| All Reviews > e-GMAT Reviews > Online |
e-GMAT is the world's most reviewed company whose students have delivered 10x more 700+ scores than students from the average GMAT Club Partner. e-GMAT truly understands the test and the test taker and accurately creates personalized GMAT journeys for students, whether they start with a score of 300 or 600, and helps them achieve 740+ on the GMAT.
Created by Four out of the GMAT Club's Top five experts, e-GMAT is a unique combination of proprietary methods in Quant and Verbal. To ensure that you excel on these methods, e-GMATs' xPERT AI personalizes your learning and provides real-time feedback that can quadruple your chances of success and help you save up to 120 hours while preparing.
Finally, e-GMAT also gives you access to strategy experts who will help push your score to 740+ if and when you find yourself stuck below a 700.
Here is what you will get with e-GMAT
Want to experience the e-GMAT difference? Sign-Up for a limited free trial
Strengths:
E-gmat adaptive mocks are excellent—it's truly rare to find practice tests that match the quality and difficulty level of the official ones.
In e-GMAT Scholaranium, I’ve noticed that questions with similar patterns and underlying logic appear multiple times, but framed differently. Encountering these repeatedly without realizing it helped me internalize the thought process. Over time, I learned how to approach such questions intuitively, without relying on memorizing specific concepts or solutions.
Would make the product better:
N/A
I recently scored a 715 on the GMAT (V86, Q90, DI80).
This journey began back in December 2024 with a 665. While that wasn’t a bad score, I knew I could do better. The gap between my Quant (Q86 then → Q90 now) and Verbal (V81) kept bothering me, and my time management across sections was all over the place.
In the early phase, I was randomly solving questions without any structure, and even though I was putting in effort, there was no real absorption or learning happening. I wasn’t analyzing why I got something wrong or what patterns I was missing—so my accuracy stayed inconsistent.
That’s when I enrolled in the Last Mile Push program, and it completely changed my approach. The team helped me build a structured plan for the next one month—practicing topic-wise, refining concepts, focusing on Scholaranium and OG Neuron, and analyzing patterns deeply instead of just solving more questions. This helped me build a strong foundation and boosted my confidence.
One major shift they suggested was changing the sequence of my sections, as they felt it was affecting my performance. This turned out to be a game-changer—I saw my Verbal score jump from 81–82 to 86.
To anyone on this journey:
Use resources like e-GMAT that provide granular data, let that data guide your practice, and work with someone who can help you spot patterns you might miss on your own. The GMAT will challenge you, but the right tools, insights, and support can make all the difference.
REVIEWER IDENTITY VERIFIED by score report [?]
Strengths:
I scored 665 (Q87, V83, DI79) on the GMAT, and what set e-GMAT apart wasn't just the content—it was how the platform showed me exactly where I was losing points and how to fix it. Before e-GMAT, I practiced blindly without understanding which topics drained my time or tanked my accuracy. The moment I started using their portal, everything changed. Data Analytics became my compass—after every practice session, I could see my predicted percentile range, which questions took too long, and which topics needed work. This wasn't generic feedback—it pinpointed that permutation-combination and distance-speed questions were eating up my time. Scholaranium's Cementing Quizzes gave me structured mixed practice with detailed performance tracking, creating a clear roadmap instead of guesswork.
Would make the product better:
The Neuron platform became my secret weapon, especially in my final week. While Scholaranium provided excellent practice, Neuron let me drill official GMAT questions on my exact weak areas with e-GMAT's superior explanations. What made it invaluable was the Error Log—I could revisit every incorrect question before test day, reducing my solve time while improving accuracy. My mentor Dhruv guided me to specific modules for my weak topics, and I'd immediately practice those concepts on Neuron. This targeted cycle—identify weakness through analytics, study the Module content, practice official questions on Neuron, retest—created measurable improvement between each mock attempt.
Sigma-X Mocks deserve special mention because they predicted my score better than official mocks did. While official mocks consistently showed me at 715-735, Sigma-X gave me 675, 665, and 655—and my actual score was 665. They're tougher and more realistic, which initially frustrated me but ultimately prepared me better. The detailed mock analytics revealed surprising patterns: I was getting hard questions right but missing medium ones, showing I needed better time distribution rather than just harder practice. For MSR questions specifically, the DI Module strategies taught me a game-changing approach—read the tab headers first, solve the first question from just the first tab, then read remaining tabs as needed. This saved critical minutes and I got all MSR questions correct on test day.
e-GMAT excels at eliminating wasted effort through precision. You're not redoing topics you've mastered—you're surgically targeting gaps with official questions through Neuron, realistic Sigma-X mocks, mentor guidance that actually understands your data, and analytics that show exactly where to focus next. For anyone who wants to improve strategically rather than study blindly, this platform delivers exactly what score improvement requires.
REVIEWER IDENTITY VERIFIED by score report [?]
Strengths:
Coming from an engineering background, I scored 625 (Q82, V81, DI80) on my
diagnostic—decent, but not enough for my target schools. After researching multiple
platforms, I chose e-GMAT for one critical reason: its ability to identify and fix specific
weaknesses, not just teach concepts. My biggest challenge wasnt learning new
material—it was execution. I had a 60% hard accuracy in Critical Reasoning, careless errors
plaguing my Quant, and no clear path to improvement. I needed a platform that could
diagnose exactly where I was failing and provide surgical solutions.
Would make the product better:
The Quant section was unnecessarily difficult I think. The difficulty level of questions were way too much sometimes. The game-changers: e-GMAT custom quiz feature on Scholaranium and NEURON
question-type filtering transformed my preparation. Instead of grinding through hundreds of
random questions, I practiced with laser focus. Struggling with bold face CR questions? I
create a custom quiz with 10 hard bold face questions only, solve them, immediately review
solutions, and repeat. This targeted approach drove my CR hard accuracy from 60% to 82%.
The error log showed me patterns I couldnt see myself—specific question types where I
consistently failed. Scholaranium filtering let me isolate these exact weaknesses by topic
and difficulty. For Data Insights, where quality resources are scarce, e-GMAT
comprehensive material was sufficient on its own. The data sufficiency questions specifically
forced me to think about edge cases, not just solve mechanically.
The results speak clearly: 715 (Q88, V85, DI84—97th percentile). That's Q82→Q88,
V81→V85, DI80→DI84—a 90-point improvement. But here what sealed my confidence:
Sigma-X mock accuracy. My last two mock scores were 695 and 705. My official score? 715.
That predictive accuracy meant the strategies I developed in practice actually worked on test
day. The solution quality—99.9% of explanations were clear without needing external
help—taught me efficient methods I never considered. The forum feature meant my
questions were already answered. Sectional mocks built stamina without full 2.5-hour
commitments. Last Mile Push mentorship identified strategic gaps I missed. Bottom line: If
youre scoring 600+ and need to reach 700+, e-GMAT provides the diagnostic precision and
targeted practice to eliminate execution errors systematically. Not just content—a complete
improvement system. Highly recommended for anyone willing to practice smart, not just
hard.
Strengths:
Well structured , Dashboard gives clear indication on gaps and what needs to be worked on, email mentor support through out to get best out of product also to keep spirits high.
Would make the product better:
1. Cementing process timelines were way off took me way longer to get to thresholds.
2. All videos on platform should have playback speed control with upto x3 speed option.
Great tool for GMAT prep, its a must have and also must use error log templates. Great mentors , great material , great strategies. Best platform interface out there.
Well structured , Dashboard gives clear indication on gaps and what needs to be worked on, email mentor support through out to get best out of product also to keep spirits high.
1. Cementing process timelines were way off took me way longer to get to thresholds.
2. All videos on platform should have playback speed control with upto x3 speed option.
I had used this tool for over a year now and they keep improving it every few months.
Strengths:
The course provides a well-structured, self-paced learning path with clear video lessons and concept files. Its main strengths are the useful practice tools and sectional tests that help with time management, along with the personalized mentorship which offers helpful advice and strategies.
Would make the product better:
The quality and authenticity of responses on the forum where we ask doubts or follow up questions can be improved.
For my GMAT prep, I chose the eGMAT online course(4 months) and it proved to be a very effective choice for me personally. The course was very structured and allowed me to study at my own pace while following the recommended path.
The basics of all 3 sections were covered with good depth, and I was able to build a solid foundation owing to that. Video lessons and concept files were very clear, and the exercises post each lesson help to understand ways of solving questions as well as to practice the things learned.
The practice tools, especially the sectional tests, were very useful for improving my time management. Consistent practice with the quizzes and sectionals helped me get a better sense of pacing under exam-like conditions. And the analytics provided with those tests helped me identify my weak areas effectively.
Another key component of the course was the personalised mentorship I got from Rashmi, which helped my immensely at various points of my prep. Be it when facing difficulties with certain topics or sections, or needing advice with my behavioural issues during tests, the advice and strategies provided by my mentor were very helpful.
Overall, I'd definitely recommend eGMAT to anyone looking for a comprehensive and well-structured course for their GMAT prep.
The GMAT™ Exam (Graduate Management Admission Test) is a standardized test used for admission to MBA and business master’s programs. It measures analytical writing, integrated reasoning, quantitative reasoning, and verbal reasoning skills. The new GMAT Focus Edition has three sections — Quantitative, Verbal, and Data Insights — and lasts about 2 hours 15 minutes. Scores range from 205 to 805. The test assesses how well you can reason with data and solve complex problems under time pressure. It’s computer-adaptive, meaning question difficulty adjusts based on your performance, providing a personalized and accurate measure of your ability. and a nice man can do hop hop on a bench and can do anc and can do anc
REVIEWER IDENTITY VERIFIED by score report [?]
Strengths:
1. Meticulously designed course content: The course content is thoughtfully designed to flow coherently and to build upon what is taught previously. The PACE feature is especially helpful in saving time, based on granular (and surprisingly accurate) diagnostic tests
2. Rigorous practice and testing modules: The cementing tests (especially for Hard questions) are a good challenge, and the learning curve to get most questions right is steep. Sectional and full-length tests are also valuable resources for practice, and provide an accurate estimate of the current skill level (in line with GMAC's scoring)
3. Hands-on mentor support: Support is available over email, and a response is guaranteed within 1-2 days. Through the LMP programme, mentor support is even more comprehensive, with the mentor also checking in periodically and providing personalised guidance
Would make the product better:
The Personalised Study Plan (PSP) feature can be improved, particularly around the user interface and guidance on usage:
1. UI improvements: Minor UI-UX improvements can be carried out for students to better follow the plan. Sometimes, when the milestones are completed (as per the threshold), the plan does not mark it as complete, and it has to be manually marked as complete --> this is not intuitive for first-time users
2. User handholding/ tutorial: After the plan is generated, a detailed walkthrough of the interface would be helpful. This walkthrough would explain the features of the PSP, and also how the user can proceed through it, modify it, and correct it in case there are (often inevitable) delays
Overall, the e-GMAT intensive online programme is beneficial because it not only provides clear, structured, and streamlined guidance but also focuses on conceptual clarity, building instincts and skills, and targeted assistance.
The practice repository of questions, in the cementing as well as mock stages, is vast, and the difficulty is in line with GMAT's official questions. The Neuron OG feature adds to the existing practice combinations of the Scholaranium to provide more granular practice mechanisms, allowing the user to select specific topics, difficulty levels, and also the allotted time for quizzes or practice.
The solutions to all the questions are detailed and follow a clear structure that aligns closely with the concepts and processes taught in the initial stages, which makes cross-referencing easier. Maintaining an error log is also encouraged, and it is greatly helped by the structure and format of the given solutions.
The analytics provided after every question and after every quiz/ test are also detailed and provide valuable insights, particularly regarding time management and other test-takers' mindsets.
The Last Mile Push (LMP) programme in itself is also particularly noteworthy, as it helps connect with other test-takers and dedicated support personnel, which in turn helps make the whole preparation experience feel less like a solo endeavour. This in itself is valuable, but it also promotes cross-learning from other students, which proves valuable in certain scenarios.
Finally, I want to particularly give a shoutout to Abha from the Strategy team, who patiently guided me through my journey. I consider some of her insights, particularly in improving my Verbal performance, to be the keystone of boosting my confidence and getting a great score.
Strengths:
The Quant section is extremely detailed and provides an excellent range of practice questions.
The higher difficulty level helps train your brain to handle complex problems, making the actual GMAT Quant section feel much easier and more approachable.
Would make the product better:
The overall course flow for Quant could be more structured to guide learners through concepts in a smoother progression.
The Verbal section, particularly the pre-thinking approach, didn’t work well for me. The pre-recorded sessions felt less interactive and not as effective in improving verbal reasoning.
Mentor support felt quite generic — responses often leaned toward “complete the course properly” or similar advice. It sometimes seemed that personalized guidance was reserved for students who had already completed the entire course or were performing strongly. More individualized support could make a big difference for learners who need direction along the way.
This course delivers exceptional value for Quant preparation. The content is comprehensive, and the wide variety of practice questions ensures thorough mastery of key topics. While the higher difficulty level can feel challenging at first, it pays off significantly when facing the actual GMAT, as you develop both confidence and speed. However, the Verbal section and mentoring experience could be improved. The pre-recorded content lacks the engagement and adaptability that live sessions might offer, and the mentor support could be more responsive and tailored to individual learning needs. Overall, I’d still recommend this course for anyone serious about strengthening their Quant foundation, while hoping the Verbal and support aspects evolve to match the same high standard.
Strengths:
According to me e-GMAT is perfect for someone who feels that their quant is good and needs finishing and their verbal is something that they need help with. The Last Mile Program help with exam day strategy, and managing stress and self-doubt.
Would make the product better:
Nothing much, there is a new platform that they have built, so an integration of Scholaranium and Neuron would be good.
The platform is best for non-native speakers. Verbal strategies from Payal are perfect and you can follow them without going anywhere else. In quant there is PACE which helps with cutting down the preparation time by a lot if you are someone who has good grasp on math fundamentals, and if not there are detailed modules on each topic. The quality of hard quant questions is exactly like actual exam. If you are confused about how to approach DI, then there is step-by-step detailed modules on each sub-topic and how to approach each type of question. There is a huge question bank for DI with proper explanations. There is a dedicated forum for each question and you can interact with Subject matter experts if you are not able to understand certain solution or you have a better way to solve a questions and you want to confirm your approach. The response time to your forum questions is less than 24hrs.
They are constantly evolving their course offering. Leveraging AI on products like Neuron where you can basically create parallel questions to solidify your learnings. There is last mile program where you get to interact with a mentor who help you with those finishing touches in your preparation. In a nut-shell it is best of both worlds, self pace learning and that human touch or mentorship you need sometimes to understand things better.
Joined: Jul 23, 2025
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Verified GMAT Focus score:
695 Q86 V83 DI85 (Online)
Strengths:
I was very unconsistent on verbal section especially CR.
The e-gmat last mile push program provided me the right consistency to face the exam without being too scared.
Would make the product better:
Some solutions of non-official questions are imprecise.
Improvement from 635 to 695 in 2 months, but the time is not all. Just take the time you need and don't rush into anxiety.
Verbal improvement from V76 to V83 - the course heled me to build the foundation I didn't have. I was able to read but I struggle a lot to elaborate the information in a short time and to get the right answer.
Through this course I firstly managed to understand how to read (READING STRATEGY) and after that I learned a process to answer the gmat questions correctly (PRE THINKING PROCESS).
Let's rememeber to keep an error log to track your errors and as consequence your progress.
Cementing quizzes helped me to assess my ability and to build test taking skills where I was lacking.
Quality of questions and solutions on the scholaranium was generally very hard and good (with few exceptions), but training on hard stuff is good for having a smoother exam.
Last Mile Push program: the tutor was very severe but always available and provided great quality to my work.