GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Oct 2018, 08:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1314
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2018, 01:57
1
13
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

72% (00:48) correct 28% (00:54) wrong based on 604 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

GMAT® Official Guide Verbal Review 2019

Practice Question
Question No.: SC
OG Code : SC01600

A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized file to permit law-enforcement agencies to track people under criminal investigation but have not yet been charged.

(A) under criminal investigation but

(B) under criminal investigation, but who

(C) under criminal investigation, but they

(D) who are under criminal investigation, but they

(E) who are under criminal investigation but

https://www.nytimes.com/1987/06/11/nyregion/news-summary-thursday-june-11-1987.html
https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1987/06/11/383287.html
https://www.nytimes.com/1987/06/11/us/crime-panel-backs-broad-expansion-of-computer-file.html

A national computerized file would be expanded to permit law-enforcement agencies to track people under criminal investigation but have not been charged, under a tentative decision by a Federal advisory panel.

A Federal advisory committee has tentatively endorsed a major expansion of a national computer file that would permit Federal, state and local law-enforcement agencies to exchange information on people who are suspected of a crime but have not been charged.

_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Posts: 131
Re: A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2018, 04:56
1
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized file to permit law-enforcement agencies to track people under criminal investigation but have not yet been charged.

A. under criminal investigation but --> not parallel with "have not yet been charged "

B. under criminal investigation, but who --> same as A

C. under criminal investigation, but they --> same as A

D. who are under criminal investigation, but they --> not parallel

E. who are under criminal investigation but --> correct
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Posts: 131
Re: A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2018, 05:08
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized file to permit law-enforcement agencies to track people under criminal investigation but have not yet been charged.

A. under criminal investigation but --> not parallel with "have not yet been charged "

B. under criminal investigation, but who --> same as A

C. under criminal investigation, but they --> same as A

D. who are under criminal investigation, but they --> not parallel

E. who are under criminal investigation but --> correct
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Posts: 374
Re: A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2018, 05:18
1
A. under criminal investigation but - what follows but seems to be ambiguous as we don't know who has not been charged - federal government or people ??

B. under criminal investigation, ((but who)) - incorrect structure + ambiguity of "who".

C. under criminal investigation, but ((they)) - incorrect.

D. who are under criminal investigation, ((but they)) - incorrect.

E. who are under criminal investigation but - brings out the correct meaning by using who before the underlined part so as to convey that both the parts are about people. Thus, ambiguity is removed and correct meaning is conveyed.

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 14 Dec 2017
Posts: 503
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2018, 05:20
1
hazelnut wrote:
SC01600
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized file to permit law-enforcement agencies to track people under criminal investigation but have not yet been charged.

A. under criminal investigation but

B. under criminal investigation, but who

C. under criminal investigation, but they

D. who are under criminal investigation, but they

E. who are under criminal investigation but


I think E is correct.

Who - is required after "people" as an essential modifier, since it is necessary to emphasize that it is a specific set of people "under criminal investigation"

Who are....but have... seems parallel.

E looks good.

Thanks,
GyM
_________________

New to GMAT Club - https://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-gmat-club-need-help-271131.html#p2098335

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 26 Dec 2017
Posts: 152
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2018, 06:39
hazelnut wrote:
SC01600
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized file to permit law-enforcement agencies to track people under criminal investigation but have not yet been charged.

A. under criminal investigation but

B. under criminal investigation, but who

C. under criminal investigation, but they

D. who are under criminal investigation, but they

E. who are under criminal investigation but


E is correct as it exactly replicates intended meaning.
_________________

--If you like my post pls give kudos

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 29 Dec 2017
Posts: 390
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.25
WE: Marketing (Telecommunications)
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2018, 14:09
Hi folks!

As you can see, the text of the original NYT article is different from GMAT OA. This is one more proof that if you want to learn GMAT's SC logic, don't read NYT, instead read WSJ, especially headline articles, because the rest have lower quality too.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 383
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2018, 12:31
Why D is wrong. "They" can refer to people who are under criminal investigation
Study Buddy Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1210
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Premium Member CAT Tests
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2018, 20:35
1
ammuseeru

0:30 solution, although as in quant you really need to practice to train your mind
to understand small chunks of the sentence as you read along, and then separate different clauses.

A federal advisory panel proposes

expanding a national computerized file to permit law-enforcement agencies
to track people under criminal investigation
but have not yet been charged.

Intended meaning:
FA panel proposes to expand something to do a particular task.
something: a national computerized file
task: permit law-enforcement agencies

What will these agencies do?
Track people under criminal investigation but have not yet been charged.

Key parallel marker BUT. We are talking about two qualities of people:
1. They are tracked under criminal investigation
2. They have not been charged in past.

Could you see how parallel marker correctly connects both verbs (tracked and charged)
with subject people.

There is no need for introducing a separate subject they as in (D)

As generis pointed out here, make pronoun ambiguity your last hope when you have better chances
striking off answer choices with other rules .
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 39
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GPA: 2.61
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
CAT Tests
Re: A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2018, 22:10
GMATNinja or anyone else feel free to correct my analysis:
(A) Parallelism Error:
Form: X BUT Y
Subject: People
X Element: "under criminal investigation" is a prepositional phrase
Y Element: "have not yet been charged" phrase that starts with a verb, but does not contain a subject

(B) Parallelism error (similar to A)
The addition of who corrects the missing Subject the Y element, but we need a form of be (is/was/are/am/be) with "under" as "under" starts a prepositional phrase
We can also eliminate (C) for the same reasons.

(D) who are under criminal investigation, but they
"who are under" - relative pronoun "who" is connected to form of be. Why is this correct? well it can connect with the non-underlined verb in the Y element of the parallelism marker
And, we can clearly see that the antecedent of "who" is "people".

But, "they" forms an independent clause. This is incorrect.
Rule: A relative clause (a clause beginning with a relative pronoun such as that, who, whom, which, whose) is never parallel to an independent clause
Eliminate D

(E) the relative clause "who" has a clear antecedent.
The relative pronoun "who" clearly introduces two parallel verbal phrases that are coordinated by the one-word marker, "but"
"they" is removed, eliminating the previous independent clause error in D
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 28 May 2018
Posts: 63
Re: A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2018, 00:01
adkikani
Can u check if my reasoning for eliminating D.

D. who are under criminal investigation, but they : "but" is trying to connect 2 IC so it is correct. But "they" can refer to agencies or people. So eliminate it.
Study Buddy Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1210
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Premium Member CAT Tests
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2018, 08:15
guptakashish02

Quote:
Can u check if my reasoning for eliminating D.

Where is the verb in above sentence? ;)
Would this be more apt:
Can u check if my reasoning for eliminating D is correct


Quote:
D. who are under criminal investigation, but they : "but" is trying to connect 2 IC so it is correct. But "they" can refer to agencies or people. So eliminate it.


I would stick to my earlier explanation of eliminating D based on parallelism issue rather than thinking about pronouns. I personally see no reason to substitute them with agencies. It just does not make sense.
Maybe veterans such as generis aragonn VeritasKarishma sudarshan22 can add more cents.

Happy study prep!
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

GMAT Club Bot
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized &nbs [#permalink] 15 Oct 2018, 08:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron
Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.