GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Oct 2019, 05:31

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Posts: 293
Location: Canada
Reviews Badge
When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 04 Oct 2017, 02:59
1
15
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (02:40) correct 48% (02:49) wrong based on 651 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enacted requiring that manufacturers use the term “imitation butter” to indicate butter whose butterfat content had been diminished through the addition of water. Today, it is known that the high cholesterol content of butterfat makes it harmful to human health. Since the public should be encouraged to eat foods with lower rather than higher butterfat content and since the term “imitation” with its connotations of falsity deters many people from purchasing products so designated, manufactures who wish to give reduced-butterfat butter the more appealing name of “lite butter” should be allowed to do so.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

(A) The manufacturers who prefer to use the word “lite” instead of “imitation” are motivated principally by the financial interest of their stock holders.

(B) The manufacturers who wish to call their product “lite butter” plan to change the composition of the product so that it contains more water than it now does.

(C) Some individuals who need to reduce their intake of cholesterol are not deterred from using the reduced-butterfat product by the negative connotations of the term
“imitation.”

(D) Cholesterol is only one of many factors that contribute to the types of health problems with which the consumption of excessive amounts of cholesterol is often associated.

(E) Most people deterred from eating “imitation butter” because of its name choose alternatives with a lower butterfat content than this product has.

Source: LSAT

Originally posted by vikasp99 on 15 Mar 2017, 03:28.
Last edited by broall on 04 Oct 2017, 02:59, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 19 Apr 2016
Posts: 269
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q48 V22
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.5
WE: Web Development (Computer Software)
Re: When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2017, 02:03
1
vikasp99 wrote:
When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enacted requiring that manufacturers use the term “imitation butter” to indicate butter whose butterfat content had been diminished through the addition of water. Today, it is known that the high cholesterol content of butterfat makes it harmful to human health. Since the public should be encouraged to eat foods with lower rather than higher butterfat content and since the term “imitation” with its connotations of falsity deters many people from purchasing products so designated, manufactures who wish to give reduced-butterfat butter the more appealing name of “lite butter” should be allowed to do so.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

(A) The manufacturers who prefer to use the word “lite” instead of “imitation” are motivated principally by the financial interest of their stock holders.

(B) The manufacturers who wish to call their product “lite butter” plan to change the composition of the product so that it contains more water than it now does.

(C) Some individuals who need to reduce their intake of cholesterol are not deterred from using the reduced-butterfat product by the negative connotations of the term
“imitation.”

(D) Cholesterol is only one of many factors that contribute to the types of health problems with which the consumption of excessive amounts of cholesterol is often associated.

(E) Most people deterred from eating “imitation butter” because of its name choose alternatives with a lower butterfat content than this product has.



The argument says "public should be encouraged to eat foods with lower rather than higher butterfat content but the term “imitation” with its connotations of falsity deters many people from purchasing products so designated"

option E weakens the argument by saying that people who deterred from eating “imitation butter” because of its name choose alternatives with a lower butterfat content than this product has.

Hence option E is correct
Hit Kudos if you liked it 8-)
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1195
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2017, 11:30
1
1
Source: LSAT practice test 9;

According to me answer is "A". Can anyone explain why is it wrong? I understand OA is also correct but why not A?
Attachments

16.PNG
16.PNG [ 130.13 KiB | Viewed 4062 times ]

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 14 Sep 2015
Posts: 64
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q45 V40
GPA: 3.41
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2017, 12:34
2
1
gmatexam439 wrote:

According to me answer is "A". Can anyone explain why is it wrong? I understand OA is also correct but why not A?


As per my understanding of the question, the conclusion is that the manufacturers should be allowed to use the name "lite" instead of imitation and the argument that the author uses is that imitation butter, even though it has less fat and is healthier to consume, is not being purchased by the public because of the connotations of falsity associated with the term "imitation".

The question is which option undermines the argument most
E renders the health argument used by the manufacturers of imitation butter invalid. it states that the public chooses a healthier product than the imitation butter.
A on the other hand does not touch this at all. It just states what the reason for the manufacturers to want to change the name is. Which is irrelevant to this particular question.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1195
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2017, 12:47
niteshwaghray wrote:
gmatexam439 wrote:

According to me answer is "A". Can anyone explain why is it wrong? I understand OA is also correct but why not A?


As per my understanding of the question, the conclusion is that the manufacturers should be allowed to use the name "lite" instead of imitation and the argument that the author uses is that imitation butter, even though it has less fat and is healthier to consume, is not being purchased by the public because of the connotations of falsity associated with the term "imitation".

The question is which option undermines the argument most
E renders the health argument used by the manufacturers of imitation butter invalid. it states that the public chooses a healthier product than the imitation butter.
A on the other hand does not touch this at all. It just states what the reason for the manufacturers to want to change the name is. Which is irrelevant to this particular question.


Thanks bro fro the explanation .. +1 :)
_________________
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jul 2018
Posts: 104
Concentration: Finance, Statistics
GMAT 1: 620 Q45 V31
GMAT ToolKit User
When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Oct 2018, 23:35
GMATNinja sir please explain why e and not a?
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Posts: 146
WE: Operations (Commercial Banking)
Re: When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2018, 11:38
What is wrong with answer choice C?

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 28 May 2018
Posts: 143
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (II)
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 670 Q45 V37
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V40
CAT Tests
Re: When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2018, 12:29
3
1
The conclusion states that manufactures should be allowed to rename "Imitation butter" to "Lite butter". Any option that gives us a reason that renaming the product would result in a misconception that the product is healthier is or answer choice.

vikasp99 wrote:
When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enacted requiring that manufacturers use the term “imitation butter” to indicate butter whose butterfat content had been diminished through the addition of water. Today, it is known that the high cholesterol content of butterfat makes it harmful to human health. Since the public should be encouraged to eat foods with lower rather than higher butterfat content and since the term “imitation” with its connotations of falsity deters many people from purchasing products so designated, manufactures who wish to give reduced-butterfat butter the more appealing name of “lite butter” should be allowed to do so.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

(A) The manufacturers who prefer to use the word “lite” instead of “imitation” are motivated principally by the financial interest of their stock holders.
The intentions of the manufacturers are irrelevant. It is the implication that matters.

(B) The manufacturers who wish to call their product “lite butter” plan to change the composition of the product so that it contains more water than it now does.
If the product contains more water, it would probably be healthier. There is no reason to stop the renaming then.

(C) Some individuals who need to reduce their intake of cholesterol are not deterred from using the reduced-butterfat product by the negative connotations of the term
“imitation.”
This option only speaks about "some" individuals. Other individuals may be deterred by the negative connotations. Hence renaming would be good way to attaract those individuals.

(D) Cholesterol is only one of many factors that contribute to the types of health problems with which the consumption of excessive amounts of cholesterol is often associated.
We are not concerned if cholesterol is the only factor or one of many factors. The fact that cholesterol is harmful is what matters.

(E) Most people deterred from eating “imitation butter” because of its name choose alternatives with a lower butterfat content than this product has.
Most people have already found other products. So renaming the product might not attract customers who are already aware of the butterfat content.

Source: LSAT

_________________
Please award KUDOS if my post helps. Thank you.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
D
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2857
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Oct 2018, 09:09
1
1
manjot123 wrote:
GMATNinja sir please explain why e and not a?

It looks like 0akshay0 and niteshwaghray have identified why (E) is the best choice and why (A) doesn't do anything to weaken the argument. Nice work on this one!

I'll add a reminder that it's very important to clarify the conclusion that you're trying to weaken before you begin eliminating answer choices.

In this case, the author concludes that manufacturers should be allowed to label reduced-butterfat butter with the name "lite butter." The author implies that if the label change is allowed, then the public will stop avoiding reduced-butterfat butter. And once they start buying reduced-butterfat butter, they will be eating fewer foods with higher butterfat content.

Quote:
(E) Most people deterred from eating “imitation butter” because of its name choose alternatives with a lower butterfat content than this product has.

However, (E) introduces evidence that most people who are avoiding reduced-butterfat butter are in fact eating alternative foods with lower butterfat content. Switching over to "lite butter" won't lead to a reduction in the consumption of higher butterfat foods. So if (E) is true, then the whole point of this conclusion turns out to be moot.

Quote:
(A) The manufacturers who prefer to use the word “lite” instead of “imitation” are motivated principally by the financial interest of their stock holders.

Choice (A), on the other hand, runs away from the point of this conclusion. We just spent precious moments of our lives reading about how butterfat content impacts the health of people who consume it. The conclusion focuses on the effect of a label change on consumer decisions about what butter to buy. Why, then, would we care about the motivations of butter manufacturers?

Well, we don't. That's why we eliminate (A).

aditliverpoolfc wrote:
What is wrong with answer choice C?

Quote:
(C) Some individuals who need to reduce their intake of cholesterol are not deterred from using the reduced-butterfat product by the negative connotations of the term "imitation."

This choice tells us that some people who need to eat less cholesterol look at "imitation" butter and buy it anyway. So these people are already ending up where the author would like everyone to end up: eating reduced-butterfat butter.

This sounds like it weakens the argument. But let's take one more look at that argument:

Quote:
Since the public should be encouraged to eat foods with lower rather than higher butterfat content and since the term “imitation” with its connotations of falsity deters many people from purchasing products so designated, manufactures who wish to give reduced-butterfat butter the more appealing name of “lite butter” should be allowed to do so.

OK, so:

  • The argument tells us up front that the term "imitation" deters many people from buying "imitation" butter.
  • Choice (C) tells us that the term "imitation" fails to deter some people from buying "imitation" butter.

Wait, what? Is choice (C) really telling us anything new? When we read closely, we see that (C) is really just re-phrasing part of the argument that we already know. And the conclusion is pointed at the many people who have been deterred, not some people who haven't been deterred.

If (C) is true, the argument isn't really affected at all. That's why it's a much poorer choice than (E).

On a more personal note, I hope all of this clarification didn't reduce your appetite for delicious, delicious butter. Especially clarified butter. Mmmmmmm, clarified butter...
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac   [#permalink] 25 Oct 2018, 09:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by

When butterfat was considered nutritious and healthful, a law was enac

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne