Last visit was: 17 Jul 2025, 20:58 It is currently 17 Jul 2025, 20:58
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Parallelism|   Verb Tense/Form|   Verb Tense/Form|   Verb Tense/Form|                     
avatar
jiaxin
Joined: 21 Feb 2020
Last visit: 15 Dec 2020
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 200
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 17 July 2025
Posts: 4,847
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,847
Kudos: 8,646
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jkrishh7
Joined: 06 Feb 2020
Last visit: 16 Sep 2020
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Status:When going gets tough, tough gets going_GMAT2020
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
WE:Engineering (Military & Defense)
Posts: 37
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
TarunKumar1234
Joined: 14 Jul 2020
Last visit: 28 Feb 2024
Posts: 1,107
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 351
Location: India
Posts: 1,107
Kudos: 1,336
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A recent study has found that within the past few years, many doctors had elected early retirement rather than face the threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance.

(A) had elected early retirement rather than face-> has found, so it must be have elected.
(B) had elected early retirement instead of facing-> has found, so it must be have elected.
(C) have elected retiring early instead of facing-> instead of is not used for contrast.
(D) have elected to retire early rather than facing-> to retire is not parallel to facing.
(E) have elected to retire early rather than face-> above errors are corrected here.

So, I think E. :)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
Harsh2111s
Quote:
A recent study has found that within the past few years, many doctors had elected early retirement rather than face the threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance.

(A) had elected early retirement rather than face
(B) had elected early retirement instead of facing
(C) have elected retiring early instead of facing
(D) have elected to retire early rather than facing
(E) have elected to retire early rather than face

GMATNinja AjiteshArun VeritasKarishma

"and" is the parallelism trigger here.
Phrases before and after "and" seem parallel.
"facing the threats of lawsuits" is parallel to "rising costs of malpractice insurance".
Hence option D should be correct.
Where am I wrong here ?

'and' does combine two elements of a list but which two elements are they?
'the threats of lawsuits' and 'the rising costs of malpractice insurance'
threats and rising costs.

There is another pair of parallel elements - 'retire early' rather than 'face the threats ...'
They need to be parallel too so (D) is incorrect 'retire early' rather than 'facing the threats...'
(E) does this correctly.

VeritasKarishma
threats -->noun
rising-->adjective
so, it seems that they are not parallel each other-the actual parallelism is in the silent position like the following..
A recent study has found that within the past few years, many doctors have elected to retire early rather than (to) face the threats of lawsuits and (to face) the rising costs of malpractice insurance.

is it ok?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,111
Own Kudos:
74,378
 [1]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,111
Kudos: 74,378
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TheUltimateWinner
threats -->noun
rising-->adjective
so, it seems that they are not parallel each other-the actual parallelism is in the silent position like the following..
A recent study has found that within the past few years, many doctors have elected to retire early rather than (to) face the threats of lawsuits and (to face) the rising costs of malpractice insurance.

is it ok?

The parallel elements are 'threats' and 'rising costs'. Costs is the noun and 'rising' is a modifier to costs.

Look at another example:
There are two problems we are facing today - 'inflation' and 'increasing rates'
User avatar
TargetMBA007
Joined: 22 Nov 2019
Last visit: 21 Feb 2025
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 216
Schools: Stanford (S)
GPA: 4.0
Schools: Stanford (S)
Posts: 268
Kudos: 264
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle, AndrewN, AjiteshArun MartyTargetTestPrep CrackVerbalGMAT

Guys would appreciate some help with B. OG says, retirement and facing are not parallel but I am not able to figure out why, as they are both nouns. To answer my own question, I wonder if it's because "facing" here is acting as an adjective modifying "the threats" and not as a noun?
Thanks
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,380
 [3]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,380
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TargetMBA007
EducationAisle, AndrewN, AjiteshArun MartyTargetTestPrep CrackVerbalGMAT

Guys would appreciate some help with B. OG says, retirement and facing are not parallel but I am not able to figure out why, as they are both nouns. To answer my own question, I wonder if it's because "facing" here is acting as an adjective modifying "the threats" and not as a noun?
Thanks
Hello, TargetMBA007. Yeah, the OG is big on airtight parallelism as often as such elements can be tightly mirrored. In answer choice (B), retiring, not retirement, would be perfectly parallel to facing, similar to what we see in (C). But there are other problems with (B)—the past perfect had elected, and instead of when rather than is called for—as I would hope the OG also points out. The takeaway is not to get too caught up on any given flaw in an answer if three or more appear. SC questions often test multiple concepts in the underlined portion, both grammatical and semantic. So, in short, a noun-to-noun parallel construct might not be good enough to satisfy the parallelism demands of the exam. Better to play it safe. If no reasonable alternative exists, then you might have to go with something a little skewed on the surface.

I hope that helps. Thank you for calling my attention to the question.

- Andrew
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,876
Own Kudos:
3,574
 [2]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,876
Kudos: 3,574
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TargetMBA007
Guys would appreciate some help with B. OG says, retirement and facing are not parallel but I am not able to figure out why, as they are both nouns.
You are right. Technically speaking, facing is used as a gerund here (a noun form, since facing is the object of preposition of).

However, as Andrew mentioned, GMAT would just prefer an option that does close mirroring of the parallel elements.
User avatar
TargetMBA007
Joined: 22 Nov 2019
Last visit: 21 Feb 2025
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 216
Schools: Stanford (S)
GPA: 4.0
Schools: Stanford (S)
Posts: 268
Kudos: 264
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
TargetMBA007
EducationAisle, AndrewN, AjiteshArun MartyTargetTestPrep CrackVerbalGMAT

Guys would appreciate some help with B. OG says, retirement and facing are not parallel but I am not able to figure out why, as they are both nouns. To answer my own question, I wonder if it's because "facing" here is acting as an adjective modifying "the threats" and not as a noun?
Thanks
Hello, TargetMBA007. So, in short, a noun-to-noun parallel construct might not be good enough to satisfy the parallelism demands of the exam. Better to play it safe. If no reasonable alternative exists, then you might have to go with something a little skewed on the surface.

I hope that helps. Thank you for calling my attention to the question.

- Andrew

AndrewN Thanks for responding Andrew. Definitely noticed the error with the past perfect too, but I was just curious about the Parallelism issue with this one. You mentioned "Noun to Noun" construct here, but I wondered if it's really a noun to noun construct, or if its wrong because technically its a "noun to adjective" construct, with facing being used as an adjective?
User avatar
TargetMBA007
Joined: 22 Nov 2019
Last visit: 21 Feb 2025
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 216
Schools: Stanford (S)
GPA: 4.0
Schools: Stanford (S)
Posts: 268
Kudos: 264
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
TargetMBA007
Guys would appreciate some help with B. OG says, retirement and facing are not parallel but I am not able to figure out why, as they are both nouns.
You are right. Technically speaking, facing is used as a gerund here (a noun form, since facing is the object of preposition of).

However, as Andrew mentioned, GMAT would just prefer an option that does close mirroring of the parallel elements.

EducationAisle Thanks Ashish, does this mean that in all cases a gerund cannot be parallel to a simple noun? Also, still a bit confused about whether "facing" here is a noun/gerund or an adjective? The dictionary definitions of facing as a Noun and Adjective seem to imply that in this case it might not be a noun, but I could be wrong here?

Quote:
Facing - noun
1.
a layer of material covering part of a garment and providing contrast, decoration, or strength.
2.
an outer layer covering the surface of a wall.
"the bricks were used as a facing on a concrete core"

Facing - adjective
positioned with the front toward a certain direction; opposite.
"two large front-facing windows"
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,380
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,380
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TargetMBA007
AndrewN Thanks for responding Andrew. Definitely noticed the error with the past perfect too, but I was just curious about the Parallelism issue with this one. You mentioned "Noun to Noun" construct here, but I wondered if it's really a noun to noun construct, or if its wrong because technically its a "noun to adjective" construct, with facing being used as an adjective?
To be clear, yes, facing is used in a nominative (noun) capacity here as a gerund. There is no such thing as an instead of + [adjective] construct. Instead of requires a noun to follow, while rather than is a bit more versatile, allowing for either nouns or verbs to follow.

CORRECT: I walked rather than ran.
INCORRECT: I walked instead of ran.

In option (B) of the sentence we are discussing, the shell of the sentence tells us what we need to compare:

Doctors elected A instead of B.

For more insight into the topic, I would recommend checking out this thread in the Manhattan Prep forum.

Happy reading.

- Andrew
User avatar
TargetMBA007
Joined: 22 Nov 2019
Last visit: 21 Feb 2025
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 216
Schools: Stanford (S)
GPA: 4.0
Schools: Stanford (S)
Posts: 268
Kudos: 264
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
TargetMBA007
AndrewN Thanks for responding Andrew. Definitely noticed the error with the past perfect too, but I was just curious about the Parallelism issue with this one. You mentioned "Noun to Noun" construct here, but I wondered if it's really a noun to noun construct, or if its wrong because technically its a "noun to adjective" construct, with facing being used as an adjective?
To be clear, yes, facing is used in a nominative (noun) capacity here as a gerund. There is no such thing as an instead of + [adjective] construct. Instead of requires a noun to follow, while rather than is a bit more versatile, allowing for either nouns or verbs to follow.

CORRECT: I walked rather than ran.
INCORRECT: I walked instead of ran.

In option (B) of the sentence we are discussing, the shell of the sentence tells us what we need to compare:

Doctors elected A instead of B.

For more insight into the topic, I would recommend checking out this thread in the Manhattan Prep forum.

Happy reading.

- Andrew

Thanks AndrewN. The difference between "instead of" and "rather than" makes complete sense, Thanks. I am still struggling to nail the parallelism issue with this. I see we have a gerund and an action noun here, is that the reason why they are not parallel?

Just been digging more into it, I found that:
* A simple gerund CANNOT be parallel to an Action Noun (Which is the case in our example I believe?) BUT a "complex gerund" can be parallel to an action noun?

I came up with this simple table to make sense of the different possible combinations between simplex and complex gerunds, action nouns and concrete nouns. Wonder if this looks right to you?

Attachment:
Gerunds Nouns.jpg
Gerunds Nouns.jpg [ 34.99 KiB | Viewed 2606 times ]

Please tell me I have nailed it :).

Thanks
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,380
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TargetMBA007
Thanks AndrewN. The difference between "instead of" and "rather than" makes complete sense, Thanks. I am still struggling to nail the parallelism issue with this. I see we have a gerund and an action noun here, is that the reason why they are not parallel?

Just been digging more into it, I found that:
* A simple gerund CANNOT be parallel to an Action Noun (Which is the case in our example I believe?) BUT a "complex gerund" can be parallel to an action noun?

I came up with this simple table to make sense of the different possible combinations between simplex and complex gerunds, action nouns and concrete nouns. Wonder if this looks right to you?

Attachment:
Gerunds Nouns.jpg

Please tell me I have nailed it :).

Thanks
Hello again, TargetMBA007. I can see the allure of building fences around fences, as one of my colleagues said to me in graduate school, but these rules are not likely to help you when it comes to GMAT™ SC. I can think of zero cases, for instance, in which I have used a comparison between a complex gerund and something else as grounds for elimination. This is not to say that everyone learns the same way or should pursue a similar line of thought, but I stress a simple, holistic approach to SC, not one based in computer fashion on input-output relationships between specific variables. I have shared what I believe the OG meant regarding a lack of parallelism in (B). I would stick to the surface of the issue and move on, looking to pick up other lessons that are more broadly applicable to the task at hand. In short, I think you are following a linguistics path, not one that will aid you in answering SC questions correctly. (And I love linguistics.)

- Andrew
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 362
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
TargetMBA007
EducationAisle, AndrewN, AjiteshArun MartyTargetTestPrep CrackVerbalGMAT

Guys would appreciate some help with B. OG says, retirement and facing are not parallel but I am not able to figure out why, as they are both nouns. To answer my own question, I wonder if it's because "facing" here is acting as an adjective modifying "the threats" and not as a noun?
Thanks
Hello, TargetMBA007. Yeah, the OG is big on airtight parallelism as often as such elements can be tightly mirrored. In answer choice (B), retiring, not retirement, would be perfectly parallel to facing, similar to what we see in (C). But there are other problems with (B)—the past perfect had elected, and instead of when rather than is called for—as I would hope the OG also points out. The takeaway is not to get too caught up on any given flaw in an answer if three or more appear. SC questions often test multiple concepts in the underlined portion, both grammatical and semantic. So, in short, a noun-to-noun parallel construct might not be good enough to satisfy the parallelism demands of the exam. Better to play it safe. If no reasonable alternative exists, then you might have to go with something a little skewed on the surface.

I hope that helps. Thank you for calling my attention to the question.

- Andrew

Got it correct but still thinking a good reason to eliminate (C)? Parallelism seems fine.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,380
 [3]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,380
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakshya14
Got it correct but still thinking a good reason to eliminate (C)? Parallelism seems fine.
Hello, lakshya14. Congratulations on getting the correct answer. Choice (C) is indeed parallel; however, the -ing form does not fit with the idiom to elect [to do something]. That is, elect is used in place of opt (similar to option) or choose here, and have opted/chosen retiring is simply incorrect. The infinitive form of the verb is needed instead: have elected (opted/chosen) to retire. The answer choice presents an example of why you cannot blindly follow parallelism. These questions are written carefully to contain such traps.

I hope that helps. I think I am ready for a break on this one!

- Andrew
User avatar
TargetMBA007
Joined: 22 Nov 2019
Last visit: 21 Feb 2025
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 216
Schools: Stanford (S)
GPA: 4.0
Schools: Stanford (S)
Posts: 268
Kudos: 264
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
TargetMBA007
Thanks AndrewN. The difference between "instead of" and "rather than" makes complete sense, Thanks. I am still struggling to nail the parallelism issue with this. I see we have a gerund and an action noun here, is that the reason why they are not parallel?

Just been digging more into it, I found that:
* A simple gerund CANNOT be parallel to an Action Noun (Which is the case in our example I believe?) BUT a "complex gerund" can be parallel to an action noun?

I came up with this simple table to make sense of the different possible combinations between simplex and complex gerunds, action nouns and concrete nouns. Wonder if this looks right to you?

Attachment:
Gerunds Nouns.jpg

Please tell me I have nailed it :).

Thanks
Hello again, TargetMBA007. I can see the allure of building fences around fences, as one of my colleagues said to me in graduate school, but these rules are not likely to help you when it comes to GMAT™ SC. I can think of zero cases, for instance, in which I have used a comparison between a complex gerund and something else as grounds for elimination. This is not to say that everyone learns the same way or should pursue a similar line of thought, but I stress a simple, holistic approach to SC, not one based in computer fashion on input-output relationships between specific variables. I have shared what I believe the OG meant regarding a lack of parallelism in (B). I would stick to the surface of the issue and move on, looking to pick up other lessons that are more broadly applicable to the task at hand. In short, I think you are following a linguistics path, not one that will aid you in answering SC questions correctly. (And I love linguistics.)

- Andrew

Thanks Andrew, that makes a lot of sense. I have to learn to tame the analyst in me :)
avatar
aashigarg
Joined: 01 Mar 2019
Last visit: 24 Jun 2025
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 207
Location: India
GPA: 3.7
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What about the parallelism between the face and the the rising costs? Why is this parallelism not considered?
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,876
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,876
Kudos: 3,574
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aashigarg
What about the parallelism between the face and the the rising costs? Why is this parallelism not considered?
This is the reason that understanding of intended meaning is so crucial before applying parallelism rules.

The intended meaning is that Doctors don't want to face the following two things:

(i) the threats of lawsuits
and
(ii) the rising costs of malpractice insurance

So, the above two things need to be parallel.

In other words, parallelism is not intended to be between "face" and "the rising costs"; parallelism is intended to be between "the threats of lawsuits" and "the rising costs of malpractice insurance". Both of these are indeed parallel - both are noun phrases.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,144
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,144
Kudos: 4,729
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aashigarg
What about the parallelism between the face and the the rising costs? Why is this parallelism not considered?

Hello aashigarg,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can help resolve your doubt.

Please remember, in a sentence parallelism is only to be maintained between elements that play similar roles in the sentence. Here, "retire early" and "face" play similar roles - they are the actions available to "doctors". By contrast, "the rising costs" is an object upon which the verb "face" acts, meaning the two are not supposed to be parallel.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts