Last visit was: 13 Jul 2025, 06:23 It is currently 13 Jul 2025, 06:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Weaken|            
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
6,944
 [12]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 6,944
 [12]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
utkarshthapak
Joined: 09 Dec 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2018
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: IIMC  (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.5
WE:Engineering (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Products:
Schools: IIMC  (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 94
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Luckisnoexcuse
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Aug 2016
Last visit: 16 Apr 2022
Posts: 520
Own Kudos:
655
 [1]
Given Kudos: 198
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 740 Q51 V38
Products:
GMAT 2: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 520
Kudos: 655
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,519
Own Kudos:
5,697
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,519
Kudos: 5,697
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
utkarshthapak
can someone please explain why D is the correct option?

D is correct because it says if they had not taken the medication, they would have more serious problems.

It weakens the conclusion that those medications are just a waste of money. Since they took it, hence they got less severe problems.

I hope that makes sense. :)
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,052
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,052
Kudos: 9,686
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A survey was recently conducted among ferry passengers on the North Sea. Among the results was this: more of those who had taken anti-seasickness medication before their trip reported symptoms of seasickness than those who had not taken such medication. It is clear, then that despite claims by drug companies that clinical tests show the contrary, people would be better off not taking anti-seasickness medications.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?

Conclusion - despite claims by drug companies that clinical tests show the contrary, people would be better off not taking anti-seasickness medications.
Pre-thinking -- what if the group of people who took the medication would have been worse without it

(A) Given rough enough weather, most ferry passengers will have some symptoms of seasickness. -- Irrelevant
(B) The clinical tests reported by the drug companies were conducted by the drug companies’ staffs. -- Irrelevant
(C) People who do not take anti-seasickness medication are just as likely to respond to a survey on seasickness as people who do. -- Incorrect -- so the survey is proper
(D) The seasickness symptoms of the people who took anti-seasickness medication would have been more severe had they not taken the medication.- Correct
(E) People who have spent money on anti-seasickness medication are less likely to admit symptoms of seasickness than those who have not. -- Irrelevant -- it tells that number of people who have taken anti-seasickness medication and have symptoms are more that survey suggests

Answer D
If we change option C to People who do not take anti-seasickness medication are less likely to respond to a survey on seasickness as people who do -- Will this too be a valid weakener ?

AjiteshArun , mikemcgarry , VeritasPrepKarishma , sayantanc2k , GMATNinja , ChiranjeevSingh , other experts -- please enlighten .
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 01 Jun 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,056
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
If we change option C to People who do not take anti-seasickness medication are less likely to respond to a survey on seasickness as people who do -- Will this too be a valid weakener ?
Yes, this new option will give us a reason to doubt the survey itself. The smaller number could then be explained by the survey's underreporting.
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,238
Kudos: 1,317
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pikolo2510 nightblade354 generis VeritasPrepKarishma GMATNinja

Conclusion: despite claims by drug companies that clinical tests show the contrary, people would be better off not taking anti-seasickness medicines.

Premise: Survey results: more of people who had taken anti-seasickness medicines before their trip reported symptoms of seasickness than those who had not taken such medication.

Quote:
(A) Given rough enough weather, most ferry passengers will have some symptoms of seasickness.

In a typical weaken question,
1. I can bring outside information that is relevant to the argument.
2. I have to treat the answer options as premise and see if my belief on author's conclusion is weakened.

As per choice the mild language used by author gels so beautifully to point out that alternate cause ie rough weather
could attribute to sickness of most people who got sick during trip.

Can you help to understand why this choice does not weaken the argument?
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,780
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,290
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,780
Kudos: 6,577
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adkikani
pikolo2510 nightblade354 generis VeritasPrepKarishma GMATNinja

Conclusion: despite claims by drug companies that clinical tests show the contrary, people would be better off not taking anti-seasickness medicines.

Premise: Survey results: more of people who had taken anti-seasickness medicines before their trip reported symptoms of seasickness than those who had not taken such medication.

Quote:
(A) Given rough enough weather, most ferry passengers will have some symptoms of seasickness.

In a typical weaken question,
1. I can bring outside information that is relevant to the argument.
2. I have to treat the answer options as premise and see if my belief on author's conclusion is weakened.

As per choice the mild language used by author gels so beautifully to point out that alternate cause ie rough weather
could attribute to sickness of most people who got sick during trip.

Can you help to understand why this choice does not weaken the argument?

Why would this weaken the conclusion? You want to show that the medication made passengers better off in some way. This doesn't do that. It puts everyone in the same boat, literally. If no one is helped, how would this weaken the statement that you should not take the medicine?

Does this help?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,238
Kudos: 1,317
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks nightblade354 for your two cents.

Can you share your detailed approach while solving this?
Is this kind of 'double negative' question ?

To disprove: people would be better off not taking anti-seasickness medicines.
is same as:
To prove: people would get more sick if they had not taken medicines.

I took the argument as causal:
Cause: Taking medicines by people who suffer from seasickness before trip
Effect: No major improvement in health than those who did not took medicines.

How do you weaken a causal argument:
By showing alternate cause (bad weather) for the same effect?
Note that I have to link bad weather as an attribute to bad health of people since it is a premise in answer choice.
(Note if true in question stem.)
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,780
Own Kudos:
6,577
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3,290
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,780
Kudos: 6,577
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adkikani,

The conclusion states the medicine does not work. We want to prove it does work in some way, as we are asked to weaken the conclusion that it doesn't work. How do we do this? We look for some benefit. (A) strengthens the argument. It says nothing will work in rough weather. But where is rough weather in our premise? It isn't there, so you don't need to link it.

Does this help?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 21 Apr 2025
Posts: 5,965
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,965
Kudos: 5,156
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
A survey was recently conducted among ferry passengers on the North Sea. Among the results was this: more of those who had taken anti-seasickness medication before their trip reported symptoms of seasickness than those who had not taken such medication. It is clear, then that despite claims by drug companies that clinical tests show the contrary, people would be better off not taking anti-seasickness medications.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?

(A) Given rough enough weather, most ferry passengers will have some symptoms of seasickness.
(B) The clinical tests reported by the drug companies were conducted by the drug companies’ staffs.
(C) People who do not take anti-seasickness medication are just as likely to respond to a survey on seasickness as people who do.
(D) The seasickness symptoms of the people who took anti-seasickness medication would have been more severe had they not taken the medication.
(E) People who have spent money on anti-seasickness medication are less likely to admit symptoms of seasickness than those who have not.

(D) clearly challenges the highlighted part of the stimulus that anti-seasickness medication resulted in less severity as such it weakens the claim of the Clinical Tests.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
utkarshthapak
can someone please explain why D is the correct option?


Considering the enormity of the seasickness, people consuming the drug would be better off than the ones not consuming it.
User avatar
RohitSaluja
Joined: 02 Aug 2020
Last visit: 21 Sep 2024
Posts: 214
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 254
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Healthcare
Schools: HEC'22 (J)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.8
WE:Consulting (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Products:
Schools: HEC'22 (J)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 214
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
utkarshthapak
can someone please explain why D is the correct option?

Hi @utkarshpathak I might be late to respond, but to answer in simple terms arguments says people are better off not taking medicine as it does not have any impact, though D states that, had people not taken any medicine, their symptoms would have been worse, now this shows that the medicine works, hence it weakens the conclusion.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,438
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,438
Kudos: 953
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts