Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jul 1010:00 AM IST
-11:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.
Jul 1012:00 PM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
50% off all study plans with code PROGRESS - Expires Monday 7/13
Jul 0608:00 AM PDT
-05:00 PM PDT
Compete to win some amazing Prizes such as Admissions Consulting Packages, Courses, and more. This is your Best Opportunity to improve your GMAT Score! Register to Participate
Jul 0810:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Receive 2 FREE hours of tutoring when you enroll in a 655+ course
Jul 1209:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EDT
Increase your score with a powerful GMAT course taught live online + 6 months of access to TTP OnDemand GMAT Masterclass included! Sundays July 12, 2026-October 1, 2026, 9:30am-12:30pm EST.- Jul 12
11:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Join us in a GMAT practice session and solve 25 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
07 Dec 2019, 19:18
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi mimishyu,
Since this discussion is spread over several posts in this thread, I'm going to consolidate all of the relevant information here:
Based on the table (and the description above it), we can deduce that some people in this survey responded to MORE than one category. Here's why:
1) If you add up all of the percentages in the first column, you end up with a total of 110%. That would not happen if each person chose just one reason. Thus, some of those people chose 2 (or more) reasons.
2) The text above the survey states that the survey "...was designed to help determine what respondents see as the potential BENEFITS of adding a website". The word "benefits" is plural; if each person chose just ONE option, then the wording would have stated "...was designed to help determine what respondents see as the potential BENEFIT (singular) of adding a website".
Thus, while we don't know which people chose more than one option from the list, we do know that some of them did.
Question 2 from the set of 3 focuses on a COMPARISON: is one number (PMS) less than 25% of another number (ECB). Your calculations here are correct; we have....
Preserve Market Share(PMS) : 28 Respondents
Expand Customer Base (ECB): 30 Respondents
In simple terms, is 28 less than 30? YES - it clearly is. This does not change regardless of the number of people who are in "both" groups because the overall totals (28 and 30) will still be the same. You are given EXACT data/numbers to work with here, and no 'hypothetical' situation changes those numbers.
Even if you did not do that math though, you can still determine that Question 2 can be inferred based on the percents in each column of the table:
-In the Latino column...what is 25% of 26%? It's 6.5%...Is PMS less than ECB?... is 6% less than 6.5%?.....YES
-In the African American column...what is 25% of 29%? It's 7.25%...Is PMS less than ECB?.....is 6% less than 7.25%....YES
-In the Asian American column...what is 25% of 25%? It's 6.25%....Is PMS less than ECB?.....is 4% less than 6.25%....YES
-In the Native American column...what is 25% of 25%? It's 6.25%....Is PMS less than ECB?....is 6% less than 6.25%....YES
Since each individual column gives us a 'YES' result, summing up all of those numbers would also give us a "YES" result (we'd just be dealing with one big calculation instead of four smaller ones.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Since this discussion is spread over several posts in this thread, I'm going to consolidate all of the relevant information here:
Based on the table (and the description above it), we can deduce that some people in this survey responded to MORE than one category. Here's why:
1) If you add up all of the percentages in the first column, you end up with a total of 110%. That would not happen if each person chose just one reason. Thus, some of those people chose 2 (or more) reasons.
2) The text above the survey states that the survey "...was designed to help determine what respondents see as the potential BENEFITS of adding a website". The word "benefits" is plural; if each person chose just ONE option, then the wording would have stated "...was designed to help determine what respondents see as the potential BENEFIT (singular) of adding a website".
Thus, while we don't know which people chose more than one option from the list, we do know that some of them did.
Question 2 from the set of 3 focuses on a COMPARISON: is one number (PMS) less than 25% of another number (ECB). Your calculations here are correct; we have....
Preserve Market Share(PMS) : 28 Respondents
Expand Customer Base (ECB): 30 Respondents
In simple terms, is 28 less than 30? YES - it clearly is. This does not change regardless of the number of people who are in "both" groups because the overall totals (28 and 30) will still be the same. You are given EXACT data/numbers to work with here, and no 'hypothetical' situation changes those numbers.
Even if you did not do that math though, you can still determine that Question 2 can be inferred based on the percents in each column of the table:
-In the Latino column...what is 25% of 26%? It's 6.5%...Is PMS less than ECB?... is 6% less than 6.5%?.....YES
-In the African American column...what is 25% of 29%? It's 7.25%...Is PMS less than ECB?.....is 6% less than 7.25%....YES
-In the Asian American column...what is 25% of 25%? It's 6.25%....Is PMS less than ECB?.....is 4% less than 6.25%....YES
-In the Native American column...what is 25% of 25%? It's 6.25%....Is PMS less than ECB?....is 6% less than 6.25%....YES
Since each individual column gives us a 'YES' result, summing up all of those numbers would also give us a "YES" result (we'd just be dealing with one big calculation instead of four smaller ones.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
06 Jul 2021, 17:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
lakshya14
In integrated reasoning, for something to be "inferred," it must be true. For example, if you can find a true or false answer for a question, if the answer is false, it is not inferrable. IR inference and DS differ in this way.
