid political advertisements?
Source: LSAT - Harcourt Brace - I/II/#26
Please indicate if OE is needed...
(B) What if only one major party offers a candidate in a particular local election race?Equal access rule is concerned with major and minor party candidates, that they should have equal network coverage.It doesn't matter if the number of major party candidates is 1 or 2Incorrect
(C) Are the networks willing to include position statements by the minor-party candidates themselves in
their coverage of those candidates’ races?the responsibilty to coverage is theirs. Since they are providing equal coverage to both the parties it doesnt matterIncorrect
(D) Who would guarantee that ample network time for paid political advertisements would be continue to
be readily available?That is their duty to provide itIrrelevant
(E) What is a minor-party candidate cannot afford to buy network time in which to show paid political advertisements?Yes this is important to know because if its the case the coverage wont be equal for them Correct
26 Oct 2013, 18:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
avohden
We favor the abolition of the equal access rule now governing network television news. Experience shows
that, even without the rule, network news departments would generally be responsible enough to give roughly
equal coverage to both major-party candidates in most elections, while even fringe and minor-party candidates
would be probably receive some coverage as well. In any case, minor-party candidates would continue to have
access to network time for paid political advertisements on the same terms as the major-party candidates,
just as they do now.
A leader of a minor political party seeking maximum exposure for his or her candidates would be most interested
in having the author of the above statement answer which of the following questions?
(A) How much total network time should be devoted to news coverage of all candidates in election news?
(B) What if only one major party offers a candidate in a particular local election race?
(C) Are the networks willing to include position statements by the minor-party candidates themselves in
their coverage of those candidates’ races?
(D) Who would guarantee that ample network time for paid political advertisements would be continue to
be readily available?
(E) What is a minor-party candidate cannot afford to buy network time in which to show paid political advertisements?
Source: LSAT - Harcourt Brace - I/II/#26
Please indicate if OE is needed...
that, even without the rule, network news departments would generally be responsible enough to give roughly
equal coverage to both major-party candidates in most elections, while even fringe and minor-party candidates
would be probably receive some coverage as well. In any case, minor-party candidates would continue to have
access to network time for paid political advertisements on the same terms as the major-party candidates,
just as they do now.
A leader of a minor political party seeking maximum exposure for his or her candidates would be most interested
in having the author of the above statement answer which of the following questions?
(A) How much total network time should be devoted to news coverage of all candidates in election news?
(B) What if only one major party offers a candidate in a particular local election race?
(C) Are the networks willing to include position statements by the minor-party candidates themselves in
their coverage of those candidates’ races?
(D) Who would guarantee that ample network time for paid political advertisements would be continue to
be readily available?
(E) What is a minor-party candidate cannot afford to buy network time in which to show paid political advertisements?
Source: LSAT - Harcourt Brace - I/II/#26
Please indicate if OE is needed...
The reasonings of the author are just missleading to the leader of a minority party, b/c he/she has just focused on "equal access". However, no information is paid attention to "paid" political advertisements. The "access" is affected not only by "equal rule" but also " the ads paid before". So, the leader would have the author answer the question as E : what if....
