Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 23:25 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 23:25
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
7,148
 [5]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 7,148
 [5]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,365
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,966
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,365
Kudos: 778,133
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone kindly help me to understand how option D does not effect the argument.
Option D states that A proposition for increasing funds for local drug treatment centers also failed to win approval. This means both Drug program and school program failed and there is another program that won the majority. So, on the importance of this program, the surveyed sample was distributed. So, does not option D resolve the discrepancy. Well, we don't know how the school program came very close to win or failed by a margin.
But, we got a hint that some other program, not mentioned in the premise won the proposition.
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
7,148
 [2]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 7,148
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sunny91
broall
A recent survey conducted in one North American city revealed widespread concern about the problems faced by teenagers today. Seventy percent of the adults surveyed said they would pay higher taxes for drug treatment programs, and 60 percent said they were willing to pay higher taxes to improve the city’s schools. Yet in a vote in that same city, a proposition to increase funding for schools by raising taxes failed by a narrow margin to win majority approval.

Which one of the following factors, if true, would LEAST contribute to an explanation of the discrepancy described above?

(A) The survey sample was not representative of the voters who voted on the proposition.
(B) Many of the people who were surveyed did not respond truthfully to all of the questions put to them.
(C) The proposition was only part of a more expensive community improvement program that voters had to accept or reject in total.
(D) A proposition for increasing funds for local drug treatment centers also failed to win approval.
(E) The proposition to raise taxes for schools was couched in terminology that many of the voters found confusing.

Source: LSAT

Hi Broall,
Can u kindly help me to understand how option d does not effect the argument.
Option D states that A proposition for increasing funds for local drug treatment centers also failed to win approval. This means both Drug program and school program failed and there is another program that won the majority. So, on the importance of this program, the surveyed sample was distributed. So, does not option D resolve the discrepancy. Well, we don't know how the school program came very close to winning or failed by a margin.
But, we got a hint that some other program, not mentioned in the premise won the proposition.

Hi,

Option D doesn't help to explain why there are contrast results occurred. Option D just provides extra information that the proposition to increase funds for local drug treatment also failed. Thus, it's clear that option D makes the paradox worse since we don't know not only why the proposition to increase funding for schools failed but also why the proposition to increase funding for drug treatment failed.
User avatar
GMATNinjaTwo
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Last visit: 02 Oct 2025
Posts: 234
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,071
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V48
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 234
Kudos: 1,095
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
sunny91
broall
A recent survey conducted in one North American city revealed widespread concern about the problems faced by teenagers today. Seventy percent of the adults surveyed said they would pay higher taxes for drug treatment programs, and 60 percent said they were willing to pay higher taxes to improve the city’s schools. Yet in a vote in that same city, a proposition to increase funding for schools by raising taxes failed by a narrow margin to win majority approval.

Which one of the following factors, if true, would LEAST contribute to an explanation of the discrepancy described above?

(A) The survey sample was not representative of the voters who voted on the proposition.
(B) Many of the people who were surveyed did not respond truthfully to all of the questions put to them.
(C) The proposition was only part of a more expensive community improvement program that voters had to accept or reject in total.
(D) A proposition for increasing funds for local drug treatment centers also failed to win approval.
(E) The proposition to raise taxes for schools was couched in terminology that many of the voters found confusing.

Source: LSAT

Hi Broall,
Can u kindly help me to understand how option d does not effect the argument.
Option D states that A proposition for increasing funds for local drug treatment centers also failed to win approval. This means both Drug program and school program failed and there is another program that won the majority. So, on the importance of this program, the surveyed sample was distributed. So, does not option D resolve the discrepancy. Well, we don't know how the school program came very close to winning or failed by a margin.
But, we got a hint that some other program, not mentioned in the premise won the proposition.

Hi,

Option D doesn't help to explain why there are contrast results occurred. Option D just provides extra information that the proposition to increase funds for local drug treatment also failed. Thus, it's clear that option D makes the paradox worse since we don't know not only why the proposition to increase funding for schools failed but also why the proposition to increase funding for drug treatment failed.
Thanks broall for the explanation!

To post additional questions not already addressed in this thread, feel free to use the request verbal experts' reply button.
avatar
Harsh raw
Joined: 31 Aug 2017
Last visit: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98
GMAT 1: 510 Q48 V15
Products:
GMAT 1: 510 Q48 V15
Posts: 5
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would love an official explanation
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,780
 [4]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,780
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Harsh raw
I would love an official explanation
Here we have an apparent discrepancy, so let's first make sure we've properly identified that discrepancy: 60 percent of adults surveyed in one NA city said they were willing to pay higher taxes to improve the city's schools. However, when that same city voted on a proposition to increase funding for schools by raising taxes, the proposition failed by a narrow margin to win majority approval.

So even though the majority of adults surveyed said that they would be willing to pay higher taxes to improve the city's schools, the majority of voters did not vote in favor of a proposition to increase school funding by raising taxes. We are looking for the answer choice that does NOT explain this apparent discrepancy. In other words, any answer choice that would readily explain the discrepancy can be crossed out.

See if that helps with your process of elimination! If you still have questions, feel free to use the request verbal experts' reply button. Please make your questions as detailed and specific as possible, and try to explain your thought process to help us better answer your questions.

Good luck!
User avatar
sony1000
Joined: 31 May 2015
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 206
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 220
Location: Fiji
Schools: IE
GPA: 1
Schools: IE
Posts: 206
Kudos: 298
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
why do many questions come out from LSAT , are they really applicable to gmat...
User avatar
GMATNinjaTwo
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Last visit: 02 Oct 2025
Posts: 234
Own Kudos:
1,095
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,071
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V48
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 234
Kudos: 1,095
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sony1000
why do many questions come out from LSAT , are they really applicable to gmat...
sony1000, check out this post and the linked threads. Hopefully that helps answer your question!
User avatar
anothermillenial
Joined: 21 Jul 2018
Last visit: 14 Aug 2020
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 80
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Posts: 151
Kudos: 455
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
A recent survey conducted in one North American city revealed widespread concern about the problems faced by teenagers today. Seventy percent of the adults surveyed said they would pay higher taxes for drug treatment programs, and 60 percent said they were willing to pay higher taxes to improve the city’s schools. Yet in a vote in that same city, a proposition to increase funding for schools by raising taxes failed by a narrow margin to win majority approval.

Which one of the following factors, if true, would LEAST contribute to an explanation of the discrepancy described above?

The premises we are given tell us:

    A recent survey conducted in one North American city revealed widespread concern about the problems faced by teenagers today. (So, survey says that people are concerned about teenager issues.)

    Seventy percent of the adults surveyed said they would pay higher taxes for drug treatment programs, and 60 percent said they were willing to pay higher taxes to improve the city’s schools. (We’re given some data points for two opinions about different programs for the city: 1) drug treatment and 2) city schools. No paradox yet!)

    Yet in a vote in that same city, a proposition to increase funding for schools by raising taxes failed by a narrow margin to win majority approval. (Ah, here’s the “yet”. So apparently, despite the high percentage of survey responses indicating support for the city school program, that proposition didn’t even get majority approval.)

Why’s that? Hm, it’s interesting they didn’t tell us anything about the drug treatment program. So I guess the city program was the only one that was “odd” in that the survey didn’t match the result. Maybe the right answer choice will pinpoint something about city program survey responders and the actual voters? Let’s see.


Oh, wait! We’re looking for the LEAST likely explanation for the discrepancy. Almost got fooled there!

Quote:
(A) The survey sample was not representative of the voters who voted on the proposition.
OK, well that could be true!

Quote:
(B) Many of the people who were surveyed did not respond truthfully to all of the questions put to them.
OK, same as (A). Also, the same as we expected!

Quote:
(C) The proposition was only part of a more expensive community improvement program that voters had to accept or reject in total.
Ah, this explains why the program might have failed. People probably supported city school program as a whole idea BUT NOT the specificities of it. :) Let's check other answers though!


Quote:
(D) A proposition for increasing funds for local drug treatment centers also failed to win approval.
This wouldn’t explain why the city programs didn’t win approval. This is a “opposing group” answer that would be wrong IF were were asked to explain the discrepancy. But since we’re looking for the LEAST HELPFUL explanation. This is good!

Quote:
(E) The proposition to raise taxes for schools was couched in terminology that many of the voters found confusing.
Hm, this could also explain it. If the proposition was super confusing then most people might not vote for something they can’t understand.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts