Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Oct 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT On Demand for $79. For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+) AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions) Oct 23 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join an exclusive interview with the people behind the test. If you're taking the GMAT, this is a webinar you cannot afford to miss! Oct 26 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Want to score 90 percentile or higher on GMAT CR? Attend this free webinar to learn how to prethink assumptions and solve the most challenging questions in less than 2 minutes.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 14
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
WE: Design (Other)

A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 11 Jan 2014, 04:46
Question Stats:
47% (02:06) correct 53% (02:12) wrong based on 793 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers consecutive? (1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the lowest number removed is 1 more than the average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the highest number removed. (2) The positive difference between any two numbers in the list is always less than n
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by UdaySJha on 11 Jan 2014, 01:18.
Last edited by Bunuel on 11 Jan 2014, 04:46, edited 1 time in total.
RENAMED THE TOPIC.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58446

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jan 2014, 06:01
A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers consecutive?Notice that we are told that the list contains distinct integers. Say the numbers in the list in ascending order are: \(x_1\), \(x_2\), ..., \(x_n\). (1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the lowest number removed is 1 more than the average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the highest number removed. \(\frac{x_2+x_3+...+x_n}{n1}=\frac{x_1+x_2+...+x_{n1}}{n1}+1\); \(x_n=x_1+n1\). The above implies that: \(x_2=x_1+1\); \(x_3=x_1+2\); ... Therefore the integers in the list are consecutive. Sufficient. (2) The positive difference between any two numbers in the list is always less than n. This holds true for any list of consecutive integers: even the difference between the largest and smallest elements must be less than the number of elements (n). For example, {1, 2, 3} > 31=2<3. Since we are told that the list contains distinct integers, then no other set than the set of consecutive integers can satisfy that. Sufficient. Answer: D. Hope it's c;ear.
_________________




Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 116

Re: consecutive integers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jan 2014, 04:38
UdaySJha wrote: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers consecutive? (1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the lowest number removed is 1 more than the average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the highest number removed. (2) The positive difference between any two numbers in the list is always less than n (1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the lowest number removed is 1 more than the average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the highest number removed. (2) The positive difference between any two numbers in the list is always less than n[/quote] Statement I is sufficient Let us say n = 4 and the numbers are 4, 5, 6 and 7 If we remove 4 then the average is 6 If we remove 7 then the average is 5 which satisfies with the statement Now lets go algebra: If the numbers are {x, x+1, x+2.....x+n1} with average (2x + n  1)/2 (First + last)/2 If we remove x then the average will become (x + 1 + x + n  1)/2 = (2x + n)/2 increasing by 1/2 If we remove x + n  1 the average will become (x + x + n 2)/2 = (2x + n 2)/2 decreasing by 1/2 Hence the difference will always be the 1 between them. Statement II is sufficient: If the numbers are {x, x+1, x+2.....x+n1} If we subtract the first and the last we will get = x + n  1  x = n  1 which is always less than n. Now is there any other set which can have that. Since the members of the set are distinct it is not possible to have that. Answer is D.
_________________
76000 Subscribers, 7 million minutes of learning delivered and 5.6 million video views
Perfect Scores http://perfectscores.org http://www.youtube.com/perfectscores




Intern
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 14
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
WE: Design (Other)

Re: consecutive integers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jan 2014, 05:19
[ color=#ffff00]PerfectScores wrote: UdaySJha wrote: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers consecutive? (1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the lowest number removed is 1 more than the average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the highest number removed. (2) The positive difference between any two numbers in the list is always less than n (1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the lowest number removed is 1 more than the average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the highest number removed. (2) The positive difference between any two numbers in the list is always less than n
Statement I is sufficient
Let us say n = 4 and the numbers are 4, 5, 6 and 7
If we remove 4 then the average is 6 If we remove 7 then the average is 5 which satisfies with the statement
Now lets go algebra:
If the numbers are {x, x+1, x+2.....x+n1} with average (2x + n  1)/2 (First + last)/2
If we remove x then the average will become (x + 1 + x + n  1)/2 = (2x + n)/2 increasing by 1/2 If we remove x + n  1 the average will become (x + x + n 2)/2 = (2x + n 2)/2 decreasing by 1/2
Hence the difference will always be the 1 between them.
Statement II is sufficient:
If the numbers are {x, x+1, x+2.....x+n1}
If we subtract the first and the last we will get = x + n  1  x = n  1 which is always less than n. Now is there any other set which can have that. Since the members of the set are distinct it is not possible to have that.
Answer is D.[/quote][/color] Hi Perfect score! Nice solution. I have little confusion in understanding the language used in the question stem . Here it is mentioned as list of number so whether we are suppose to assume numbers in the list always follow sequence or constant increment or decrease? Pls advise.



Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 116

Re: consecutive integers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jan 2014, 05:23
UdaySJha wrote: [ color=#ffff00]PerfectScores wrote: UdaySJha wrote: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers consecutive? (1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the lowest number removed is 1 more than the average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the highest number removed. (2) The positive difference between any two numbers in the list is always less than n (1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the lowest number removed is 1 more than the average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the highest number removed. (2) The positive difference between any two numbers in the list is always less than n
Statement I is sufficient
Let us say n = 4 and the numbers are 4, 5, 6 and 7
If we remove 4 then the average is 6 If we remove 7 then the average is 5 which satisfies with the statement
Now lets go algebra:
If the numbers are {x, x+1, x+2.....x+n1} with average (2x + n  1)/2 (First + last)/2
If we remove x then the average will become (x + 1 + x + n  1)/2 = (2x + n)/2 increasing by 1/2 If we remove x + n  1 the average will become (x + x + n 2)/2 = (2x + n 2)/2 decreasing by 1/2
Hence the difference will always be the 1 between them.
Statement II is sufficient:
If the numbers are {x, x+1, x+2.....x+n1}
If we subtract the first and the last we will get = x + n  1  x = n  1 which is always less than n. Now is there any other set which can have that. Since the members of the set are distinct it is not possible to have that.
Answer is D.[/color] Hi Perfect score! Nice solution. I have little confusion in understanding the language used in the question stem . Here it is mentioned as list of number so whether we are suppose to assume numbers in the list always follow sequence or constant increment or decrease? Pls advise.[/quote] You have to look at both the scenarios. Since the numbers are distinct in the set it is not possible to have any other set apart from numbers which are consecutive.
_________________
76000 Subscribers, 7 million minutes of learning delivered and 5.6 million video views
Perfect Scores http://perfectscores.org http://www.youtube.com/perfectscores



Intern
Joined: 04 Aug 2013
Posts: 28
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.23
WE: Consulting (Real Estate)

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jan 2014, 11:33
What if the set includes {1,2,4,5,6}? Then n = 5 and the difference between 2 and 4 is less than 5 but the set is not consecutive.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58446

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jan 2014, 11:40
HCalum11 wrote: What if the set includes {1,2,4,5,6}? Then n = 5 and the difference between 2 and 4 is less than 5 but the set is not consecutive. Notice that the second statement says "the positive difference between ANY two numbers in the list is always less than n". In your example the difference between 6 and 1 is 5, not less than 5, therefore your set is not valid. Does this make sense?
_________________



Intern
Joined: 04 Aug 2013
Posts: 28
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.23
WE: Consulting (Real Estate)

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jan 2014, 11:54
Bunuel wrote: HCalum11 wrote: What if the set includes {1,2,4,5,6}? Then n = 5 and the difference between 2 and 4 is less than 5 but the set is not consecutive. Notice that the second statement says "the positive difference between ANY two numbers in the list is always less than n". In your example the difference between 6 and 1 is 5, not less than 5, therefore your set is not valid. Does this make sense? Thanks Bunuel! Makes perfect sense.



Intern
Joined: 08 Nov 2013
Posts: 37

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Jun 2014, 04:33
Why are we assuming that the set will always contain positive integers?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58446

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Jun 2014, 05:15
kamranjkhan wrote: Why are we assuming that the set will always contain positive integers? We did not assume that. Check here: alistcontainsndistinctintegersareallnintegerscons165873.html#p1316160
_________________



Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Posts: 2

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Aug 2014, 04:52
What if my set is 1,0,1,2. Then the diff 2(1) >2 What do we mean by positive difference? (Is it ab or ab?)



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58446

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Aug 2014, 13:16
gtupak wrote: What if my set is 1,0,1,2. Then the diff 2(1) >2 What do we mean by positive difference? (Is it ab or ab?) The positive difference between a and b means a  b. In your example, if set is {1, 0, 1, 2}, then n = 4 (the number of elements in the set) and the positive difference between any two numbers in the list is less than 4.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 73
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.25
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Sep 2015, 08:19
Is there a propery like " if the list consists of concecutive integers, then with any one number removed from the set, the mean of the set will vary maximum (+ 0.5) .



Intern
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 3

A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Sep 2015, 06:04
Hi there, still i have concerns for me statement 1 is only sufficient for B let's assume 2 different scenarios 1 N contains {1,2,3,4,5} which means n=5 and if we deduct 51 = 4 so far so good 2 N contains {2,4,6,8} which means N =4 and if we deduct 82 = 6 so B should be insufficient



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7984

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Sep 2015, 07:04
Hesham_87 wrote: Hi there, still i have concerns for me statement 1 is only sufficient for B let's assume 2 different scenarios 1 N contains {1,2,3,4,5} which means n=5 and if we deduct 51 = 4 so far so good 2 N contains {2,4,6,8} which means N =4 and if we deduct 82 = 6 so B should be insufficient Hi, the statement says ... (2) The positive difference between any two numbers in the list is always less than n.. in the highlighted portion the positive difference is 6 which is more than 4(n here)... so the example taken here is not correct.. the least possible diff is when the number is consecutive and it is always one less than n, so no other scenario is possible where the diff is less than n in n distinct integers
_________________



Intern
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 3

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Sep 2015, 07:39
chetan2u Thank you



Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2509
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Feb 2016, 19:21
VeritasPrepKarishma somewhere wrote that in a set of consecutive n integers, if we remove one integer, the average of the new set can decrease/increase MAX by 0.5. 1. if we remove the lowest, our new average would be +0.5. if we remove the highest number  the new average would be 0.5. the statement tells that the difference is 1. this works in consecutive N integers only. 2. since we have distinctive integers and since the difference between any must be less than n, there is no way to create a list of N integers so that integers would not be consecutive. D



Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8017
GPA: 3.82

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Feb 2016, 23:13
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers consecutive? (1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the lowest number removed is 1 more than the average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the highest number removed. (2) The positive difference between any two numbers in the list is always less than n In the original condition, the number of variables is n, which should match with the number of equations. So you need n equations. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make E the answer. When 1) & 2), For 1), if m,m+1,m+2,,,,,,,,m+n2, m+n1, the number of these consecutive integers is n, which starts with m. The average excluding m(the smallest integer) is ={(m+1)+.......+(m+n2)+(m+n1)}/(n1)={m+(m+1)+.......+(m+n2)+(n1)}/(n1)={m+(m+1)+.......+(m+n2)}/(n1)+{(n1)/(n1)} ={m+(m+1)+.......+(m+n2)}/(n1)+1=m+n1(the biggest integer) average+1 excluding the biggest integer, which is yes and suffcient. For 2), it goes same for 1). That is, 1)=2). Therefore, the answer is D. For cases where we need 3 more equations, such as original conditions with “3 variables”, or “4 variables and 1 equation”, or “5 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 80% chance that E is the answer (especially about 90% of 2 by 2 questions where there are more than 3 variables), while C has 15% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since E is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or D.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spareThe oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. "Only $79 for 1 month Online Course""Free Resources30 day online access & Diagnostic Test""Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself"



Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1348
Location: Malaysia

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Feb 2017, 18:33
UdaySJha wrote: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers consecutive? (1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the lowest number removed is 1 more than the average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the highest number removed. (2) The positive difference between any two numbers in the list is always less than n Solution from "Thursdays With Ron"
Attachments
A list contains n different integers II.jpg [ 188.49 KiB  Viewed 6174 times ]
A list contains n different integers I.jpg [ 142.54 KiB  Viewed 6173 times ]
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."Rules for posting in verbal forum  Please DO NOT post short answer in your post! Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advancedsearch/



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 15281
Location: United States (CA)

Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Dec 2017, 15:48
Hi All, This DS question has a complex 'feel' to it, so you might find it useful to deal with the information in a slightly different "order" We're told that we have N DISTINCT integers (meaning that the numbers are all different  NO duplicates). We're asked if the N integers are consecutive. This is a YES/NO question. To start, if we ARE dealing with consecutive integers, then there will be a variety of builtin patterns that will define the integers as consecutive (and if we can spot any of those patterns, then we might be able to reverseengineer that the group is comprised of consecutive integers). Fact 2 is the easier of the two options, so I'm going to start there... 2) The positive difference between ANY two numbers in the list is always LESS than N. IF.... N = 2, then the difference between those two integers has to be LESS than 2. Since we already know that the numbers are DISTINCT, the two values would have to have a difference of 1. For example, the list could be {0,1}, {3,4}, {9, 8}, etc. This means that they ARE consecutive integers and the answer to the question is YES. IF... N = 3, then the difference between any two of those three integers has to be LESS than 3. Since we already know that the numbers are DISTINCT, then any two values would have to have a difference of 1 or 2. The group is 3 integers though, so again  they will have to be consecutive. For example {1, 2, 3}, {7, 8, 9}, {2, 1, 0}, etc. The answer to the question is also YES. Increasing the number of integers will NOT change the outcome (try an example with 4 or 5 integers and you'll see). The answer to the question will ALWAYS be YES. Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT. 1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the lowest number removed is 1 more than the average (arithmetic mean) of the list with the highest number removed. Since Fact 2 found a 'quirky' way to define that the list of integers was consecutive, it gets me thinking that maybe Fact 1 has also done that. However, we need proof before we make our assessment, so let's start off with a consecutive list of integers and see if it 'fits' what Fact 1 describes. IF... we're dealing with {1, 2, 3}, then N = 3. Remove the lowest value and the average becomes (2+3)/2 = 2.5 Remove the largest value and the average becomes (1+2)/2 = 1.5 The difference in averages IS exactly 1, so this example 'fits' what we're told and the answer to the question is YES. (incidentally, if you try any other group of consecutive integers, you'll find that this pattern holds true  you should try a few and prove it for yourself). Now let's try a group of numbers that is NOT consecutive.... IF... we're dealing with {1, 2, 4}, then N = 3. Remove the lowest value and the average becomes (2+4)/2 = 3 Remove the largest value and the average becomes (1+2)/2 = 1.5 The difference here is NOT 1 though, so this does NOT 'fit' what we were told and is NOT a valid example. Looking at this example, it seems that if the largest number is "too far" from the smallest number, and there are 'missing' integers in between, then the difference in averages will NOT equal 1 (it will be LARGER every time). With a few additional examples, you can prove it. Thus, the only groups of numbers that will fit Fact 1 are consecutive integers and the answer to the question will always be YES. Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT. Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.comThe Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+ souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★ ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★




Re: A list contains n distinct integers. Are all n integers cons
[#permalink]
17 Dec 2017, 15:48



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 26 posts ]



