David nguyen
goobo
sharathnair14
Within the Performance Appraisal process, measuring means determining the level of performance by judging the Quality, Quantity, and Timeliness of the work against a set of standards. Precisely evaluating the efficiency and dedication of employees who spend more than 12 hours at the office is difficult. Presume, for example, most office-goers in Country X are proud of sleepless nights and staying late at the office, thinking that the boss will appreciate their working overtime. What if people waste time during the typical eight-hour workday to create reasons to work overtime such as to claim overtime wages and to look diligent?
The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?A. Office goers are representative of overtime workers in general.
B. Misemploying office-hours is the primary activity of office employees.
C. The performance appraisal process should be ascribed to departments or divisions within an organization, not to individuals.
D. The Quality of work delivered cannot be ignored during the performance appraisal process.
E. The number of hours clocked in at work is relevant to measuring the performance level of employees.
P.S - One of the hardest question stems I've come across. Try to answer in < 2 minutes.
Also, the best explanations will get +1 kudos.
Source -
egmatWhy would the answer not be E here?
I also wonder why E is wrong. If the number of hours clocked in at work is not relevant to measuring the performance level of employees then people did not waste time during the typical eight-hour workday to create reasons to work overtime such as to claim overtime wages and to look diligent. Experts, please help.
I am not an expert, but I try to explain on how did I solve this one.
Question:Objection raised above was based on the doubt of truth of which of following?
Now, what is the objection?
Workers may create reasons (either to get appreciated or to get paid more) to stay in the office, thereby 'faking' their productivity measure.
A. We are not worried about office-goers/overtime workers. We are worried about measuring the productivity.
B. Again, what is effect of 'misemploying as a primary activity'? No link to productivity measure.
C. Out of Scope, because it nullifies performance appraisal as a whole and suggests to apply PA to entity.
D. Quality of work delivered cannot be ignored during the process. Now consider this. Performance Appraisal is calculated based on three things: Quality, Quantity, Timeliness. The objection actually asks this:Wasting time to log in more hours is not justified in PA process. If quality of spent time can be ignored, then the objection raised would be invalid.
E. No. of hours is relevant to the performance. Argument may imply this, but the objection raised was not based on whether no. of hours is related to performance.