Last visit was: 15 Jun 2025, 11:55 It is currently 15 Jun 2025, 11:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Modifiers|               
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,147
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
136
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 14 Jun 2025
Posts: 2,924
Own Kudos:
8,336
 [51]
Given Kudos: 57
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 2,924
Kudos: 8,336
 [51]
28
Kudos
Add Kudos
23
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dcummins
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 09 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,069
Own Kudos:
2,279
 [26]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
19
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
hiranmay
Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Last visit: 22 Jun 2024
Posts: 460
Own Kudos:
556
 [6]
Given Kudos: 84
Posts: 460
Kudos: 556
 [6]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized file to permit law-enforcement agencies to track people under criminal investigation but have not yet been charged.

A. under criminal investigation but --> not parallel with "have not yet been charged "

B. under criminal investigation, but who --> same as A

C. under criminal investigation, but they --> same as A

D. who are under criminal investigation, but they --> not parallel

E. who are under criminal investigation but --> correct
User avatar
SonalSinha803
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Last visit: 18 Feb 2019
Posts: 307
Own Kudos:
309
 [5]
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 307
Kudos: 309
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. under criminal investigation but - what follows but seems to be ambiguous as we don't know who has not been charged - federal government or people ??

B. under criminal investigation, ((but who)) - incorrect structure + ambiguity of "who".

C. under criminal investigation, but ((they)) - incorrect.

D. who are under criminal investigation, ((but they)) - incorrect.

E. who are under criminal investigation but - brings out the correct meaning by using who before the underlined part so as to convey that both the parts are about people. Thus, ambiguity is removed and correct meaning is conveyed.

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
torto
Joined: 18 Sep 2016
Last visit: 01 Feb 2022
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
44
 [2]
Given Kudos: 409
Posts: 27
Kudos: 44
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Expert,

I am a little confused about who here.

What is the difference between "people under criminal investigation" and "people who are under criminal investigation". Which is correct.

What is the concept tested here? Where can I read about it more?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 14 Jun 2025
Posts: 2,924
Own Kudos:
8,336
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 2,924
Kudos: 8,336
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I also must take a moment to jump to the New York Times's defense. Although they certainly do make errors, this was one of transcription, as the three versions originally cited make clear. The original article is written correctly, and it's only the digital archive version that gets it wrong. You're still much better off with the NYT than with the WSJ, especially given the latter's limited focus.
avatar
Mansi89
Joined: 29 Jul 2018
Last visit: 21 Oct 2020
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 71
Posts: 36
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Don’t we have to use who both the sides? If I remember correctly in Manhattan sc it’s clearly written that we have to use where who etc in all comparative forms.. am I wrong?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 15 Jun 2025
Posts: 3,861
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 158
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,861
Kudos: 3,570
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mansi89
Don’t we have to use who both the sides? If I remember correctly in Manhattan sc it’s clearly written that we have to use where who etc in all comparative forms.. am I wrong?

Posted from my mobile device
Hi Mansi89, while I am not sure about the exact context in which Manhattan sc says so, I would say that but is more of a contrast indicator than a comparison indicator.

Also, I address the repetition of a relative pronoun (who in this case) here.
User avatar
RK007
Joined: 09 Nov 2018
Last visit: 27 Feb 2020
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 222
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
Posts: 65
Kudos: 47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why is B wrong? I don't get the difference between B and E. Can someone please explain?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Jun 2025
Posts: 7,325
Own Kudos:
68,237
 [19]
Given Kudos: 1,943
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,325
Kudos: 68,237
 [19]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RK007
Why is B wrong? I don't get the difference between B and E. Can someone please explain?
This is a parallelism issue. Let's start with choice (E):

Quote:
(E) A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized file to permit law-enforcement agencies to track people who are under criminal investigation but have not yet been charged.
The parallel list boils down to: "... people who (1) are under criminal investigation but (2) have not yet been charged." We are using "but" instead of "and", but the parallelism rules are the same. Note that both (1) and (2) start with verbs and logically follow "people who...":

  • "... people who (1) are under criminal investigation"
  • "... people who (2) have not yet been charged"

Quote:
(B) A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized file to permit law-enforcement agencies to track people under criminal investigation, but who have not yet been charged.
The parallelism breaks down in choice (B): "... people (1) under criminal investigation, but (2) who have not yet been charged." The first item in the list begins with a preposition ("under"), while the second item begins with a noun modifier ("who"). These two things are not parallel.

And we cannot view the ", but" as a coordinating conjunction, since it does not link two complete thoughts ("Who have not yet been charged" is not a standalone sentence). Either way, (B) doesn't work.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
aishu0091
Joined: 28 Jul 2020
Last visit: 16 Nov 2023
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Posts: 70
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized file to permit law-enforcement agencies to track people under criminal investigation but have not yet been charged.

(A) under criminal investigation but : no parallelism with have not been charged

(B) under criminal investigation, but who : no parallelism with have not been charged

(C) under criminal investigation, but they: no parallelism with have not been charged

(D) who are under criminal investigation, but they: people who are under criminal investigation, but they who have not been charged.

(E) who are under criminal investigation but: perfect parallelism. people who are under... but who have not been...
User avatar
Sneha2021
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 525
Location: India
Posts: 319
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB GMATNinja

Why "but" cannot be a coordinating conjunction in C & D?
(D) who are under criminal investigation, but they

A federal....people under investigation(IC), but they (IC)

"They" must refer to federal acc to structure but it is plural so only single referent for "they" is people. Therefore I did not find it ambiguous. Please help me to reject C & D.

Thank you for your help :)
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 15 June 2025
Posts: 4,694
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,792
Posts: 4,694
Kudos: 35,951
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The tracking is for people, not the agencies.

IF you have, but they -------they is clearly ambiguous.


I eat pizza in the table, but it ..........the table or pizza does it refer to ?

here the problem is NOT about CC but rather of the entire meaning
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 14 Jun 2025
Posts: 4,597
Own Kudos:
32,272
 [1]
Given Kudos: 683
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,597
Kudos: 32,272
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
KarishmaB GMATNinja

Why "but" cannot be a coordinating conjunction in C & D?
(D) who are under criminal investigation, but they

A federal....people under investigation(IC), but they (IC)

"They" must refer to federal acc to structure but it is plural so only single referent for "they" is people. Therefore I did not find it ambiguous. Please help me to reject C & D.

Thank you for your help :)


Hello Sneha2021,

Although your question is not for me, here are my two cents. :)

When we have a structure in which the clause after the coordinating conjunction starts with a pronoun, the subject pronoun tends to refer to the subject noun in the preceding clause. In that case, the plural pronoun "they" refers to the subject of the preceding clause, "A federal advisory panel". Certainly, this reference is illogical. Therefore, the structures in Choices C and D do not work.

Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 15 Jun 2025
Posts: 16,046
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 472
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,046
Kudos: 73,683
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
KarishmaB GMATNinja

Why "but" cannot be a coordinating conjunction in C & D?
(D) who are under criminal investigation, but they

A federal....people under investigation(IC), but they (IC)

"They" must refer to federal acc to structure but it is plural so only single referent for "they" is people. Therefore I did not find it ambiguous. Please help me to reject C & D.

Thank you for your help :)

It can be a subordinating clause but what is your main clause?

A panel proposes allowing agencies to track people who are under criminal investigation, but they have not yet been charged.

The subordinate clause links up to the main clause. Who is 'they' here? Also we are talking about what the panel is proposing. What does it mean when we say 'they have not yet been charged'? In no way does it link to 'who are under criminal investigation.' That is an essential relative clause modifying people in the main clause and it got over when the subordinate clause started. The subordinate clause must talk about the panel and its proposal to make sense now.

If we are to continue the essential relative clause, we should not use a comma before 'but' and 'but' should join verb phrases (with the same subject 'who')
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Jun 2025
Posts: 7,325
Own Kudos:
68,237
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,943
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,325
Kudos: 68,237
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
KarishmaB GMATNinja

Why "but" cannot be a coordinating conjunction in C & D?
(D) who are under criminal investigation, but they

A federal....people under investigation(IC), but they (IC)

"They" must refer to federal acc to structure but it is plural so only single referent for "they" is people. Therefore I did not find it ambiguous. Please help me to reject C & D.

Thank you for your help :)
The issue is logic, not ambiguity.

Because we have an independent clause following "but" in (C) and (D), we'd expect a contrast between the first independent clause and the second.

This gives us the following construction:

Quote:
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized file..., BUT they have not yet been charged.
The portions in red and blue don't seem to have any logical relation at all. Why would it be surprising that people haven't been charged in light of the fact that an advisory panel wants to expand some computer file?

However, in (E), we don't have an independent clause after the "but." Instead, we have the verb phrase, "have not yet been charged." This very phrase must be parallel to another verb phrase.

Take another look at the relevant portion:

Quote:
People who are under criminal investigation but have not yet been charged.
Now the portions in red and blue are two verb phrases that have a logical connection. Even though these people are under investigation, they haven't been charged. This makes way more sense.

So, you're right. (C) and (D) aren't wrong because they contain an ambiguous pronoun. They're wrong because they contain two parallel independent clauses that create a nonsensical meaning, and (E) fixes the problem by creating parallelism between two related verb phrases instead.

I hope that clears things up!
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 16 May 2025
Posts: 5,130
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,130
Kudos: 4,722
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
BillyZ
GMAT® Official Guide Verbal Review 2019

Practice Question
Question No.: SC
OG Code : SC01600
A federal advisory panel proposes expanding a national computerized file to permit law-enforcement agencies to track people under criminal investigation but have not yet been charged.

(A) under criminal investigation but

(B) under criminal investigation, but who

(C) under criminal investigation, but they

(D) who are under criminal investigation, but they

(E) who are under criminal investigation but


Concepts tested here: Parallelism + Awkwardness/Redundancy

• Any elements linked by a conjunction ("but" in this case) must be parallel.

A:
1/ This answer choice fails to maintain parallelism between "under criminal investigation" and "have not yet been charged"; remember, any elements linked by a conjunction ("but" in this case) must be parallel.

B:
1/ This answer choice fails to maintain parallelism between "under criminal investigation" and "who have not yet been charged"; remember, any elements linked by a conjunction ("but" in this case) must be parallel.

C:
1/ This answer choice fails to maintain parallelism between "under criminal investigation" and "they have not yet been charged"; remember, any elements linked by a conjunction ("but" in this case) must be parallel.

D:
1/ This answer choice fails to maintain parallelism between "who are under criminal investigation" and "they have not yet been charged"; remember, any elements linked by a conjunction ("but" in this case) must be parallel.

E:
1/ This answer choice correctly maintains parallelism between "are under criminal investigation" and "have not yet been charged".

Hence, E is the best answer choice.

All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7325 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts