sjuniv32
AnthonyRitz,
MentorTutoring,
GMATNinja,
DmitryFarber,
VeritasKarishmaTo answer this question, experts said the correct idiom is "A is to B what X is to Y."
I would know from the native speakers that is it a common idiom for you, and what resource you learned the idiom from for the first time?
Could please give a few sentence example with the idiom above?
Would you please recommend a source that could help to master gmat idioms?
Kudos to the experts in advance investing their time to help learners and change their lives!!!
Hello,
sjuniv32. If you are getting caught up on
what, it may help to think of this idiom in reverse, as in,
What Babe Ruth is to baseball, Pelé is to football. In fact, you can almost see how, in this order, the second item of the comparison can take on a matching
what, and the sentence is merely holding two clauses in parallel:
What Babe Ruth is to baseball [is what] Pelé is to football. To be clear, this is
not a common idiom, but someone who has grown up in a predominantly English-speaking area will probably have come across it by the time he or she finishes college. Because I acquired knowledge of this idiom at some point in my lifetime in such an organic manner, I cannot pinpoint when or from what source I first encountered it. You may want to try a dedicated GMAT™ SC guide, such as those by
Manhattan Prep or Veritas Prep, for a more thorough discussion of GMAT™-specific idioms, or you could simply create your own list as you go through a copy of an OG. You could even search for questions in the forum that are tagged under
Idioms to see what you find. There are tens of thousands of idioms in the English language, and it would be a waste of your time to attempt to memorize even one percent of them. You just want to learn the ones that GMAC™ considers important enough to put on the test.
In this particular question, the far more useful—i.e. more commonly tested—concept to understand is the difference between attributing the appositive phase to a person or to a possessive that includes the name of the person. Within seconds, I was down to (D) or (E), and the idiom did, in fact, tilt the balance in favor of (E). But even if you were unsure, you could look at the tail-end of the other answer choices and ask yourself what separates
what, which appears twice,
like,
just as (would the
just be necessary, for instance?), and
similar to. If you could reach a 50/50 proposition on a Hard question with certainty in a matter of seconds, that would not be a bad start, right?
- Andrew