GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 26 Jan 2020, 08:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Posts: 115
A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2011, 17:14
21
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

26% (02:05) correct 74% (01:50) wrong based on 166 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?

(1) m = p + 2

(2) m = 3p

I didn't get this question though got the answer right
What exactly does reflection mean?
GMAT Tutor
Status: Tutor - BrushMyQuant
Joined: 05 Apr 2011
Posts: 635
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: XLRI (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
GPA: 3
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the li  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 02 Oct 2012, 19:57
7
4
A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?

(1) m = p + 2

(2) m = 3p

When a line is reflected around y=x then the equation of the reflected line is got by swapping the x and y of the original equation.
So, equation of the reflection of the line y=px + q will be x = py + q

So, for this line to be parallel to y = mx + n we just need to make sure that the slope of the two lines are equal
i.e. 1/p = m

STAT1
m = p + 2
But we cannot say whether m=1/p will be true or not. Proof is below.
Trying m =1/p
we get
1/p = p + 2
p^2 + 2p - 1 =0
p = { -2 +- sqrt(4 + 4) }/2 = { -2 + 4sqrt2 } /2
But there can be many other values of p for which m = p+2 will be true but m = 1/p will not be true.
So, INSUFFICIENT

STAT2
m = 3p
But we cannot say whether m=1/p will be true or not. Proof is below.
Trying m = 1/p
1/p = 3p
=> p^2 = 1/3
But there can be many other values of p for which m = p+2 will be true but m = 1/p will not be true.
So, INSUFFICIENT

Taking both together we have
m = p+2 and m=3p
=> 3p = p+2
=> p = 1

So, m = p+2 = 3
And 1/p = 1
Clearly m is not equal to 1/p. So, lines are not parallel.

Hope it helps!
_________________

Originally posted by BrushMyQuant on 02 Oct 2012, 19:13.
Last edited by BrushMyQuant on 02 Oct 2012, 19:57, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 03 Mar 2011
Posts: 70
Location: United States
Schools: Erasmus (S)
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.9

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2011, 00:10
12
1
Any monotonous function f(x) which is reflected over the line y=x becomes the function g(x) which is the inverse to f(x). This means f(g(y))=y for all y from the domain and g(f(x))=x for all x from the domain. In case of linear function it is very easy to find the inserve just by changing y to x and x to y.
In our case the inverse x=py+q
y=x/p-q/p

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_function

If this reflection is paralle to the line y=mx+n, then the slope of two lines are equal, therefore m=1/p. So, finally the question asks whether m=1/p.

(1) says m=p+2, which means that m=1/p only for some particular values of p, so we could not conclude whether the lines are parallel
(2) says m=3p, which means that m=1/p only for some particular values of p, so we could not conclude whether the lines are parallel

(1) and (2) gives us the system
m=p+2
m=3p

from which p+2=3p
p=1 and m=2+1=3

As we could see, m is not equal to 1/p, so these lines are not parallel. Only both statements together are sufficient for the answer.

##### General Discussion
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 631

### Show Tags

Updated on: 21 Mar 2011, 00:12
S1) insufficient. Slopes are unknown
S2) insufficient
Consider line m to be inclined 60 deg to x axis and line p to be inclined 30 deg to x axis. The reflection of line p about y=x is parallel to line m. The answer to the question is yes.
Consider line m and line p to be parallel to x axis. The reflection of line p about x=y is not prallel to the line m. The answer to the question is no

1) + 2) sufficient
The slopes of the lines are known m=3 and p=1. we can know the angle each line makes with the x axis. And know for sure whether the reflection of line p is symmetrical about the x=y. This can be definitely answered. Sufficient. Hence C

Posted from my mobile device

Originally posted by gmat1220 on 20 Mar 2011, 23:38.
Last edited by gmat1220 on 21 Mar 2011, 00:12, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 631

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2011, 00:15
@bagrettin pls verify my reasoning. Thanks for confirming the answer

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 03 Mar 2011
Posts: 70
Location: United States
Schools: Erasmus (S)
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.9

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2011, 01:21
1
Hello, gmat1220

In S1. Just to be more precise, let say that correspondence between slopes p and p+2 are different for the different values of p, therefore the answer on the question will be different too (for exact equation, linking inverse function see my post)

In S2 your example with 60 and 30 degrees corresponds to m=3p. The line which is inclined 60 degrees to x axis has the slope of 3^0.5 (tg 60), while the line with 30 degrees to x axis has the slope 1/3^0.5 (tg 30), so m=3p. Again since y=x is inclined at 45 degrees to Ox, this lines are symmetrical to the y=x.

If both lines have the slope of 0, then m=3p, while the reflection will be vertical line with the slope equal to infinity.
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 631

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2011, 07:20
Hello bagrettin
Your explanation rocks!!!!! Thanks so much.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 03 Mar 2011
Posts: 70
Location: United States
Schools: Erasmus (S)
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.9

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2011, 13:03
Hello, gmat1220!

Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Posts: 115

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2011, 16:21
Great explanation bagrettin !
Thanks to gmat1220 also.
Intern
Joined: 16 Sep 2011
Posts: 1

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2011, 04:45
The explanation is indeed splendid I was searching for some more on equations of line when I found this link on tutorvista which was a great help i think you should also check it out.
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 316
A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the li  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2012, 01:19
A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?

(1) m = p + 2

(2) m = 3p

I know this question has been discussed earlier..bt that discussion didnt help me out..thats y have made new topic....
_________________
Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 277
Re: A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the li  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2012, 20:33
@nktdotgupta - Thx for the explanation but i've another question on this.
What if -
1. A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = 2x, How shall we approach this question?
2. A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = 5, How shall we approach this question?
_________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GMAT Tutor
Status: Tutor - BrushMyQuant
Joined: 05 Apr 2011
Posts: 635
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: XLRI (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
GPA: 3
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the li  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2012, 21:40
1
2
Hi,

To find the equation of the reflected line just keep in mind the following things:--

1. Each and every point on the reflected line has the same distance from the line on which the reflection happened as the corresponding point on the original line.
2. The line on which reflection happens is the perpendicular bisector of the line joining a point on the original line and the corresponding point on the reflected line.

So, to find the equation of the reflected line you need to find two points.
One point you can get by finding the point of intersection of the original line and the line on which the reflection happened.
To find the other point you can take any point on the original line and drop a perpendicular to the line on which reflection has to happen. And find the point of the intersection of the line on which the reflection has to happen and the perpendicular drawn just now.
Now, the point of intersection which we got just now is the mid point of the point on the original line and the point on the reflected line. So, we can find the point on the reflected line too.

Will give an example : ( Figure attached )
Suppose we are given the equation of line l and we have to find the reflection of l on line m
line n is the reflected line whose equation we need to find.
We can find one point (O) by solving for lines l and m
Now to find one more point on line n (C(x2,y2)):
Take a point A(x,y) on line l and draw a perpendicular to line m (point B)
Now , we know the slope of line m so we can find the slope of any line perpendicular to line m and we have one point (A) through which that perpendicular is passing so we can find equation of that perpendicular and hence we can find point B (x1, y1)
Since, B is the midpoint of AC (since the line on which reflection happens is the perpendicular bisector of any two corresponding lines on the original and the reflected line)
So,
x1 = (x+ x2) /2
and
y1 = (y + y2)/2
So, we can find x2,y2 and hence point C
Once we have point C then we can find equation of line n as we have two point O and C

What if -
1. A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = 2x, How shall we approach this question?
2. A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = 5, How shall we approach this question?

For the 1st one i will go with the approach mentioned above.
For the second one since the line is y=5. So the X co-ordinate of the corresponding point on the reflected line will remain same but for finding the y co-ordinate i will follow the procedure mentioned above.

Hope it helps!
Attachments

File comment: File attached

image.JPG [ 14.48 KiB | Viewed 9099 times ]

_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 316
Re: A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the li  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2012, 23:34
Thanks alot..!!

i got it now..!
_________________
Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !
SVP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1521
Concentration: Finance
Re: A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the li  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2013, 09:22
nktdotgupta wrote:
A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?

(1) m = p + 2

(2) m = 3p

When a line is reflected around y=x then the equation of the reflected line is got by swapping the x and y of the original equation.
So, equation of the reflection of the line y=px + q will be x = py + q

So, for this line to be parallel to y = mx + n we just need to make sure that the slope of the two lines are equal
i.e. 1/p = m

STAT1
m = p + 2
But we cannot say whether m=1/p will be true or not. Proof is below.
Trying m =1/p
we get
1/p = p + 2
p^2 + 2p - 1 =0
p = { -2 +- sqrt(4 + 4) }/2 = { -2 + 4sqrt2 } /2
But there can be many other values of p for which m = p+2 will be true but m = 1/p will not be true.
So, INSUFFICIENT

STAT2
m = 3p
But we cannot say whether m=1/p will be true or not. Proof is below.
Trying m = 1/p
1/p = 3p
=> p^2 = 1/3
But there can be many other values of p for which m = p+2 will be true but m = 1/p will not be true.
So, INSUFFICIENT

Taking both together we have
m = p+2 and m=3p
=> 3p = p+2
=> p = 1

So, m = p+2 = 3
And 1/p = 1
Clearly m is not equal to 1/p. So, lines are not parallel.

Hope it helps!

You say that for two lines to be parallel their product should be 1.
I don't get it, I thought that for two lines to be parallel they had to have the same slope.
So in this case m = p

Thanks
Cheers
J
Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 648
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
Re: A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the li  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2013, 03:56
jlgdr wrote:
nktdotgupta wrote:
A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?

(1) m = p + 2

(2) m = 3p

When a line is reflected around y=x then the equation of the reflected line is got by swapping the x and y of the original equation.
So, equation of the reflection of the line y=px + q will be x = py + q

So, for this line to be parallel to y = mx + n we just need to make sure that the slope of the two lines are equal
i.e. 1/p = m

STAT1
m = p + 2
But we cannot say whether m=1/p will be true or not. Proof is below.
Trying m =1/p
we get
1/p = p + 2
p^2 + 2p - 1 =0
p = { -2 +- sqrt(4 + 4) }/2 = { -2 + 4sqrt2 } /2
But there can be many other values of p for which m = p+2 will be true but m = 1/p will not be true.
So, INSUFFICIENT

STAT2
m = 3p
But we cannot say whether m=1/p will be true or not. Proof is below.
Trying m = 1/p
1/p = 3p
=> p^2 = 1/3
But there can be many other values of p for which m = p+2 will be true but m = 1/p will not be true.
So, INSUFFICIENT

Taking both together we have
m = p+2 and m=3p
=> 3p = p+2
=> p = 1

So, m = p+2 = 3
And 1/p = 1
Clearly m is not equal to 1/p. So, lines are not parallel.

Hope it helps!

You say that for two lines to be parallel their product should be 1.
I don't get it, I thought that for two lines to be parallel they had to have the same slope.
So in this case m = p

Thanks
Cheers
J

For 2 lines to be parallel, their slopes must be equal and for 2 lines to be perpendicular, the product of slopes should = -1
Here the question asked whether the slope of the reflection of line y=px+q which isx=py+q parallel to line y= mx+n

So the slope of reflected line x=py+q ---------> 1/p

ie. is 1/p= m or in this case is pm= 1
_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”
Intern
Joined: 14 Jun 2013
Posts: 27
A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2014, 19:52
jlgdr wrote:
nktdotgupta wrote:
A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?

(1) m = p + 2

(2) m = 3p

When a line is reflected around y=x then the equation of the reflected line is got by swapping the x and y of the original equation.
So, equation of the reflection of the line y=px + q will be x = py + q

So, for this line to be parallel to y = mx + n we just need to make sure that the slope of the two lines are equal
i.e. 1/p = m

STAT1
m = p + 2
But we cannot say whether m=1/p will be true or not. Proof is below.
Trying m =1/p
we get
1/p = p + 2
p^2 + 2p - 1 =0
p = { -2 +- sqrt(4 + 4) }/2 = { -2 + 4sqrt2 } /2
But there can be many other values of p for which m = p+2 will be true but m = 1/p will not be true.
So, INSUFFICIENT

STAT2
m = 3p
But we cannot say whether m=1/p will be true or not. Proof is below.
Trying m = 1/p
1/p = 3p
=> p^2 = 1/3
But there can be many other values of p for which m = p+2 will be true but m = 1/p will not be true.
So, INSUFFICIENT

Taking both together we have
m = p+2 and m=3p
=> 3p = p+2
=> p = 1

So, m = p+2 = 3
And 1/p = 1
Clearly m is not equal to 1/p. So, lines are not parallel.

Hope it helps!

You say that for two lines to be parallel their product should be 1.
I don't get it, I thought that for two lines to be parallel they had to have the same slope.
So in this case m = p

Thanks
Cheers
J

Hi

Probably you are comparing with line equation y = mx+c, where slope is m, but this equation of the line is x= py+q,
So if you change the equation to y = mx+c form, in the slope intercept form I mean, then we will get
(x-q)/p = y
y = x/p - q/p
y = x(1/p) - q/p

hence the slope will be 1/p

Slope will change because we need to change the equation to make it in the form of slope intercept, if we want to express slope in terms of y =mx+c.. got it?
let me know if there is still any confusion..
Cheers
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8456
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Re: A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2015, 22:41
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?

(1) m = p + 2

(2) m = 3p

Modify the original condition and the question. If y=px+q is reflected over the line y=x, x=py+q, py=x-q, y=(x/p)-(q/p), which is the question if it is parallel to the line y=mx+n. Therefore, 1/p=m? -> mp=1?.
There are 4 variables(m,p,n,q), which should match with the number of equations. So, you need 4 equations. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make E the answer. In 1) & 2), p=1, m=3 -> mp=3=/1, which is no and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is C.

-> For cases where we need 3 more equations, such as original conditions with “3 variables”, or “4 variables and 1 equation”, or “5 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 80% chance that E is the answer (especially about 90% of 2 by 2 questions where there are more than 3 variables), while C has 15% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since E is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or D.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
"Only \$79 for 1 month Online Course"
"Free Resources-30 day online access & Diagnostic Test"
"Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself"
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 14016
Re: A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2019, 06:22
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the   [#permalink] 27 Nov 2019, 06:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by