It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 14:55

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A recent study has found that within the past few years,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 62 [7], given: 0

A recent study has found that within the past few years, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2004, 10:56
7
KUDOS
57
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

55% (00:49) correct 45% (00:58) wrong based on 3183 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A recent study has found that within the past few years, many doctors had elected early retirement rather than face the threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance.

(A) had elected early retirement rather than face
(C) have elected retiring early instead of facing
(D) have elected to retire early rather than facing
(E) have elected to retire early rather than face

[Reveal] Spoiler: OE
OG Verbal Review 2, SC#39

Verb form; Parallelism

For action that started in the past and continues into the present, it is correct to use the present perfect tense: have elected. When a choice is presented using the rather than construction-the doctors ha'ue chosen x rather than y-the x and the y must be parallel. In this case, the doctors have chosen to retire rather than (to understood) face. To does not need to be repeated in order to maintain parallelism because it is understood.

(A) Had elected shows an action completed in the past; early retirement is not parallel to face.
(B) Had elected shows an action completed in the past; retirement and facing are not parallel.
(C) Have elected must be followed by an infinitive (to retire).
(D) Facing and to retire early are not parallel.
(E) Correct. In this sentence, have elected shows action continuing into the present; to retire and (to understood) face are parallel.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 62 [7], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2004, 13:25
OA is "E".
I had a tie between A and E. I chose A because the incident reported, had happened in the past. The doctors chose to retire. They are not choosing to retire. The survey shows that the doctors "chose" they are not choosing....

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 150

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas, TX

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2004, 13:43
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Here's an attempt at an explanation...

In the sentence given, there isn't really a sequence of events, it's a stating a recent study.

Here's an example of where had will make sense,

The doctors had retired before the lawyers sued them for malpractice.

In this sentence, had is used to indicate that an event occured before another event. First the doctors retired, then the lawyers sued them. "Had" in this sentence establishes that sequence.

Hope this helps...

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [3], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2004, 14:19
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
E is better because it is using present perfect tense. The passage is in the present tense so talking about an event that happened prior to another event in the present(and could be still ongoing), we use present perfect.

present perfect: ie I am playing scrabble but note that I have achieved my goal --> I achieved the goal and then, presently, I am playing scrabble
past perfect: ie I played scrabble but I had achieved my goal --> I played scrabble(in the past) but at some point before that, I achieved my goal.

http://webster.commnet.edu/grammar/tens ... tm#perfect
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [3], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [1], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2005, 11:11
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
You cannot elect early retirement, but you can elect to retire early.
Only (D) and (E) are possible choices.

(E) is the best for parallellism because "elected to retire" is parallel to "face"

Kudos [?]: 112 [1], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2231

Kudos [?]: 377 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2005, 11:13
1
KUDOS
Don't you have to say "to face" instead of "face"?

Kudos [?]: 377 [1], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [4], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2005, 11:28
4
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Here I am talking about usage of verbs to maintain the parallelism.

"have elected to retire" is a verb or an action
"face" is also an action or a verb.

If you use "to" before "face" then it looks like the doctors have elected to face something. It looked awkward.

In all the other sentences verb and gerunds/participles are used. Those sentences are least parallel.

Parallellism means you should use similar class of sentence fragment/elements.

Noun/Noun Phrase + Noun/Gerund/Noun Phrase/Gerund Phrase
Verb + Verb

I hope I have clarified my point.

Kudos [?]: 112 [4], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2005
Posts: 100

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: San Jose,USA- India

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2005, 12:41
Anybody has any info on "rather than" vs "instead of".I looked at the grammer sites,could not find any info.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2231

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2005, 12:42

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2005
Posts: 100

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: San Jose,USA- India

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2005, 15:24
As Anand mentioned pl'ism should be between "have elected" and "facing", not between "retiring" and "facing".Hence C is wrong.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 418

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Location: Phoenix

### Show Tags

13 May 2005, 16:54
I'd go with C.

Since "have" is to be used instead of "had" A and B can be rejected.
D violates parallelism. (have and facing).
E voilates parallelism because "retire" and "face" would not go well with
"rising"
C is fine because "retiring" and "facing" go alongwith "rising".

Any other ideas?
_________________

Who says elephants can't dance?

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 543

Kudos [?]: 37 [1], given: 0

Location: Canuckland

### Show Tags

13 May 2005, 23:28
1
KUDOS
C sounds a bit better than E. I think it is because of 'within'. If it was 'recently' I think, I'd go with E. Parallel structures aren't a problem in E or C imo.

Kudos [?]: 37 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 93

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 May 2005, 10:34
Really?

The phrase "elected to" sounds alot better than just "elected early"

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Posts: 486

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Location: Milan Italy

### Show Tags

14 May 2005, 10:50
Let's get rid of A and B and put in the sentence HAVE as the right verb.

many doctors have elected -> this is subject + correct verb
early retirement rather than face -> these are 2 objects of the verb TO ELECT
[FACE] the threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance -> these are 2 objects of the verb TO FACE.

The rising cost has therefore a different grammatical function, and SHOULD NOT be parallel to RETIREMENT AND FACE.

As far as idiom is concerned, I think elect to + verb is correct. D and E remain. D is not parallel.
E is parallel in my opinion since [TO] before face is not needed.

Final sentence:
A recent study has found that within the past few years, many doctors have elected to retire early rather than face the threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 69

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2005, 07:02
I will go with E on this.

I know its between C and E.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 69

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2005, 07:20
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I have found this material when looking for instead of vs rather than:

The phrase rather than consists of an adverb and a conjunction and often means "and not," as in I decided to skip lunch rather than eat in the cafeteria again. It is grammatically similar to sooner than in that it is used with a "bare" infinitiveâ€”an infinitive minus to: I would stay here and eat flies sooner than go with them.

Rather than can also be used with nouns as a compound preposition meaning "instead of": I bought a mountain bike rather than a ten-speed. But some people object to this use, insisting that than should be used only as a conjunction. They therefore object to constructions in which rather than is followed by a gerund, as in Rather than buying a new car, I kept my old one.

In some cases, however, rather than can only be followed by a gerund and not by a bare infinitive. If the main verb of the sentence has a form that does not allow parallel treatment of the verb following rather than, you cannot use a bare infinitive, and you must use a gerund. This is often the case when the main verb is in a past tense or has a participle. Thus, you must say The results of the study, rather than ending (not end or ended) the controversy, only added to it. If the main verb was in the present tense (add), you could use the bare infinitive end.

Curiously, when the rather than construction follows the main verb, it can use other verb forms besides the bare infinitive. Thus you can say The results of the study added to the controversy rather than ended it.

The overriding concern in all of this should be to avoid faulty parallels, as in sentences like Rather than buy a new car, I have kept my old one and Rather than take a cab, she is going on foot.

Clearly, it is grammatically defensible to follow rather than with a gerund, but if you prefer to avoid the controversy, use instead of with gerunds.

Based on what the bolded paragraph says the answer I think is C.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 330

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2005, 04:08
I choose E.

Huskers,
Your explanation on use of rather than vs instead is very helpful. However, the infinitive form (to be) form of the verb is more appropriate than the limited present-tense â€œisâ€

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 361

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Location: London

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2005, 04:11
I would go for E.

to retire rather than face is correct.
rather than is usually followed by an infinitive without to

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5034

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2005, 08:47
OA is E. We need parallel structure to retire... (to) face..

The second infinitive does not need the 'to' to be stated explicitly.

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 137

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2005, 09:38
Thats Odd!

C is explicitly parallel, so wondering why its not C over E which is implicitly parallel!!!!!!!
_________________

Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

29 Sep 2005, 09:38

Go to page    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9    Next  [ 166 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by